[外電] Q&A With Kelvin Sampson - Defense(上)

看板Rockets (休士頓 火箭)作者 (He'll Be Back #7)時間12年前 (2013/11/21 16:28), 編輯推噓139(1390287)
留言426則, 39人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Q&A With Kelvin Sampson Rockets assistant coach dishes on defensive leap team hopes to make in 2013-14 Jason Friedman Rockets.com 2013/09//17 官網原文: http://www.nba.com/rockets/news/qa-kelvin-sampson-1 參考翻譯: http://wap.hupu.com/bbs/6420292.html ***************************************************************************** 專訪Kelvin Sampson 火箭隊助理教練對13-14球季,球隊防守進步的展望。 JCF: You probably won’t be surprised to know that I want to talk to you about defense. That’s obviously the place where this team can most improve upon its performance from last year. Everybody knows this club will be able to put points on the board, but what needs to happen for it to take the next step toward becoming a championship-caliber defensive unit? JCF:你可能不會對我想討論防守這件事情感到驚訝吧, 從去年的表現而言,球隊的防守明顯地是有很大的進步空間。 每個人都知道我們有強大的進攻火力, 但要如何更進一步地成為冠軍級別的防守組織呢? KS: Last year I thought we were really good at one thing and that was keeping the ball out of the paint. We were, I think, No. 3 in the league in the way we quantify that. I think the area for improvement this year is defending the 3-point line – we gave up way too many corner 3s last year. A lot of that was because of what we were trying to take away. You’re always going to give up something. In the NBA, defensively, no matter what coverage you’re in or what schemes you’re trying to run, you’ve got to decide what you’re willing to give up. Last year we were willing to give up slot 3s as long as they were contested. Where we got hurt last year was the extra pass to the corner – a lot of times our corner guy got caught in a stunt. KS:去年,有件事情我們做的很好:不讓球進入油漆區,我想有資格排聯盟第三。 今年我們需要在防守三分上有所提高--去年我們給了對手太多底腳三分的機會。 很多是因為我們想放棄,你總是得放棄點什麼。 在NBA聯盟中,防守上無論是怎樣的防守範圍或者用什麼樣的防守體系, 你總要做出決定你們願意放棄什麼。 去年,只要能對敵人做出干擾,我們情願放棄防守三分空檔。 而敵人那些多出來的傳球到底線的三分空檔,對我們造成傷害--- 很多時候我們的底角防守者只能望球興嘆。 I thought our fourth quarter defense, especially the last six minutes of the game, was good overall – that’s one of the reasons we won so many games was because we would guard in the fourth quarter. I think some of that (not defending for the full 48 minutes) is because of maturity. Some of our guys had the mindset that if they had one foul, they didn’t want to pick up their second – if they got called for fouls early in the game, they didn’t want to take any chances picking up their third foul. That’s a maturity issue. 我想我們第四節的防守,尤其是比賽最後的六分鐘,總體來說是不錯地(?!)。 ---這也是贏下了這麼多比賽的原因之一。 我想我們無法維持48分鐘的防守強度,有部分原因是成熟度還不夠。 有些球員的思考邏輯是,當吃了一次犯規後就不想吃第二個, ---當比賽中過早犯規時,他們會避免任何第三次犯規的可能。 這就是一個成熟度問題。 The other issue comes down to wanting to become better individual defenders; keeping your man in front of you. We’re going to make some significant changes this year in our pick-and-roll coverages, but I think having a rim protector like Dwight Howard allows us to get out on the floor, pressure more, extend our defense -- our pick-up point can be higher -- we can get out and challenge passes from the wing, we can get in the passing lanes and be more aggressive, and I think that will help us. 另一個問題是,自己是否想成為更好的單防球員,一直保持在你的對位者前方。 本季我們在擋拆的防守策略會有重大變動,因為有了DH這個籃筐守護神, 可以讓我們可以衝出去、採取更多壓迫、延伸我們的防守---我們可以在更高位延阻--- 我們可以撲向來自側翼的傳球來製造麻煩,我們可以阻隔傳球路線並更有侵略性, 我相信這能幫到我們。(編按:NO COMMENT) Patrick Beverley evolved into a really good defender at the point of attack last year. I think Jeremy Lin was a guy who was a better defender than people gave him credit for – Jeremy is a really good help defender, especially on the weak side because he’s so good at anticipating passes and getting in the lane and digging and coming up with loose balls. We feel good with Jeremy and Pat at the point of attack, turning them loose more to be more aggressive. 