[新聞] Ellsbury remains on bench with injury

看板RedSox作者時間17年前 (2008/08/15 07:49), 編輯推噓9(9043)
留言52則, 11人參與, 7年前最新討論串1/1
08/14/2008 6:51 PM ET Bruised tailbone continues to bother Sox center fielder By Mark Remme / MLB.com BOSTON -- Jacoby Ellsbury was not in the starting lineup Thursday for the Sox's series finale with the Texas Rangers, marking the third consecutive night the speedy rookie did not start. Ellsbury originally was in Tuesday's lineup for the opener against the Rangers, but was scratched just before game time with a bruised tailbone, stemming from being hit by a John Danks pitch on Monday in Chicago. Manager Terry Francona said it's nothing to be alarmed about, just a way to give him time to recover. "I think he's doing much better," Francona said. "I watched him yesterday sitting on one of those self-made cushions. He looked like Larry Bird." Ellsbury walked while pinch-hitting for Kevin Cash in Tuesday's 19-17 win over the Rangers, crossing the plate with the game-tying run in the eighth. Despite his efforts, Francona is being patient. "I think he's fine to play tonight. He got in the game the other night, and he actually ran real well. But it was a chore to get him to that point, so we gave him last night, we'll give him tonight. "The biggest hurdle he was looking at was sliding. [He] kind of worked himself into a position knowing he can get down." Francona inserted Coco Crisp into the lineup the past two nights, and Crisp was in the lineup again Thursday -- batting eighth and playing center field. Ellsbury was batting .526 over his past five games, with two homers and three stolen bases. It was a turning point for the rookie, who slumped through much of July and lost his spot as the leadoff hitter -- a spot Francona adamantly says he'll regain in the future. The pitch Ellsbury took in the tailbone happened in the in the sixth inning, and it broke up a perfect game bid by Danks. The Sox would eventually win that game against the White Sox, 5-1. "It's nothing more than a bruise, but he's got it on a part of the body that hurts," Francona said. "He'll be OK." -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.160.68.115

