[情報] 火箭和黃蜂正在談Bobby Jackson和wells的交易

看板Rockets (休士頓 火箭)作者 (修身)時間18年前 (2008/02/21 10:14), 編輯推噓28(30234)
留言66則, 17人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Hornets talking about getting Rockets' Wells, James http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3255700 espn消息火箭和黃蜂考慮wells和james交易bobby jackson和添頭的交易,黃蜂可以 得到兩個老兵,而火箭可以擺脫james的垃圾合同。 Every top team in the Western Conference has made a significant move this season. Every team, that is, except the one at the very top. Well, that may be about to end. The New Orleans Hornets are on the verge of making their move. Sources have told ESPN.com that the Hornets and Houston Rockets were in serious discussions Wednesday night on a multi-player deal that would send Mike James and Bonzi Wells to New Orleans for Bobby Jackson and one or two other players. Different variations of the deal were still being worked on as of early Wednesday evening, but the deal appeared to have a better than 50-50 chance of going through, according to two sources with knowledge of the talks. Of the top six teams in the Western Conference (based upon the standings entering Wednesday night's games), only the Hornets have not made a significant move. Phoenix acquired Shaquille O'Neal, the Lakers traded for Pau Gasol , Utah acquired Kyle Korver, San Antonio signed Damon Stoudamire and Dallas traded for Jason Kidd. The Rockets, tied with Denver for seventh in the West, also have not made any big moves. The proposed Rockets-Hornets deal would give New Orleans two veteran scorers , and a little more size with Bells, off the bench. The Hornets also remain interested in re-signing forward Chris Andersen if his drug banishment is lifted by the NBA, although the wheels are turning slowly on his application for reinstatement. New Orleans also has reached out to unsigned free agent veteran P.J. Brown. This trade makes sense for the Rockets because they can get out from under James' contract, which runs through 2009-10. James, who logged a total of only 39 minutes in the past 25 games, is due to make $6 million next season and has a player option for $6.4 million the following season, while Wells ($2.3 million) comes off the books after this season. Jackson has one year remaining at $6.1 million, and the Hornets have also been trying to move Rasual Butler, who is due $3.6 and $3.9 over the next two years. It would make sense that New Orleans would try to include him in this trade, although one source indicated that Butler's inclusion was a possible sticking point because of the luxury tax implications for the Rockets. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 202.101.166.130

