[情報] Boras on Ellsbury

看板RedSox作者 (上大聯盟啦 爽)時間12年前 (2013/09/06 18:07), 編輯推噓98(980148)
留言246則, 48人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Boras compares Ellsbury to Carl Crawford (and an aircraft carrier) http://0rz.tw/bFweG The Red Sox have keen interest in re-signing star center fielder Jacoby Ellsbury, according to people familiar with their thinking. However, Red Sox connected people are suggesting now that if Ellsbury's market goes well into the nine-figure arena – and considering their own $142 million deal for Carl Crawford three winters ago among other comps, it could happen – they aren't necessarily optimistic that Boston will be able to retain him. 根據對紅襪策略思考熟悉的人表示,紅襪很有興趣和Ellsbury簽約。「不過」,相關人士 表示如果Ellsbury不只進入九位數的世界還進入很深的話─被尻佛$142M毒藥約嚇到的紅 襪再簽約的機會不樂觀。 ($100M數量級) The Red Sox tried to re-sign Ellsbury sometime before this season, and all indications are they will try again. The issue is whether they have interest in getting into a bidding war that could go easily past the $100 million mark, well past it if you listen to Ellsbury's agent Scott Boras' words Thursday. 紅襪在季前試圖重簽,而各方消息也指出紅襪會再試一次。但是照著Boras的說法,無論 紅襪有沒有意願加入搶人大戰,總價碼都會遠超過九位數大關。 Boston had huge success dealing last winter in what's been dubbed the “ mid-range” market, scoring big with its deals for Shane Victorino, Mike Napoli and others, and that strategy may be weighing on them. It's no surprise there are people within the Red Sox hierarchy who aren't anxious to return to the $100 million-plus type deals that haven't always paid off for them. 上一個冬天紅襪在「中階市場」中打了漂亮的一仗,Shane Victorino、Mike Napoli等人 成了策略中的主角。所以出現認為不急著去和不見得成功的$100M等級球員簽約的紅襪人 也不令人意外。 Boras, in an interview with CBSSports.com, made clear what he thinks of the “ mid-range” market strategy and where he thinks Ellsbury stands, saying, “ Free agency is like the Navy. You can have a number of mid-range missiles, but they only work as long as you have the aircraft carrier to put them on.” Boras在CBSSports.com的訪談中聲明他對「中階市場策略」以及Ellsbury價值的想法: 「自由球員就向海軍,你可以擁有一些中程飛彈,但是那要有航母來載才有用。」 "I think any team would say in a perfect world they would stick to shorter-term deals," Red Sox general manager Ben Cherington said Thursday. "There's always exceptions. We obviously made an exception in [Dustin] Pedroia's case." Ben Cherington在今天提及:「我想任何一支球隊都只想短約,只是總是有例外。顯然 小派就是其中一個例子。」 The Red Sox gave Pedroia an eight-year, $110 million deal when they signed him to an extension in July. 紅襪在七月跟小派簽了一紙八年、$110M的合約。 The implication in Boras' comment is that Ellsbury is an aircraft carrier. While some may not view him as a mega star, as Boras pointed out he is a former winner of a Gold Glove award and a Silver Slugger who's again leading his league in stolen bases. Boras的「暗示」中,Ellsbury就是航母。雖然一些人不認為他是巨星,不過Boras表示 他可是前金手套得主、銀棒獎得主而且今年再度成為盜壘王領先者。 Some may point to Ellsbury's inability to get back to the slugging form of 2011, when he led the American League in total bases and finished second in MVP voting to Justin Verlander despite the Red Sox's historic collapse, but Boras points to Ellsbury's many attributes in positioning him as a major star in this marketplace, specifically noting his ability to steal 50 bases, score 100 runs and post a .750-plus OPS. 一些人認為Ellsbury再也無法像2011年那樣幹球─那年壘打數美聯第一,而且雖然身處黑 暗的2011年卻依然拿到MVP第二名─但是Boras表示他的各種貢獻讓他在市場上擁有巨星地 位,特別是50盜能力、得分100分以及超越.750 OPS的組合。 A couple executives on other teams mentioned B.J. Upton, who got a $75.2 million, five-year deal, as a possible free-agent comp, but that may be a management-leaning guess considering Upton's lack of consistency and low batting averages even before this year. (Yet other execs say they believe he'll indeed get nine figures). 