[轉錄][外電] The Phoenix Suns gave up on Goran Dr …

看板Rockets (休士頓火箭)作者AaronBrooks (火箭一哥)時間15年前 (2011/02/28 00:46)推噓8(8推 0噓 1→)

留言9則, 8人參與討論串1/1

※ [本文轉錄自 PHX-Suns 看板 #1DQd5RVv ] 作者: SamMa (SamMa) 看板: PHX-Suns 標題: [外電] The Phoenix Suns gave up on Goran Dragic too soon 時間: Sun Feb 27 23:44:25 2011 原文Link:http://ppt.cc/;0Fx =============================================================================== The Phoenix Suns gave up on Goran Dragic too soon 太陽過早放棄Dragic =============================================================================== Few NBA teams struggle developing young talent more than the Phoenix Suns. Aside from Amare Stoudemire and Shawn Marion, not many players come to Phoenix as a rookie and grow into an All-Star. 很少有NBA球隊像太陽這麼不會開發新秀潛能，除了Amare跟Marion，找不到其他太陽新秀能成為All-Star的案例。 (我覺得能養得出兩隻就很厲害了耶!) It’s not that the Suns don’t find the right talent, but when they do draft that diamond in the rough, they sell him off before he comes into his own as a pro. 不是因為太陽不會選秀，而是當太陽挖到原鑽，總是未磨就賣掉。 Goran Dragic is Phoenix’s latest botched project. Dragic就是個被糟蹋的例子。 There’s no question Dragic was regressing in his third season after exploding in last year’s playoffs. Dragic自去年爆炸性季後賽後，這季退步不少。 But this is a guy that fans were comfortable labeling as the heir to Nash’s throne. And rightfully so. 不過這小子被球迷封為Nash接班人，可不是叫假的。 After battling confidence demons early on, Dragic showed the skill-set to run the Suns’ offense effectively, while showcasing the playmaking ability that made him a fan favorite. Dragic打出自信後，展現出十分好的進攻能力與組織能力，深受太陽球迷喜愛。 Between his 23-point fourth quarter in Game 3 against the Spurs and his Slovenian showdown with Sasha Vujacic in the Western Conference Finals, Dragic answered all of the questions about his ability to take over when Nash calls it quits. 去年的季後賽，Dragic展現出大將之風，一副待Nash退休就可以接管太陽的樣子。 But after 48 regular season games — he also missed seven with a foot laceration — Lon Babby and Lance Blanks decided he wasn’t “point guard of the future” material? 不過僅短短48場季賽後，Lon Babby與Lance Blanks就宣布"Dragic不適任太陽的未來控衛" Sure he lacked consistency, turned the ball over too often and struggled getting the Suns into their offense at times, but those 48 games were enough to make the front office forget about his playoff heroics? Enough to disregard how far he’d come since arriving in Phoenix as a timid, scrawny 22-year-old kid? 沒錯Dragic是台雲霄飛車，時常失誤、送分，不過短短48場比賽，就足以讓人忘了他去年季後賽的英姿嗎? For a team lacking a young nucleus to build around, trading one of its cornerstones was undoubtedly a step in the wrong direction. He’s still 24 years old and it clearly wasn’t time to give up on him — especially for a slightly better player with nowhere near the ceiling. 一個老人球隊，居然還把隊中年輕基石賣出去，這絕對是錯的，特別是只換來一個稍微好一點的球員 (我覺得24跟26歲沒有差很多阿，而且控衛職業壽命通常都比較長。) And it’s not like Dragic’s skills diminished this season. In one of his two starts on the year he went for 17 and 10 against the Bobcats. In the four games that he played 30 minutes or more this season, Dragic averaged 14.8 points and 7.5 assists, which aren’t bad numbers for your point guard of the future in his third year. Dragic這季也不是真的爛透了，一些能上場比較久的比賽中，其實他打得不錯。 He simply struggled with consistency, which is clearly a problem that comes with lack of experience and usually works itself out with age. Babby and Blanks explained that they dealt Dragic for Brooks so that they could make a late-season push toward the playoffs. But a backup point guard isn’t the difference in making the playoffs or not, especially for a team lacking interior scoring. Dragic單純只很不穩，相信打久了就會改善， Babby與Blanks解釋，這筆交易是為了強化太陽，以期本季能打入季後賽，不過買一個替補控衛，似乎跟太陽能不能進季後賽沒多大的關係，畢竟太陽缺乏的是內部得分能力。 (似乎很有道理！射手我們不少了，禁區除了Gortat沒人會得分，這比較是罩門，Warrick防守太爛不敢放他上太久。) The Suns simply gave up on another young before he had a chance to hit his prime, while handing over a draft pick to boot. But this isn’t the first time Phoenix has done this. 太陽單純是在新秀成熟前把他賣了，還奉送一個第一輪選秀權，這不是太陽第一次這樣做了。 Everyone remembers handing out guys like Rajon Rondo and Luol Deng. And most recently, the Suns gave up on Earl Clark and his massive potential. He clearly wasn’t cutting it in Phoenix, but when the Suns drafted him they knew he was going to be a long-term project, but for whatever reason they couldn’t wait. 大家都記得當年，太陽送走過Rajon Rondo跟Luol Deng， (這兩筆不太算吧，選前就說好要賣了) 不久前太陽才賤賣了Earl Clark，太陽選Clark時就知道培養他需要時間然後不知道有什麼理由，太陽突然不想等了。 After Phoenix shipped Clark off to Orlando, I wanted to write a post about how the Suns gave up on the multi-talented big man a little too soon, but I never did. Clark’s currently writing that story for me with his play, as he’ s a regular rotation player with the Magic, showing flashes of what he could have been in Phoenix. 然後你看看，Clark現在在魔術正常輪替中活得十分愉快。 He’s playing just over 12 minutes a game while averaging 4.9 points per contest, and Stan Van Gundy recently said that Clark has “unlimited” potential defensively. The Suns had — and always have had — the young pieces to build a team around, they just lack the patience to do so. Clark在魔術每場平均打12分鐘，平均拿4.9分，魔術教練對他讚不絕口。 Sarver seemingly thinks the Suns are his fantasy team, and trades like it’s the stock market. Only five players — Steve Nash, Grant Hill, Channing Frye, Robin Lopez and Jared Dudley — remain from the Suns’ 2009-10 Western Conference Finals team. $arver像玩網頁遊戲一樣玩自己的隊伍，交易球員像交易股票一般去年我們的季後賽球員，只剩下5個還在隊上:Nash, Hill, Frye, Lopez, Dudley Some players simply had to go, but dealing the youth of your organization as you watch the face of your franchise get older and older isn’t the best way to build a team. Although Aaron Brooks could go off for the occasional 20 points, the Suns once again shot themselves in the foot, bailing on a young prospect before he has his chance to shine. 雖然不管那一隊，球員都是來來去去，不過讓隊伍越變越老可不是件好事。的確小AB有時可以自幹個二十幾分給你看，不過太陽又一次失去自己養新人的機會。 (明年如果封館，$arver就慘了，老人們可能會退休，太陽小市場、資金少，搶Free Agent也搶不過其他隊) =============================================================================== 來看看外國鄉民怎麼說: 換到小AB有賺賣Dragic賠大了沒賺沒賠觀察個幾年再說 ESPN 32% 28% 18% 22% Azcentral(鳳凰城地方報) 39.43% 39.09% 21.48% 外國鄉民看來也是反應兩極化 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.167.128.41

推

akiyo791

02/27 23:46,

02/27 23:46

→

asimple

02/27 23:47,

02/27 23:47

→

SamMa

02/27 23:47,

02/27 23:47