[情報] Career advice for Billy, and a hero' …

看板Rockets (休士頓 火箭)作者 (5ive)時間19年前 (2007/01/25 00:05), 編輯推噓7(709)
留言16則, 8人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://blogs.chron.com/nba/2007/01/career_advice_for_billy_and_a.html January 23, 2007 Career advice for Billy, and a hero's tribute for Dikembe For all his frustration -- perhaps you've heard -- I have been struck in recent weeks at how cordial Billy Spanoulis has been. Every day, he comes in, offers a big smile, asks how I'm doing. It's just small talk, common courtesy. But you know how it is when you see someone every day. Pretty soon you nod, maybe grunt. It all becomes perfunctory. Professional athletes learn that to say hello is to invite inquiries. This guy is endlessly courteous. I've heard that once he got through the holidays and the Rockets started winning, he seemed less morose at practice, working harder with a better attitude, too. So since he has been such a good guy, I thought it was time to offer a bit of career advice. Want to play more, Billy? Here's a tip. Play better. Funny how that works. Now I do like Billy, and I believe he has a future in the league. But it always sounds wrong when a Chris Webber frets about playing time. When you're a rookie, having invested a half-season in your NBA career, having done nothing, absolutely nothing, in the league, you don't get to complain. You go to work. You pay your dues. Then you work some more. In all of Billy's chats with the media -- with me last month, Fran last week, the Greek paper over the weekend, a few locals on Monday and many more on Tuesday -- he has expressed his frustration clearly. It is understandable that he would feel this way. He talked about continuing to practice hard and said that he wishes to help his team. But in all these talks, we have heard precious little about playing better. The truth is that Spanoulis did play. Let's say it again -- he did play. Not much, but enough to have had a chance to play well enough to earn more playing time. With one exception, he played his way back to the bench. In the preseason, his play was just awful. During his brief regular-season stint in the rotation, he shot 22 percent. The Rockets collapsed during his time on the floor. The team lost games. The notion that he is not playing because he is a rookie makes absolutely no sense. He was not benched in favor of Rod Strickland or Mark Jackson. John Lucas, a veteran of 13 NBA games and all of 107 minutes, got the playing time that Spanoulis lost. Lucas is also on the edge of the rotation, but he and Spanoulis both got enough playing time to have earned more. Another argument that needs to be forgotten is the notion that his sublime performance in the World Championships and in the win against the United States. Had Spanoulis played poorly that day, it would not have meant that he could not play. The Rockets had already signed him. They had already decided he was a player. One game could not have demonstrated that he could not play; it cannot prove that he can. It's one game. In the NBA, almost everyone can play well for one game. And it was not an NBA game. Different rules. Different team. Different role. If the Rockets were scouting him, they would have liked what they saw, but how many guys drafted among the top picks because of the promise they showed never make it in the NBA? We're talking about players every team coveted, with tremendous physical tools, scouted down the smallest detail. It's a tough league. Spanoulis can find his way in this league. He has a nice first step and a terrific sense of how to use it. He can penetrate to his right or left, understands angles, uses his body well. He is tough and tenacious. And all his "rookie of the year" talk, or his declaration to Jeff Van Gundy that he had been his team's Tracy McGrady, might indicate a healthy confidence. But if he thinks that he is being short-changed or in any way treated unfairly, he is worse than wrong. He would be cheating himself. He would be ignoring the steps he needs to take to get what he so dearly wants. My guess is that the kid smiling and saying hello is simply feeling the pressure that comes with every phone call and email