一些他隊經理表示Ellsbury可能會像B.J. Upton一樣拿到五年$75.2M,但是那可能是帶隊 考量的猜測─因為Upton穩定性不佳,打擊率也不高。(也有其他人說九位數正常)。 *** 在此補充Mark Polishuk的文章 http://t.co/WTW6wQFUGm Some executives tell Heyman that Ellsbury could be in line for a five-year/$75MM deal like B.J. Upton while others think the Boston outfielder will indeed crack the $100MM mark. My guess is that Ellsbury seems like a lock for a $100MM+ contract on the open market this offseason due to both his talents and because this winter's free agent outfielder market is rather slim. MLBTR's Tim Dierkes has had Ellsbury rated no lower than third throughout his 2014 Free Agent Power Rankings since the season began, and Ellsbury has claimed the No. 2 position (behind only Robinson Cano) for the last two months. 有些經理告訴Heyman說Ellsbury會拿到B.J. Upton等級的約,有些則說會拿超過$100M─ 尤其是他有一定的天份,更重要的是今年的外野手市場很小。Tim Dierkes在2014的FA Power Rankings中從沒把Ellsbury放到前三名之外,近兩個月更是都在第二名(輸Cano)。 I used the Crawford deal as a comparison myself when I examined Ellsbury as a possible extension candidate back in March 2012. At the time Ellsbury was coming off the best season of his career -- a .321/.376/.552 slash line, 32 homers, 39 steals, 119 runs scored and a league-leading 364 total bases. Since then, Ellsbury has hit .287/.340/.403 with just 12 homers over 941 PA, though his 2012 season was limited to only 74 games due to injury. 2012年三月時,我個人用尻佛來比價,當時Ellsbury剛打出生涯年:.321/.376/.552、 32轟、39盜、119分以及聯盟第一的364TB。2012年因為受傷只打74場(941PA);成績縮水 到.287/.340/.403、12轟。 My proposal at the time was a seven-year, $133MM deal between Ellsbury and the Red Sox that would have covered Ellsbury's 2013 season and his first six free agent years. Ellsbury hasn't kept up the power since then and he turns 30 years old next week. As we saw with Michael Bourn (another Boras client) last offseason, teams are hesitant to give major deals to speed-centric players entering their thirties. 那時我的建議是七年$133M,涵蓋了今年球季以及接下來的六年。Ellsbury之後並沒有拿 出一樣的砲瓦出來,而我們也能看到Michael Bourn(也是Bora$客戶)上季的狀況,各隊 對於要不要簽下以速度為主的30歲球員感到相當遲疑。 *** Boras, meantime, suggested that not only is Upton not in the ballpark but that even Crawford comes up short as a player, as well. Jayson Werth's $126 million, seven-year deal may help Ellsbury's case, too, but Crawford is the one who seems obvious to mention since he's a speed player like Ellsbury, and more to the point, that was Boston's own deal. 不過Boras表示Ellsbury跟Upton不同等級,尻佛也比不上Ellsbury。Jayson Werth的七年 $126M似乎可以拿來參考,不過尻佛跟Ellsbury一樣都是以速度為主的外野手,而且都是 紅襪的球員。 “Two things separate Ellsbury [from Crawford]. Carl Crawford was never proven as a leadoff hitter, and Carl Crawford is not a center fielder,'' Boras said. “They are two different animals. It's not a consideration because he's a corner outfielder. Just think if Carl Crawford could play center field.” 「兩人不同的地方在於:尻佛並沒有證明他能穩坐首棒打者,而且他不是中外野手、是左 外野手。想像一下如果尻佛可以站CF的情形。」Boras說道。 Boras went on to mention a few other differences between Ellsbury and Crawford. “Carl Crawford never had success in Boston. And he never won a ring in Boston,'' Boras said. Plus, "Crawford never hit twenty home runs, and Jacoby hit 30," Boras added. 「尻佛不曾在紅襪取得成功、不曾在波士頓拿過戒指,還有尻佛從沒單季20轟過,而 Ellsbury打過30支。」 Boras also said that Ellsbury's "ceilings" of 30 homers (32 to be precise) and 70 stolen bases, though done in different years, are "unheard of." Plus, Boras pointed out that Ellsbury's .927 steal percentage this year ranks among the best alltime for someone with 50 attempts, and that few of the best best basestealers have been center fielders. Boras還說Ellsbury的「天花板」是30轟70盜,這是從沒看過的事情。