[外電] Smith應該在某些陣容搭配時減少三分出手

看板Pistons (底特律 活塞)作者 (雪餅)時間12年前 (2013/11/23 03:54), 編輯推噓13(1304)
留言17則, 9人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://tinyurl.com/ldj3le9 PistonPowered: Josh Smith needs to tone down the 3-point attempts in certain lineups By Dan Feldman Detroit Free Press Special Writer Before the season, I wrote that Josh Smith should shoot more three-pointers. 季前,我(Feldman)說Smith該多投些三分球。 (原文附有「該多投三分球」文章連結:http://tinyurl.com/l2zlc5l ) He listened, but I don't think he got the message. Smith聽進去了,不過他看來沒完全搞懂我(Feldman)的意思。 Smith is taking 5.5 three-pointers per game — more than twice his next-highest season average. Though he's making a paltry 30% of them, I don't really have a problem with his 5.5 attempts in and of themselves. The number seems high, but it's possible Smith could get that many good looks from long range in a given game. Smith場均出手5.5次三分球,是他之前單季最多三分出手次數的兩倍以上。 即使他只有30%的命中率,我並不是真的對他5.5次的出手次數有意見。雖然 5.5看起來是個蠻高的數字,不過Smith要獲得這麼多三分空檔是可能的。 The issue isn't the number of attempts, per se. It's when he takes them. 問題不是出在出手數本身,而是出手時機。 My logic previously was two-fold: 我(Feldman)原先(要Smith多投三分)的理由是這樣的: 1. It would be difficult for the Pistons to space the floor with Smith, Greg Monroe and Andre Drummond in the lineup. One way to create space would be for one of those bigs to drift to the perimeter, and Smith was best suited for that role. 1. Smith、Monroe和Drummond三塔同時上場的時候會需要拉開,而其中一個方法就是 有人要拉開到外圍,而Smith最適合擔任這個角色。 2. If shooting from perimeter, Smith was much better off taking three-pointers rather than long 2s. He makes both types of shots at similar clips, but considering threes are worth 50% more points per make, they're much preferred. 2. 如果要投外線,比起長中距離,Smith投三分更好。他兩種出手數差不多, 但考量到投進三分可以多得到50%的分數,投三分球比較恰當。 To his credit, Smith has aced that second point. After just 41% of his perimeter shots were three-pointers last season, 72% are this season. That's a fantastic improvement. 就Smith的狀況而言,上述第二點並不適用。他上季僅有41%外線出手是三分球, 而本季高達72%。這是個驚人的進步。 But shooting more from the perimeter because it's necessary to coexist with Monroe and Drummond has proved trickier. 但如果多投外線的理由是這是為了配合三塔陣容,多投外線的決定就變得十分微妙。 With a conventional lineup featuring Smith at power forward, he should rarely shoot from the perimeter. He's not very good at it but is a strong finisher near the basket. Typically, getting looks in the paint should be his focus. 在Smith擔任大前鋒的傳統陣容,Smith應該少投外線因為他並不擅長外線。 而他在籃框附近是個很好的進攻終點。所以理論上Smith應該在禁區找尋機會。 My three-point plan for Smith came purely from necessity to facilitate Joe Dumars' mad-scientist frontcourt. 我(Feldman)要Smith多投三分純粹是為了配合Dumars的瘋狂前場組合實驗。 But Smith is not taking his three-pointers because he's playing with Monroe and Drummond. 可是Smith並不是因為配合三塔陣容而出投三分。 Despite playing just 43% of his minutes without the Monroe-Drummond combo, Smith has taken 53% of his three-pointers during those stretches, according to nbawowy. 根據nbawowy,在Smith的上場時間中有43%是三塔陣容,但他只有53%的三分球 出手是在這段時間。 No, Josh, no. 別啊Josh~~~! When Monroe or Drummond sit, that means Smith is playing power forward. Again, Smith should rarely drift to the perimeter as a power forward. 不擺三塔的時候時候表示Smith是大前鋒,那他應該幾乎不投外線才對。 I still have no issue with Smith somewhat regularly attempting three-pointers when playing with Monroe and Drummond. It's problematic only in other lineups. 對於Smith在三塔一起上場時投三分我還是一點意見都沒有。問題出在其他時候。 Hopefully, this is just an early season bump. It could be that Maurice Cheeks has not yet installed sets designed to get Smith in the paint while playing power forward. So in the absence of different offensive plays, it’d be reasonable on Smith's part to play power forward in the same style as small forward. 希望這只是剛開季的小問題。可能是Cheeks還沒設定好Smith打大前鋒時 在禁區的戰術。所以在沒有第二套進攻戰術的情況下,Smith還是打得像 小前鋒。 That's correctable. No first-year head coach can implement everything at once. 這是可以修正的。沒有菜鳥教練可以一次改善所有問題。 But if Smith is just jacking more threes without the Monroe-Drummond combo because he can — without at least one of those top players, Smith likely has the ball more — the Pistons have a bigger problem. 但如果Smith只是覺得他投得進所以在不擺三塔的時候投三分,那這問題就更大了。 It's too early to know which predicament the Pistons face, so the situation needs monitoring. 到底原因是什麼還有待查證。 For Smith, there are two types of three-pointers: those with Monroe and Drummond on the court and those with at least one on the bench. 對於Smith而言,三分出手時機有兩種:三塔陣容/非三塔陣容。 Smith probably is taking enough of the former but should take way fewer of the latter. 前者已經夠了,後者則該減少。 =================== 深夜無聊(?!)翻個外電 剛翻到一半還手殘按到發表文章 幸好沒人看到,呼~~~ 祈禱下禮拜有機化學考試順利 在此先獻上祭品了,要是考得好再翻個十篇吧! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 210.60.122.1 ※ 編輯: eric00611 來自: 210.60.122.1 (11/23 04:00) ※ 編輯: eric00611 來自: 210.60.122.1 (11/23 04:03) ※ 編輯: eric00611 來自: 210.60.122.1 (11/23 04:11) 唉呀看來深夜精神狀況不太好,自己又把文章讀了兩遍,抓到好多錯啊QQ 麻煩各位版友再幫忙檢查一下... ※ 編輯: eric00611 來自: 210.60.122.1 (11/23 04:18)