08/15 09:01, , 1F
結果還是上場...
08/15 09:01, 1F

08/15 09:05, , 2F
He'll be ok......bullshit-_-
08/15 09:05, 2F

08/15 09:12, , 3F
領先那麼多分為什麼還要讓他上...= =
08/15 09:12, 3F

08/15 09:25, , 4F
我是覺得,教練是最接近也最了解球員狀況的人,我們單憑
08/15 09:25, 4F

08/15 09:25, , 5F
新聞的二手資訊其實也沒什麼立場質疑教練的決定
08/15 09:25, 5F

08/15 09:28, , 6F
問題在他沒有先發的原因就是受傷阿...然後0:9叫上來
08/15 09:28, 6F

08/15 09:28, , 7F
推樓上 傷兵在0:9的時候硬是架上來幹麻?
08/15 09:28, 7F

08/15 09:33, , 8F
我的意思是,傷兵是記者寫的,傷勢狀況的嚴重與否現場最
08/15 09:33, 8F

08/15 09:34, , 9F
清楚,或許讓他完整的休息一天很好,或許傷勢經過觀察也
08/15 09:34, 9F

08/15 09:34, , 10F
如果傷勢真的讓他不能先發的話 那領先9分讓他上來更沒意義
08/15 09:34, 10F

08/15 09:34, , 11F
經沒問題了,或許Drew當時比Ellsbury更需要休息,為什麼
08/15 09:34, 11F

08/15 09:34, , 12F
可是9:0就算只是小傷,換他上來是...
08/15 09:34, 12F

08/15 09:35, , 13F
已經都不適合先發了 在0:9上來補更奇怪不是?
08/15 09:35, 13F

08/15 09:35, , 14F
Francona要換Ellsbury我不知道,但我們不用只因為看了條
08/15 09:35, 14F

08/15 09:36, , 15F
覺得沒問題就會讓他先發吧?在這麼缺人手的時候
08/15 09:36, 15F

08/15 09:36, , 16F
問題是不適合先發都已經是事實了
08/15 09:36, 16F

08/15 09:36, , 17F
新聞就去質疑現場的決定 (XD 我承認我反應過度啦)
08/15 09:36, 17F

08/15 09:36, , 18F
今天如果差距在三分以內派他上來替補我沒意見 九分耶
08/15 09:36, 18F

08/15 09:38, , 19F
跟你說吧...昨天我們下放投手 Pauley 叫 Bailey 上來
08/15 09:38, 19F

08/15 09:38, , 20F
Lowell的例子還在前幾天不是嗎?受傷硬上
08/15 09:38, 20F

08/15 09:39, , 21F
Bailey 可以守左外野 幹麼不用 Bay可以去右外野阿
08/15 09:39, 21F

08/15 09:40, , 22F
我就不信連續三天沒先發 0:9傷就好了
08/15 09:40, 22F

08/15 09:40, , 23F
他可以和紅一中結拜了
08/15 09:40, 23F

08/15 09:41, , 24F
Ellsbury第一次連三天沒先發 情況不像是沒傷吧
08/15 09:41, 24F

08/15 09:45, , 25F
因為看到打線超熱所以細胞超活性化 就好了....
08/15 09:45, 25F

08/15 09:47, , 26F
話說我又仔細看了這篇,Tito在第4段一開頭就說今晚可能會
08/15 09:47, 26F

08/15 09:48, , 27F
幹,他一定有吃班龍完
08/15 09:48, 27F

08/15 09:49, , 28F
上啊! 看來應該就是傷勢恢復得差不多了
08/15 09:49, 28F

08/15 09:50, , 29F
沒上DL的傷我們應該就不用太在意吧! 畢竟花錢的是紅襪隊
08/15 09:50, 29F

08/15 09:50, , 30F
不是我們,球團應該會比我們小球迷更小心吧
08/15 09:50, 30F

08/15 09:50, , 31F
你看看Lowell...本季等著暴銷
08/15 09:50, 31F

08/15 09:51, , 32F
Lowell兩個月以來都沒上過DL
08/15 09:51, 32F

08/15 09:52, , 33F
因為都是小傷 然後持續上場
08/15 09:52, 33F

08/15 09:54, , 34F
B大,我也不是想護航Tito的決定,但你我都沒看過球員們的
08/15 09:54, 34F

08/15 09:57, , 35F
檢查報告,我只是想提一個觀念,我們接觸到的資訊都不是
08/15 09:57, 35F

08/15 09:58, , 36F
第一手,接近不了事實,很難幫助我們判斷,不是不能質疑
08/15 09:58, 36F

08/15 09:59, , 37F
不管有沒有看到 球員的傷是會一直累積的 適當的休息本
08/15 09:59, 37F

08/15 09:59, , 38F
來就是應該的 如果今天比數咬很緊 需要守備或是打擊時
08/15 09:59, 38F

08/15 09:59, , 39F
如果早在開賽前Francona就說他可能會讓Ellsbury上場,
08/15 09:59, 39F

08/15 10:00, , 40F
派小帥哥上 我沒意見 畢竟小派也常休息日派上來代打
08/15 10:00, 40F

08/15 10:00, , 41F
那我想我們也沒什麼好批評的,因為他手上的資訊一定比我們多
08/15 10:00, 41F

08/15 10:00, , 42F
但已經9:0了..意義到底在何處 有待商議
08/15 10:00, 42F

08/15 10:01, , 43F
只是我們拿個二手資料去質疑掌握前線訊息的Tito,有失公允
08/15 10:01, 43F

08/15 10:02, , 44F
那幹麼不給 Ellsbury 先發?
08/15 10:02, 44F

08/15 10:03, , 45F
我今天才發現我終於能在BASEBALL推文了
08/15 10:03, 45F

08/15 10:04, , 46F
昨天都還不能推 今天是我PTT使用一歲生日^ ^
08/15 10:04, 46F

08/15 10:04, , 47F
一半一半就當休息吧
08/15 10:04, 47F

08/15 10:06, , 48F
老實說Bailey的守備還是不要守好
08/15 10:06, 48F

08/15 10:07, , 49F
XD
08/15 10:07, 49F

08/15 10:18, , 50F
桌球輸了 哭哭 沒牌..
08/15 10:18, 50F

11/04 00:02, , 51F
如果早在開賽前Fran https://daxiv.com
11/04 00:02, 51F

12/28 20:19, 7年前 , 52F
清楚,或許讓他完整的休 https://noxiv.com
12/28 20:19, 52F
文章代碼(AID): #18fCIHlA (RedSox)
文章代碼(AID): #18fCIHlA (RedSox)