(不過這兩個紀錄 不是在同一年),還有超過50盜的球員中,Ellsbury擁有最高的.927成功率;更重要的是 很少有頂尖盜壘者是中外野手。 Ellsbury won a ring with the Red Sox in 2007, hitting .438 in the World Series with a 1.188 OPS, and his overall career postseason average is .261. 2007年世界大賽中Ellsbury繳出.438打擊率、1.188 OPS的成績;生涯季後賽打擊率.261。 It's been quite a positive run for him in Boston. But it's quite possible he may not be so long for Boston. Ellsbury在紅襪的表現很優異,但也有可能要告一段落了。 Word is that owner Red Sox John Henry, who just saved himself some money with the eminently reasonable deal for star second baseman Pedroia, very much likes Ellsbury, and Ellsbury is said to have interest in staying, as well. But like usual it may come down to dollars and cents. 剛從小派合約省下不少錢的John Henry表示他很喜歡Ellsbury,而Ellsbury也有續留意願 。不幸的是最後通常由錢決定結果。 It isn't known what Boston's offer was last winter, but Boston's baseball executives are said to continue to see merit in their “mid-range” winter strategy of a year ago, which is no surprise since it's helped catapult them into first place after their rough 2012 season. 現在仍不清楚紅襪上次給的合約內容,不過據說紅襪有意延續今年靠著「中階」市場得到 成功的策略。今年如此的成功,會延續這種策略不令人意外。 And Boston honchos seemed to be preparing for the possibility of losing Ellsbury when they held tight to center field prospect Jackie Bradley Jr. at the trade deadline. They instead traded shortstop Jose Iglesias quite possibly in part because of their worries about an Ellsbury defection. One Boston-connected person said he believes Bradley is even better in center than Ellsbury, though it's obvious Bradley is as yet unproven as a major-league hitter. 還有紅襪也已經準備好Ellsbury走時的備案─Jackie Bradley。他們選擇交易掉鷹俠,正 是因為怕失去Ellsbury。有些紅襪相關人士甚至相信JBJ比Ellsbury更優,雖然他還是個 尚未證明身手的菜鳥。 The one knock on Elllsbury, other than he's showed big power in only one year, has been about his ability to stay healthy. But while he's missed significant time in two seasons, Boras pointed out that his injuries were related to freak mishaps. 除了砲瓦只在一年出現之外,另一個疑慮是健康問題。但雖然他有兩季缺賽很久,但 Boras指出那是意外。 “He has the genetics, like Johnny Damon. He's a durable player,” Boras said. “The only [significant] injuries he's had are collision injuries. They were due to exterior forces.” 「他有著像Damon一樣的基因,他是個耐操的球員。他受到的大傷都是因碰撞造成的─都 是外力。」 Speaking of exterior forces, the issue ultimately will be about the marketplace. 說到外力,這個問題最終會影響市場價值。 Ellsbury hasn't hurt himself with a typical season at age 29; he's hitting .296 with eight homers, 51 stolen bases, 88 runs and a .775 OPS. Those are very close to his career averages. His career percentages are .297 and .788, and in his three previous full seasons, he's averaged 104 runs, 53 stolen bases and 16 home runs (including his big 2011). Ellsbury在典型的球季(29歲,今年)時沒有受傷,他打出.296、八轟、51盜、88分以及 .775 OPS,這跟生涯平均(.297 BA, .788 OPS)很接近;過去三個完整球季的平均則是 104分、53盜、16轟。 The market should aid Ellsbury since many teams are awash in cash following another profitable year, and few stars populate the marketplace. After free-agent gem Robinson Cano, Ellsbury is seen as the player likely to land the next biggest contract. Among outfielders, there isn't a deep roster but rather a select few stars, including also Shin-Soo Choo, Hunter Pence, Nelson Cruz, Carlos Beltran and Curtis Granderson. Ellsbury的市場價值應該會隨其他球隊的搶奪而水漲船高,也少有球員能爭搶他的市場地 位;Ellsbury很有可能成為第二貴的FA( < Cano);剩下的外野手FA只有Shin-Soo Choo, Hunter Pence, Nelson Cruz, Carlos Beltran and Curtis Granderson。 -- Athletic frame. High baseball IQ. Xander Smooth, fluid swing. Bogaerts Elite batspeed. #01 Strong and explosive hands. Above-average-to-better power ceiling, potential 30 home run bat. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.46.132.47