asking a national hero why he is not playing. "Everybody, everybody, because everybody knows when I came here, they brought me here to play and to have a good run on this team, and now we don't know what happened and I'm not playing," he said. "This is difficult for me. I don't have anything to do. I will make a decision. We'll see what happens." He went on. But see if you find something missing. "I make good career," he said. "I had good success with my teams. I played with the national team. We took second place. And everybody expects good things. This is logical. I can do nothing when I stay on the bench. I can do a lot when I play, but if you stay on the bench, you cannot help, you know. "It was hard, but it's my choice to come here. It was my choice. I was very good with Panathanaikos, my ex-team. I had a good time. Everything was good. It was my choice to change my lifestyle and my life to come here to play in the NBA because I was convinced I would play and I would have a good role here. I was 100 percent confident I could play good basketball here. I'm still confident and sure I can do this, but I will wait my time to play, to do what I came here to do, play and help my team. "First of all, I don't have to prove anything here. Everybody knows how I can play and what I am. I have to myself I can play here and do what the coach asks of me to help my team win." There was more, and more again is his conversation with Fran, and again before Tux & Tennies and again on Tuesday. It is easy to understand his frustration. He had a good thing going and came a long way. He is disappointed. It's only natural. But in all that and much more, did he say anything about needing to actually play better? Maybe that's what he has in mind with needing to keep working, but in all he said, he has said little about his own responsibility. Billy seems to be a good guy and a good prospect. And he is right about one thing, "basketball is basketball." If you want to play more, just play better. ‧ ‧ ‧ The Rockets' Dikembe Mutombo was saluted at the State of the Union by President Bush. It was a great moment. As we debate these topics each day, it is worth remembering heroic work that has nothing to do with blocked shots. 大意 V-span這傢伙非常有禮貌 我(Jonathan Feigen)聽說當他在過完假日且火箭開始獲勝後 他在練習時的不快看起來變少了 而且帶著更好的態度 那既然他是如此好的人 我認為是該給他生涯建議的時候了 Billy 想要上場更多嗎? 建議如下 打的更好 好笑的是它該怎麼實行 現在我確實喜歡Billy 而且相信他在聯盟裡有未來性 但是當Chris Webber擔心上場時間時 聽起來總是不對 當你是個菜鳥 在你的NBA生涯已經投資了半個賽季 在聯盟裡一事無成 你並不會開始抱怨 你會努力 然後繳了自己的學費後 繼續努力更多 在所有Billy和媒體的訪談中 他把自己的沮喪表達的很清楚 他會這樣覺得是可以理解的 他提到持續努力練習和希望幫助自己的球隊 但是在所有訪談中 我們鮮少聽到有關"打的更好"這件事 事實是Spanoulis確實有上場 讓我們再重申一次 "他有上場" 雖然時間並不多 但是已經足夠有機會打的更好並且爭取更多上場時間 但是有項例外: 他把自己打回板凳 在季前賽 他的比賽只能說是濫 在常規賽他定量的些許輪替時間中 他的命中率是22% 火箭在他在場上時形同崩壞 且隊伍輸了比賽 他沒上場是因為他是菜鳥的觀念完全不合理 他不是因為Rod Strickland 或 Mark Jackson較受到愛戴而被放在板凳上 而是John Lucas 一個打了13場共107分鐘的老鳥得到了Spanoulis喪失的上場時間 Lucas也是在輪替名單的邊緣 但是他和Spanoulis都得到足夠的上場時間來爭取更多 另一項需要被忘記的爭論是: 他在世錦賽表現出眾並且對上美國時獲得勝利 就算Spanoulis那天打的不好 也不代表他不能打 當時火箭已經簽下了他 也已經決定他是個球員 一場比賽不能展現出他不能打; 也不能證明他可以 這只是一場比賽 在NBA 幾乎每個人都能在一場比賽打的很好 而且這也不是場NBA的比賽 規則不同 隊伍不同 角色不同 如果火箭過去有探查過他 他們必定是喜歡他們所看見的 但是有多少在前幾順位被選到的傢伙是因為他們展現出來的允諾從未在NBA裡實現過? 我們說的是每個隊伍所渴望的球員: 有著驚人的體能條件 勘查到最小的細節 這是個嚴酷的聯盟 Spanoulis可以在聯盟裡找到自己的出路 他有著不錯的第一步和非常棒的第一步使用概念 它可以從左邊或右邊切入 認知角度的重要 並妥善的運用身體 他是堅韌且頑強的 而且所有他年度新人的談話和向JVG表明他是自己隊上的T-mac 或許顯示出他有著健康的自信心 但是如果他認為自己被矮化或是在任何方面上被不平等對待 那他比錯了還要遭 他這樣會是自我欺騙 他會漠視自己非常想得到的事物所需要的過程 我的猜測是 這個孩子的笑容和打招呼純粹是感受到 來自於電話 E MAIL詢問為何一個國家英雄沒上場的壓力 他說到 當我來到這裡大家都知道 他們把我帶到這裡比賽 並在這支球隊能表現良好 淡現在我們不知道發生什麼了? 而我沒上場比賽 這對我來說很艱困 我無事可做 我會做些決定 我們等著看什麼會發生 他持續著 但是看看你有沒有發現什麼遺失了 他說 我有好的生涯 我在我的隊上有很好的成功 我和國家隊一起比賽 我們得到第二名 大家都期待好的事情 這合乎邏輯 我待在板凳上時什麼都不能做 我上場時可以做很多事 但你待在板凳上 你就無法幫忙 這很艱難 但來到這裡是我的選擇 我在我的前隊伍Panathanaikos表現非常好 我有美好的時光 每件事都很好 改變我的生活習慣和生命並來到NBA打球是我的決定 這是因為我被說服我可以上場而且可以在這裡有個良好的角色 我100%有信心自己可以在這裡打好籃球 我依然有自信而且確定自己可以做到 但我會等我上場的時刻 並做我來這裡要做的: 上場並且幫助自己的球隊 首先 我並不需要在這裡證明任何東西 大家都知道我是怎樣的能打和我是怎樣的人 我告訴自己我能在這裡比賽 而且做到教練交代的事來幫助球隊贏球 在他和媒體的對話中有著更多諸此之類的議題 要了解他的沮喪是很簡單的 他過去有個好表現而且大老遠來到這 他是失望的 這都很自然 但在所有這些和甚至更多的抱怨中 他有提到任何確切要打的更好的言論嗎? 或許在他需要持續努力的同時這言論在他的腦海中 但在他所言中 他很少提到自己的責任 Billy看起來是個好人而且有好的遠景 而且他有一件事是對的: 籃球就是籃球 如果你想要打的更多, 只要打更好就好了 V-span想要獲得成功還得放下更多身段 否則他在火箭肯定待不久 最後人們充其量也只會為他是另一個打不出來歐洲球員而已... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.160.62.205