以去年而言,從給予侵略性的角度上來說,PB真的是一位很好的防守者。 我想LIN是比人們想像中的更好的防守者---他的協防真好, 尤其是弱側,來自於他良好的傳球預判以及介入傳球路徑造成對方丟球。 我們(教練組)對於LIN+PB的防守攻擊性感到滿意, 製造對手更多的丟球是更有侵略性的防守。(編按:協防過深是否是一場美麗的誤會?!) We might funnel the ball more to Dwight, rather than funneling the ball away from the basket with him being such a great rim protector. But we really want to improve upon our field goal percentage defense and generating loose balls, deflections and steals. Those are some of the main areas we really want to get better at. I think with Dwight protecting the basket we’ll have more blocked shots which is going to create more loose balls. When he blocks a shot, we’ve got to go get it and we’ve got to turn that into offense the other way. 我們可能會刻意“漏”持球人給禁區的DH來防守, 而不是在有籃筐保護神的時候,把持球人趕離籃筐周圍。 但我們真得要降低對方的投籃命中率,逼迫對手丟球、干擾進攻路線並獲得抄截。 我想有DH保護籃下,我們能夠蓋更多火鍋並造成對手更多失球。 有了火鍋,我們得以掌握球權,並轉化為進攻。 (編按:對也不對。而且最會蓋火鍋給自己人的也不是DH。) We’ve talked as a coaching staff a lot about our coverages. I don’t really want to get too deep into that because we haven’t had this team together yet but I’m excited about the things we’re doing and we’re all excited about having a chance to be a much better defensive team this year. 從教練的角度,我們談了很多防守範圍的事, 我並不想說得太多,畢竟我們還沒開始一起訓練。 但我們對於我們正在做的事感到興奮, 我們對於有機會成為一支更好的防守球隊也感到興奮。 (編按:http://0rz.tw/CiLOM ) JCF: I know you’re limited in how much you can say about the different pick-and-roll coverages you intend to employ, but I did find it interesting to hear you talk about funneling the ball toward Dwight on the defensive end since I know how much you emphasized keeping the ball out of the paint last year. It makes sense of course, and also should theoretically help the perimeter players stay closer to home to cut down on some of those wide-open 3s that were conceded a year ago. JCF:我知道關於使用怎樣的擋拆防守策略您能透露的有限, 但你談到刻意“漏”持球者給DH這點很有趣, 因為我知道上賽季我們強調別讓持球人進油漆區。 當然這很有道理,而且從理論上也能幫助外線球員防守到位, 減少一年前空檔三分的丟分。 KS: Right. But you know defense still comes down to guarding your man. San Antonio puts so much pressure on your defense with the way they execute their pick-and-roll game and the way they spread their shooters but, no matter what they get to in their offense, stopping them still comes down to the point of attack and being able to handle their pick-and-roll with two people instead of three people. If we can keep guys at home more and be able to handle pick-and-roll action without bringing a third guy, that would be big for us. KS:沒錯,但防守歸根到底還是要防住你的對位者。 比如說,馬刺的擋拆配合和射手群的佈置方式, 會給予你防守上很大的壓力。 但無論他們使用什麼方式進攻,要阻止他們還是要靠防守的侵略性, 並且使用兩個人而不是三個人應付他們的擋拆。 如果我們能讓小伙子們更多的處在原先的防守位置, 而不用使用第三個人就能應付擋拆, 那我們會很了不起。 Dwight gives us an eraser. He corrects mistakes. I know a lot of times when we played the Lakers, especially in the fourth quarter, it’s hard to get in the paint and score over him because if he didn’t block the shot, he sure altered it. So allowing him to roam, being able to rebound behind him, and being able to defend the 3-point line, we’re excited about that. I’m excited for practice to start to see how this is going to come together. DH能替我們擦屁股,糾正我們的錯誤。 我知道,之前當我們在面對湖人的時候,尤其第四節,在油漆區裡很難在他頭上得分, 因為即便他沒有封蓋到出手,也能讓對手出手變樣了。 所以讓魔獸漫步吧,我們必須搶好他身後的籃板,防堵好三分,這些讓我們興奮。 我等不及訓練的時候看看這些湊到一起效果如何。 ***************************************************************************** 臨時要去客戶那邊,晚點或者明天或者有其他版友接力翻譯吧。 掰掰。 -- A leader is someone that knows how to get his people to behind him and support him, not someone who thinks he is superior than the peoplearound him. http://0rz.tw/uevjp -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 211.20.239.247