09/06 18:22, , 1F
推 所以Ells會不會續留還是得看吸血鬼的牙齒會有多尖銳
09/06 18:22, 1F

09/06 18:32, , 2F
133M? 100M都要考慮了
09/06 18:32, 2F

09/06 18:33, , 3F
簡單的說門檻是100M 我只能說要唱分手快樂了么
09/06 18:33, 3F

09/06 18:42, , 4F
科科 前車之鑑就在不久前
09/06 18:42, 4F

09/06 19:02, , 5F
在打個幾年100RBI的話給他沒差 QQ
09/06 19:02, 5F

09/06 19:03, , 6F
要133M 短約買個Carlos Beltran等雜魚長大吧
09/06 19:03, 6F

09/06 19:36, , 7F
不然也可以試試韓籍大槍
09/06 19:36, 7F

09/06 19:37, , 8F
如果是Upton等級的約就好了
09/06 19:37, 8F

09/06 19:38, , 9F
價碼要求太高的話,以目前紅襪外野的人手應該沒必要簽
09/06 19:38, 9F

09/06 19:38, , 10F
Let us see
09/06 19:38, 10F

09/06 20:11, , 11F
問題就出在開了先例簽尻佛那個爛約
09/06 20:11, 11F

09/06 20:12, , 12F
不論還有沒有power明顯比尻佛好的Ells就變的怎麼開都尷尬
09/06 20:12, 12F

09/06 20:20, , 13F
秋信守也是Boras的客戶,川叔不知道還是嗎,如過Cano沒
09/06 20:20, 13F

09/06 20:21, , 14F
換經紀人,今年野手頂級貨都是他的客戶
09/06 20:21, 14F

09/06 20:36, , 15F
這季末沒那市場啦 這記者是出名的Boras發話筒
09/06 20:36, 15F

09/06 20:39, , 16F
1. Pedroia合約擺在那 2. JBJ MLB ready (不要酸我)
09/06 20:39, 16F

09/06 20:40, , 17F
躲人天使沒位置、洋基沒錢,紅襪進可攻退可守
09/06 20:40, 17F

09/06 20:43, , 18F
開個 5yrs/$80M 就很誠意了
09/06 20:43, 18F

09/06 20:44, , 19F
有尻佛的前車之鑑 還會用超過9位數簽一個腿哥嗎?
09/06 20:44, 19F

09/06 20:44, , 20F
況且底下還有一個JBJ
09/06 20:44, 20F

09/06 20:45, , 21F
超過小派就沒簽的價值了
09/06 20:45, 21F

09/06 20:46, , 22F
我想知道過9位數哪隊會簽?
09/06 20:46, 22F

09/06 20:47, , 23F
5Y 90M差不多....
09/06 20:47, 23F

09/06 20:48, , 24F
呃 我打錯了 應該說用九位數簽
09/06 20:48, 24F

09/06 20:52, , 25F
JBJ有ready嗎
09/06 20:52, 25F

09/06 21:10, , 26F
別忘了JBJ沒打過3A 開季是從2A直升..不是每個人都練武奇才..
09/06 21:10, 26F

09/06 21:12, , 27F
回去3A練等後 374PA .275/.374/.469 這不是相當差的數字...
09/06 21:12, 27F

09/06 21:26, , 28F
當然會希望Ellsbury能留下來,但價碼太高的話也只好忍痛了
09/06 21:26, 28F

09/06 21:54, , 29F
90/5真的可以考慮..看他本人願不願給Hometown Discount
09/06 21:54, 29F

09/06 21:57, , 30F
應該所有襪迷都希望Ellsbury留下,但之前慘痛教訓時再讓人
09/06 21:57, 30F

09/06 21:57, , 31F
映象深刻...所以如果太大張真的只好說再見了
09/06 21:57, 31F

09/06 22:10, , 32F
尻佛的約是Theo簽的 不影響現在的報價 可惜歸可惜
09/06 22:10, 32F

09/06 22:11, , 33F
但襪子的確沒有非簽小帥哥的壓力在 30歲的腿哥 九位數太多了
09/06 22:11, 33F

09/06 22:12, , 34F
洋基開再高一定得跟......其他隊就算了...感覺留不住QQ
09/06 22:12, 34F

09/06 22:21, , 35F
貴森森的話 球團不要腦衝
09/06 22:21, 35F

09/06 22:24, , 36F
超過小派的合約 連考慮都不用考慮直接放走吧
09/06 22:24, 36F

09/06 22:25, , 37F
對付波拉斯這種吸血鬼 就是讓他有行無市
09/06 22:25, 37F

09/06 22:30, , 38F
洋基不太可能會開天價搶他 略高Upton的約就很有誠意了
09/06 22:30, 38F
(改一下錯字) ※ 編輯: XBogaerts 來自: 114.46.132.47 (09/06 22:32)
還有 168 則推文
09/08 00:04, , 207F
常常有人(非針對)覺得下面有個頂級新秀就能抗助未來
09/08 00:04, 207F