11/23 07:58, , 1F
推!
11/23 07:58, 1F

11/23 08:02, , 2F
所有球評或帶過JSmoove的教練應該都提過希望他能減少
11/23 08:02, 2F

11/23 08:03, , 3F
三分的出手數...但他似乎越投越多了XD 可能也是因為打
11/23 08:03, 3F

11/23 08:04, , 4F
小前鋒位置的關係..進攻方式被迫往外拉
11/23 08:04, 4F

11/23 08:06, , 5F
所以看到這篇新聞的統計數據還蠻意外的...
11/23 08:06, 5F

11/23 08:25, , 6F
溪蛙:Josh for 333333333333333 (揮毛巾)
11/23 08:25, 6F

11/23 10:12, , 7F
推!!
11/23 10:12, 7F

11/23 10:24, , 8F
Singler的三分怎麼可以那麼慘..剛剛又麵包 而且差很多
11/23 10:24, 8F

11/23 10:24, , 9F
今天放棄3塔了嗎?
11/23 10:24, 9F

11/23 10:38, , 10F
放棄三塔感覺不是正確的 畢竟Smith是有能力打SF的y
11/23 10:38, 10F

11/23 10:45, , 11F
第四節末段還是好鳥..
11/23 10:45, 11F

11/23 10:46, , 12F
哀哀 落後ing~
11/23 10:46, 12F

11/23 10:46, , 13F
一直失誤..........................................
11/23 10:46, 13F

11/23 10:49, , 14F
可惜阿
11/23 10:49, 14F

11/23 10:53, , 15F
第四節末看到吐血
11/23 10:53, 15F

11/23 11:06, , 16F
建寧快攻被巴火鍋後就崩盤
11/23 11:06, 16F

11/23 14:56, , 17F
推!!
11/23 14:56, 17F
文章代碼(AID): #1IZxPyoy (Pistons)
文章代碼(AID): #1IZxPyoy (Pistons)