Fw: [外絮] 林受傷後,火箭如何因應

看板Rockets (休士頓 火箭)作者 (BasketBall Thug)時間12年前 (2013/04/26 15:28), 編輯推噓7(7034)
留言41則, 10人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 Jeremy_Lin 看板 #1HUUzyyL ] 作者: peter16 (YOYO) 看板: Jeremy_Lin 標題: [外絮] 林受傷後,火箭如何因應 時間: Fri Apr 26 11:07:37 2013 因為閒聊區有一段關於接下來小貝的使用 (感謝N大提供資訊) 不過對岸翻譯的"重用、圍繞小貝"似乎有點驚悚 而且可能會害冰箱遭受攻擊(?) 我把原文找到了並且稍微翻譯了一下,給大家參考 :) 原文出處: http://ppt.cc/uLr_ Rockets rookie Beverley undaunted by playoff atmosphere 火箭新秀小貝無畏季後賽壓力 前文恕刪 僅節錄與啾咪有關部分如下 Expanded role (小貝)的角色變化 The Rockets were generally optimistic that Lin will be able to play, having seen him battle through a variety of injuries throughout the season without missing a game. They can feel better about replacing him with Beverley coming off his best game of the season, but they do not want to have to ask him to do more. 曾見證過啾咪林這一整個球季下來多次與傷痛對抗,但仍未缺席過一場比賽 所以火箭對林的回歸,保持樂觀態度 但經過上一場小貝打出生涯最佳的比賽後,火箭應該可以放心讓他取代啾咪林的位置 不過他們應該不會要求小貝去做更多的事 “Jeremy’s a tough kid,” Rockets coach Kevin McHale said. “For him not to play in a big game like that it had to really bother him quite a bit. We’re going to have to make do. Patrick is a heck of a little competitor. He’s going to go out and do his thing. We’ll just have to fill around him.” "啾咪是個堅強的孩子" 火箭教頭冰箱如此說道 "對他來說,缺席這樣的大比賽,一定很難熬" "但我們必須想點辦法,小貝有強烈的競爭心,他會跳出來並且做他該做的 我們只需要從旁填補他不足的地方" Added forward Chandler Parsons: “I don’t see Jeremy not playing. He’s a tough kid.” Lin had seven points with four rebounds and three assists in his 20 minutes, struggling through the end of the second quarter after a collision with Thabo Sefolosha that eventually knocked him out of the game. 高富帥表示"我還沒看過啾咪林本季缺席比賽,他是個堅強的孩子" 林上一場比賽出賽20分鐘,得到7分4籃板3助攻 但在第二節末段與沙發樓下的衝撞,導致他缺席了剩下的比賽 成也沙發、敗也沙發(大誤) Some of the advantage of moving Beverley into the starting lineup in place of power forward Greg Smith would be lost if Beverley had to handle the point without Lin. The Rockets were able to get the ball movement they lacked in Game 1 in part with Beverley adding spacing while Lin and James Harden handled the ball. The Rockets did not shoot well, making 39.6 percent, but were getting the open looks, especially from the 3-point arc, they could not in Game 1. 但,上一場出奇兵將小貝移至先發陣容取代GS的優勢, 可能會因為之後他必須負擔起啾咪林的控球工作而失去 上一場在小貝加入後,的確創造出了一些空間 進而讓林和鬍子在處理球這部分,也比第一場有了更多流動性 雖然火箭命中率還是不理想,但至少在弧頂有了更多空檔 “You get what we talked about after the first game,” McHale said of the revised lineup. “We didn’t get near enough movement (in Game 1). If they stay big, (the small lineup) drags one of those bigs out of there so there is more room to penetrate and get to the rim. With Jeremy out there, it gives you another ballhandler to penetrate and break the defense down.” 冰箱對於調整陣容的說法是"第一戰結束後我們就說過了,我們那一場沒能充分的傳導球 如果他們維持大個子陣容,我們的四小戰術將至少可以吸引一名大個子出禁區 就會給我們更多空間切入攻擊籃框" "如果啾咪在場上,就能製造出另一個持球者切入並且破壞防守的機會" -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.228.56.29 ※ 編輯: KenRock 來自: 211.20.239.247 (04/26 15:28)