02/21 10:22, , 1F
算是好事嗎? 其實不大了解Jackson 板凳暴徒?
02/21 10:22, 1F

02/21 10:23, , 2F
好像是矮豆人以前的愛將之一
02/21 10:23, 2F

02/21 10:28, , 3F
不要啦...
02/21 10:28, 3F

02/21 10:43, , 4F
看不出來我們賺到什麼??不如james根斯奈德煥
02/21 10:43, 4F

02/21 10:50, , 5F
很爛的deal,沒有把MJ丟掉實在沒意義
02/21 10:50, 5F

02/21 10:52, , 6F
Wells已經習慣火箭輪轉..Jackson來也要花時間適應吧...
02/21 10:52, 6F

02/21 10:53, , 7F
Wells也不是剛來就是板凳暴徒的
02/21 10:53, 7F

02/21 10:54, , 8F
沒必要,卡一個BOBY又要重新調整輪轉名單,而且BJ防守...
02/21 10:54, 8F

02/21 10:58, , 9F
已經把MJ丟了啊,如果跟黃蜂交易的話。如果能用B. Jackson
02/21 10:58, 9F

02/21 10:59, , 10F
的到期合約去弄個阿泰或者是MM之類的話,到還是可以接受Wells
02/21 10:59, 10F

02/21 10:59, , 11F
離開對於火箭戰力的影響
02/21 10:59, 11F

02/21 11:10, , 12F
那再把國王弄進來搞個三方交易阿...
02/21 11:10, 12F

02/21 11:12, , 13F
除非這個交易結束後能夠弄進來一個能取代Wells的球員,不然
02/21 11:12, 13F

02/21 11:13, , 14F
這個交易真太爛了,只是為了降低薪資而已,失去Wells對於
02/21 11:13, 14F

02/21 11:14, , 15F
球隊很傷
02/21 11:14, 15F

02/21 11:14, , 16F
能來artest或m.miller才行 不然棒子不能走
02/21 11:14, 16F

02/21 11:18, , 17F
國王版有消息 阿太應該不會走了
02/21 11:18, 17F

02/21 11:18, , 18F
棒子可以切入,防守也有一定水準,BJ近來偏重跳投,防守..
02/21 11:18, 18F

02/21 11:21, , 19F
黃蜂之前不是很想要師乃...現在幹麻要幫機 = =
02/21 11:21, 19F

02/21 11:21, , 20F
Clutchcity上有人說火箭考慮用Head+XX去換MM,這樣的話對照
02/21 11:21, 20F

02/21 11:22, , 21F
這個交易就合理多了,但是在連勝時期搞這種飛機.....
02/21 11:22, 21F

02/21 11:23, , 22F
對了,如果這個所謂的添頭是Ely或者是H. Armstrong,大家可以
02/21 11:23, 22F

02/21 11:24, , 23F
接受嗎?
02/21 11:24, 23F

02/21 11:23, , 24F
他們要換血 小頭+師乃? 應該不會想要MJ...
02/21 11:23, 24F

02/21 11:25, , 25F
MJ不是到黃蜂了嗎?所以不會去灰熊
02/21 11:25, 25F

02/21 11:27, , 26F
當初國王就是指名要brook 才讓artest交易告吹的
02/21 11:27, 26F

02/21 11:31, , 27F
我懂了 所以交易幫機是為了MM留位置? 那要是失敗不就慘
02/21 11:31, 27F

02/21 11:36, , 28F
所以我猜Morey正在喬,如果MM成的話就交易JacksonZ,反之就不
02/21 11:36, 28F

02/21 11:37, , 29F
如果交易完成之後,那麼我們有替補PG Jackson,替補C Ely或
02/21 11:37, 29F

02/21 11:38, , 30F
Armstrong,MM來代替Wells離開後的位置,其實還不錯耶
02/21 11:38, 30F

02/21 11:38, , 31F
所謂的添頭應該是想要Pargo 這樣黃蜂板凳兩個指標都不見了
02/21 11:38, 31F

02/21 11:39, , 32F
如果有這麼理想就好了= ="
02/21 11:39, 32F

02/21 12:27, , 33F
聽說是MJ+Wells => Jackson+R.Butler 不太滿意
02/21 12:27, 33F

02/21 12:29, , 34F
那這樣的話Morey我求你不要換.....拜託
02/21 12:29, 34F

02/21 12:43, , 35F
WELLS我也覺得別丟比較好...*嘆*
02/21 12:43, 35F

02/21 13:03, , 36F
我反而覺得不錯 雖然棒子現在在隊中發揮到一定作用
02/21 13:03, 36F

02/21 13:04, , 37F
但眼前可以解決james未來幾年的大額合同
02/21 13:04, 37F

02/21 13:07, , 38F
和得到年輕外線投射穩定的butler且合同負擔較輕
02/21 13:07, 38F

02/21 13:09, , 39F
而且棒子合約暑假到期 棒子方面一定希望一複數年約
02/21 13:09, 39F

02/21 13:12, , 40F
如果這樣換沒有後續的交易的話,相當於放棄今年了....唉
02/21 13:12, 40F

02/21 13:12, , 41F
但因考量年齡與薪資總額屆時球隊方面必定在續約問題兩難
02/21 13:12, 41F

02/21 13:15, , 42F
Wells才31歲,給他一個三年或四年約勉強可以接受,但是BJ
02/21 13:15, 42F

02/21 13:16, , 43F
已經35了,而且打的還是PG位置,他能撐多久?
02/21 13:16, 43F

02/21 13:16, , 44F
如果沒有後續的交易,拆散目前運作良好的rotation是不智行為
02/21 13:16, 44F

02/21 13:15, , 45F
不上不下也是我們尷尬的地方 陣容調整顯得左右為難
02/21 13:15, 45F

02/21 13:19, , 46F
可是現在九連勝就是擺在眼前,除非下定決心重建,不然我看不
02/21 13:19, 46F

02/21 13:20, , 47F
出為啥我們要拆掉目前看來不錯的陣容?
02/21 13:20, 47F

02/21 13:21, , 48F
如果真的要重建,丟T-Mac出去應該更好
02/21 13:21, 48F

02/21 13:20, , 49F
jackson合約即將到期傷病太多我也不對其作用抱持希望
02/21 13:20, 49F

02/21 13:23, , 50F
其實即使再強的球隊非主力球員的輪換還是必要的
02/21 13:23, 50F

02/21 13:25, , 51F
而且這觀點理應不會對球隊目前成績有太大的影響
02/21 13:25, 51F

02/21 13:27, , 52F
此前題之下所謂補強或特殊因素之交易跟重建不能混為一談
02/21 13:27, 52F

02/21 13:37, , 53F
交易要成真的話我們理當得到更多球員外的補償
02/21 13:37, 53F

02/21 13:46, , 54F
如果我們拿rotation之外的人去換,that' fine. 但是送出Wells
02/21 13:46, 54F

02/21 13:47, , 55F
姚明下場之後的低位進攻者以及外圍的防守者,卻沒有拿回合理
02/21 13:47, 55F

02/21 13:48, , 56F
的戰力回饋,我很質疑火箭根本不想在playoff更進一步,只想
02/21 13:48, 56F

02/21 13:49, , 57F
綁著姚明繼續賺取商業利益而已,我非常失望
02/21 13:49, 57F

02/21 13:51, , 58F
而且比較起來當初送出swift+Gay換Battier所謂"win now"模式
02/21 13:51, 58F

02/21 13:51, , 59F
根本就是自打嘴巴
02/21 13:51, 59F

02/21 14:03, , 60F
battier確實是相當優秀的球員但我在當時就對這交易困惑
02/21 14:03, 60F

02/21 14:05, , 61F
不過這是當時的總管道森和老范的決定想法跟莫雷當然不同
02/21 14:05, 61F

02/21 14:23, , 62F
樓上的 這交易是當時是Morey提出的...
02/21 14:23, 62F

02/21 18:26, , 63F
幹 去你媽的亞力山大
02/21 18:26, 63F

02/21 19:30, , 64F
這個交易失不失敗 要看哪方面 但是丟棒子戰力虧很大
02/21 19:30, 64F

02/21 19:31, , 65F
不小心按到噓
02/21 19:31, 65F

02/21 21:05, , 66F
史奈就是被史考特踢出來 那會要他
02/21 21:05, 66F
文章代碼(AID): #17lDwU80 (Rockets)
文章代碼(AID): #17lDwU80 (Rockets)