11/21 16:33, , 1F
推好心
11/21 16:33, 1F

11/21 16:35, , 2F
哈登每場都待場上很久,確沒提到他的防守
11/21 16:35, 2F

11/21 16:36, , 3F
也沒有講到曾經是小鎖的CP
11/21 16:36, 3F

11/21 16:43, , 4F
CP防守被Kobe誇過後就...沒下文了...
11/21 16:43, 4F

11/21 16:49, , 5F
他那場守KOBE守的真的不錯
11/21 16:49, 5F

11/21 16:53, , 6F
說第四節守得好沒錯啊 因為去年是第三節常態性撈賽
11/21 16:53, 6F

11/21 18:18, , 7F
說Lin協防過深的人.....臉好腫
11/21 18:18, 7F

11/21 18:50, , 8F
腫在哪?看比賽他是協防過深 本篇稱讚他的協防起了作用
11/21 18:50, 8F

11/21 18:50, , 9F
這兩個又不衝突
11/21 18:50, 9F

11/21 18:56, , 10F
沒有喔 協防過深可以是種誤解
11/21 18:56, 10F

11/21 18:56, , 11F
因為漏人沒有關係 交給內線的DH處理 但是外線要協防
11/21 18:56, 11F

11/21 18:56, , 12F
這應該是KS的說法
11/21 18:56, 12F

11/21 18:59, , 13F
火箭防守這麼弱..這位Sampson就是防守教練..唉唉..
11/21 18:59, 13F

11/21 19:04, , 14F
所以林的協防漏人是可以被允許的?
11/21 19:04, 14F

11/21 19:06, , 15F
sampson不就是去年冰箱不在時的代理教練嗎?
11/21 19:06, 15F

11/21 19:17, , 16F
不要說三守二了 我看林防守擋拆時常常一守二 = =
11/21 19:17, 16F

11/21 19:21, , 17F
我看比賽時是覺得樓上說的那句刪掉"林"還是通用
11/21 19:21, 17F

11/21 19:21, , 18F
防守時 對方檔拆 常常是一守二,感覺是整隊的問題
11/21 19:21, 18F

11/21 19:22, , 19F
樓上說的沒錯 我只是順口提到林
11/21 19:22, 19F

11/21 19:23, , 20F
只有TJ好像比較常一起守,但是TJ防檔拆的經驗也是還可進步
11/21 19:23, 20F

11/21 19:24, , 21F
整隊的防守看起來真得很慘,是整個系統的問題+JH
11/21 19:24, 21F

11/21 19:24, , 22F
8W5L 講白點像是單純靠球員天賦打球沒整合過
11/21 19:24, 22F

11/21 19:27, , 23F
其實不懂可以發文問啊,協防過深?有人撲去協防的同時,
11/21 19:27, 23F

11/21 19:29, , 24F
就會有輪轉出現,第三個人第四個就要補上去,這樣一直交
11/21 19:29, 24F

11/21 19:31, , 25F
換防守的對象,包夾、補位、歸位
11/21 19:31, 25F

11/21 19:34, , 26F
協防是遵照教練指示 漏人是教練下戰術的產生問題喔
11/21 19:34, 26F

11/21 19:35, , 27F
籃球團隊防守不就是這樣
11/21 19:35, 27F

11/21 19:35, , 28F
所以如果去協防卻漏了原先的人 責任在於要補位的那個?
11/21 19:35, 28F

11/21 19:36, , 29F
責任就在教練了 如果沒照教練指示而漏人才是球員的問題喔
11/21 19:36, 29F

11/21 19:37, , 30F
是說防守問題已經很久了,不考慮調整教練團嗎?
11/21 19:37, 30F

11/21 19:37, , 31F
了解~~
11/21 19:37, 31F

11/21 19:38, , 32F
所以如果有人沒有照教練指示去做補位 就是其他球員的問題