04/26 17:10, , 1F
冰箱終於承認Lin的破壞性是不可或缺的了
04/26 17:10, 1F

04/26 18:01, , 2F
冰箱終於學會說場面話了
04/26 18:01, 2F

04/26 23:39, , 3F
我是怕,火箭以後的大前鋒都上不了場...=.=
04/26 23:39, 3F

04/26 23:39, , 4F
四小似乎要變成火箭的獨門招牌.
04/26 23:39, 4F

04/26 23:39, , 5F
這其實還滿有噱頭的..XD
04/26 23:39, 5F

04/26 23:42, , 6F
戰術也是看手上有甚麼料去設計的
04/26 23:42, 6F

04/26 23:42, , 7F
不用擔心這個
04/26 23:42, 7F

04/26 23:42, , 8F
其實半刻意的,之前莫雷瘋狂的補後衛就是在佈局
04/26 23:42, 8F

04/26 23:42, , 9F
他也講是他的意思.
04/26 23:42, 9F

04/26 23:44, , 10F
布局甚麼?
04/26 23:44, 10F

04/26 23:45, , 11F
就是四小阿..他有表示他想要火箭打四小.
04/26 23:45, 11F

04/26 23:46, , 12F
不過要一個名人堂大前鋒教練帶四小陣容,還滿鮮的...XD
04/26 23:46, 12F

04/26 23:49, , 13F
我不覺得這是故意布局出來的...應該只是看手上的料去安排
04/26 23:49, 13F

04/26 23:49, , 14F
他不可能預期Beverly一定打得出來 D-mo T-rob一定不行
04/26 23:49, 14F

04/26 23:50, , 15F
我也覺得倒果為因了,莫雷只是觀察到火箭打四小時的效率
04/26 23:50, 15F

04/26 23:51, , 16F
不錯,所以希望教練多安排一點時間而已
04/26 23:51, 16F

04/26 23:52, , 17F
事實上隊伍也花了不少時間 去找PF先發跟替補的答案
04/26 23:52, 17F

04/26 23:53, , 18F
真要講起來 就是在這些嘗試的過程中 發現四小可以打
04/26 23:53, 18F

04/27 00:07, , 19F
四小只是臨時應變的...+1
04/27 00:07, 19F

04/27 00:30, , 20F
我最近才發現MO應該可以算是火箭隊的傳統,而四小以前也用
04/27 00:30, 20F

04/27 00:31, , 21F
而我還是對Lin的表現有問號
04/27 00:31, 21F

04/27 00:31, , 22F
到底為何在自由極高的MO裡,找不到定位?
04/27 00:31, 22F

04/27 00:32, , 23F
Handoff真的是他的缺點?
04/27 00:32, 23F

04/27 00:33, , 24F
球權先放一邊,但沒球權就沒那麼出色
04/27 00:33, 24F

04/27 00:33, , 25F
到底是能力還是心理問題?
04/27 00:33, 25F

04/27 00:33, , 26F
有高高手解答嘛?
04/27 00:33, 26F

04/27 00:34, , 27F
PS:純粹疑惑,非表示他不好,千萬別誤解。
04/27 00:34, 27F

04/27 00:43, , 28F
因為太自由了..現在沒有setplay 沒有辦法像以前那樣打
04/27 00:43, 28F

04/27 00:45, , 29F
另外就是看起來很自由的MO 實際上被搞成只有高位擋拆
04/27 00:45, 29F

04/27 00:46, , 30F
基本來說 我覺得本季的火箭戰術訓練一整個悲劇...
04/27 00:46, 30F

04/27 01:11, , 31F
聽你講完怎覺有點像亂打XD...
04/27 01:11, 31F

04/27 01:12, , 32F
是整體球員戰術觀念教育問題呢,還是球員本生問題呢 無解
04/27 01:12, 32F

04/27 01:58, , 33F
不會啊 無球掩護 後掩護 開後門 都有啊
04/27 01:58, 33F

04/27 01:59, , 34F
高位擋拆是比較容易打
04/27 01:59, 34F

04/27 02:19, , 35F
太自由了,除非是有經驗或籃球天分高材好掌握吧
04/27 02:19, 35F

04/27 13:24, , 36F
個人覺得LIN的空切很多都是瞎忙,跑的時機跟自己沒有投射
04/27 13:24, 36F

04/27 13:24, , 37F
威脅性導致連拖車效果都沒有做出來
04/27 13:24, 37F

04/27 13:25, , 38F
總之LIN的無球跑動效果不好,要不要針對他或者其他人設置
04/27 13:25, 38F

04/27 13:26, , 39F
專門戰術,績效問題罷了
04/27 13:26, 39F

04/27 13:36, , 40F
恩效果不好,也有一部份跟不穩定的外線有關。
04/27 13:36, 40F

04/27 13:37, , 41F
他持球的威脅性目前還是大於非持球。
04/27 13:37, 41F
文章代碼(AID): #1HUYo3P5 (Rockets)
文章代碼(AID): #1HUYo3P5 (Rockets)