01/25 00:17, , 1F
01/25 00:17, 1F

01/25 00:23, , 2F
翻譯辛苦了.推一個^^
01/25 00:23, 2F

01/25 00:23, , 3F
7人輪替對先發或板凳都是一種折磨 不必Alston每場都打近
01/25 00:23, 3F

01/25 00:25, , 4F
希望billy能夠真的醒悟
01/25 00:25, 4F

01/25 00:25, , 5F
40分鐘吧!!! Billy會講那種話也表示他想表現 不然不用上場
01/25 00:25, 5F

01/25 00:26, , 6F
就領薪水多好...NBA也一堆簽約就擺爛的人....
01/25 00:26, 6F

01/25 00:39, , 7F
7人輪替代表一個人要上35分鐘...我們板凳好像沒那麼強?
01/25 00:39, 7F

01/25 00:43, , 8F
那是代表有人要打40+分鐘 orz
01/25 00:43, 8F

01/25 00:44, , 9F
我也看不出我們有哪個能打40分鐘以上還能維持高檔表現...
01/25 00:44, 9F

01/25 00:44, , 10F
我是覺得JVG在打嘴炮...-.-
01/25 00:44, 10F

01/25 00:50, , 11F
希望真的是嘴砲 趕快回到正常的8~9人輪替
01/25 00:50, 11F

01/25 01:02, , 12F
火箭今季一直都是八九人輪替 所謂七人輪替只是JVG接受
01/25 01:02, 12F

01/25 01:03, , 13F
訪問時嘴吧上說說的一個「或許」大陸傳媒有點放大了
01/25 01:03, 13F

01/25 01:47, , 14F
可是看看前一場的時間分配 會以為他講的七人是真的
01/25 01:47, 14F

01/25 01:51, , 15F
只希望就算這麼做也只是暫時的
01/25 01:51, 15F

01/25 09:53, , 16F
加油..希望他可以吃下15分鐘以上的時間
01/25 09:53, 16F
文章代碼(AID): #15juF0I0 (Rockets)
文章代碼(AID): #15juF0I0 (Rockets)