09/08 00:04, , 208F
JBJ已經算是風險很小的新秀了
09/08 00:04, 208F

09/08 00:05, , 209F
Hassan Hazelbaker JBJ 三個只有JBJ養起來的話機率當
09/08 00:05, 209F

09/08 00:05, , 210F
然不到50% 可是能這樣看嗎
09/08 00:05, 210F

09/08 00:05, , 211F
印象比較深刻的是之前的1B,常常有人說要接1B或老爹位子
09/08 00:05, 211F

09/08 00:05, , 212F
慘到現在我名子都忘了
09/08 00:05, 212F

09/08 00:06, , 213F
Lars Anderson和JBJ狀況根本不同
09/08 00:06, 213F

09/08 00:06, , 214F
Lars Anderson?
09/08 00:06, 214F

09/08 00:06, , 215F
Lars是高中畢業生 在A+打出很漂亮的成績後在AA被殺爆
09/08 00:06, 215F

09/08 00:07, , 216F
好吧,我承認我不太了解...
09/08 00:07, 216F

09/08 00:07, , 217F
JBJ現在是已經在AAA打出好成績了
09/08 00:07, 217F

09/08 00:07, , 218F
我是說Lars沒錯
09/08 00:07, 218F

09/08 00:08, , 219F
說到1B除了養Lars失敗,倒是成功了Anthony Rizzo
09/08 00:08, 219F

09/08 00:10, , 220F
Kalish和Reddick??
09/08 00:10, 220F

09/08 00:11, , 221F
是說Reddick現在也還不錯啦,Kalish我都忘了在哪了..
09/08 00:11, 221F

09/08 00:12, , 222F
Kalish碰到的問題是受傷 這種問題誰來都一樣
09/08 00:12, 222F

09/08 00:13, , 223F
Ellsbury的受傷風險也不會比unproven的低
09/08 00:13, 223F

09/08 00:14, , 224F
查了一下Reddick今年.658爛死了,最好一年還是前年在紅襪
09/08 00:14, 224F

09/08 00:17, , 225F
不是有痛痛人的說法? 還是真的是運氣?
09/08 00:17, 225F

09/08 00:17, , 226F
Reddick去年在綠帽很威吧.. 幹了30發 還拿個GG
09/08 00:17, 226F

09/08 00:19, , 227F
今年就鳥掉啦,.658承上329個AB,你願意再給多少AB?
09/08 00:19, 227F

09/08 00:21, , 228F
32發也不過.76,是很不錯,但是沒有32發帳面上看起來威
09/08 00:21, 228F

09/08 00:22, , 229F
狠一點把西多土放進來...已經連續3個OF failure了
09/08 00:22, 229F

09/08 00:22, , 230F
也許JBJ會不一樣,希望這樣,連四就太衰了
09/08 00:22, 230F

09/08 00:23, , 231F
可以這樣比? 那養魚幹嘛 全部都丟了
09/08 00:23, 231F

09/08 00:26, , 232F
JBJ是我們自家在Ellsbury之後最好的OF農作物.....
09/08 00:26, 232F

09/08 00:26, , 233F
我只是表達有風險而已,養當然還是養阿
09/08 00:26, 233F

09/08 00:26, , 234F
西多土還來不及證明自己就碰到怪病了
09/08 00:26, 234F

09/08 00:26, , 235F
要這樣比小聯盟可以全廢了
09/08 00:26, 235F

09/08 00:26, , 236F
然後要講痛痛人的話 真不知道現在是Ellsbury比較痛還
09/08 00:26, 236F

09/08 00:26, , 237F
JBJ - -
09/08 00:26, 237F

09/08 00:26, , 238F
誰不知道有風險? 問題就是風險有高有低
09/08 00:26, 238F

09/08 00:26, , 239F
帥哥又痛了...
09/08 00:26, 239F

09/08 00:28, , 240F
JBJ的健康狀態和完成度已經讓他的風險降到相對低了
09/08 00:28, 240F

09/08 00:29, , 241F
就算7/130million簽下Ells,能保證他7年,年年 OPS850?
09/08 00:29, 241F

09/08 00:30, , 242F
恩,那很好,那就上來試吧
09/08 00:30, 242F

09/08 00:31, , 243F
不要太多延伸... 我沒有要廢小聯盟也沒有要130M簽Ells
09/08 00:31, 243F

09/08 00:34, , 244F
(沒冒犯的意思)這樣講Reddick的話..那當初把Brandon Moss丟
09/08 00:34, 244F

09/08 00:34, , 245F
我也沒有反對用JBJ和不簽Ells,這討論就到這吧
09/08 00:34, 245F

09/08 00:34, , 246F
掉也很可惜.
09/08 00:34, 246F
文章代碼(AID): #1IAQbN1T (RedSox)
文章代碼(AID): #1IAQbN1T (RedSox)