11/21 19:38, 32F

11/21 19:38, , 33F
火箭的防守策略跟其他隊伍比起來沒有顯得比較特別
11/21 19:38, 33F

11/21 19:39, , 34F
你換100個教練都一樣,重點還是球員自己肯不肯在防守上下
11/21 19:39, 34F

11/21 19:39, , 35F
功夫
11/21 19:39, 35F

11/21 19:40, , 36F
心態問題 就這樣
11/21 19:40, 36F

11/21 19:41, , 37F
協防漏人哪可能被允許,這是要拿捏傷害程度的
11/21 19:41, 37F

11/21 19:42, , 38F
所以問題應該就在球員的防守心態上了..........?
11/21 19:42, 38F

11/21 19:44, , 39F
只要有一個人心不在焉,他一漏位整個外線陪他輪轉一次
11/21 19:44, 39F
還有 348 則推文
11/22 12:00, , 388F
可能開季樣本數不夠 他防守很扎實倒是沒問題
11/22 12:00, 388F

11/22 12:00, , 389F
pb切入還蠻快的
11/22 12:00, 389F

11/22 12:40, , 390F
切入很快沒錯啦 但是突破力不夠
11/22 12:40, 390F

11/22 13:05, , 391F
有鎖也沒用,冰箱不會用,之前brewer沒受傷也很少上場
11/22 13:05, 391F

11/22 13:41, , 392F
PB切入快 但是切不過人阿 每次都切心酸的....
11/22 13:41, 392F

11/22 14:28, , 393F
切得很快~但是沒切到食材...
11/22 14:28, 393F

11/22 14:38, , 394F
火箭之前的3連勝都是勝率不到5成的NGT..所以.考驗在後面.
11/22 14:38, 394F

11/22 14:41, , 395F
怎麼覺得IBIZA有前後矛盾? 1雙塔問題在外圍防守 2又說團隊
11/22 14:41, 395F

11/22 14:42, , 396F
防守鞏固禁區 放掉外線是成功的?
11/22 14:42, 396F

11/22 14:45, , 397F
雙塔+Lin eFGA .384 雙塔+PB eFGA .458 都比團隊 .469低
11/22 14:45, 397F

11/22 14:47, , 398F
如果團隊防守策略成功 那雙塔造成對手eFG更低 防守也成攻
11/22 14:47, 398F

11/22 14:47, , 399F
成功
11/22 14:47, 399F

11/22 14:50, , 400F
以DH跟Asik能力, 一個人固守禁區就行了, 兩個人只是浪費人力
11/22 14:50, 400F

11/22 14:50, , 401F
很難懂嗎?
11/22 14:50, 401F

11/22 14:50, , 402F
雙塔的Defense eFGA% .384哪邊查得到?
11/22 14:50, 402F

11/22 14:52, , 403F
你是查Top Five-Man Floor Units? 可是那不是完整數據
11/22 14:52, 403F

11/22 14:58, , 404F
另外, eFG%只是4 facts之一而已, 並不是全部...雙塔鞏固禁區
11/22 14:58, 404F

11/22 14:58, , 405F
也許更強, 但是在每回合失分方面, 你講的這兩個組合分別是
11/22 14:58, 405F

11/22 14:59, , 406F
1.04跟1.10, 這說明雙塔即使壓低了eFG%, 但很可能在其他三個
11/22 14:59, 406F

11/22 14:59, , 407F
facts上產生更大問題...
11/22 14:59, 407F

11/22 15:07, , 408F
→ IBIZA:火箭防守上作不好的並不是在防守投射上
11/22 15:07, 408F

11/22 15:07, , 409F
這也是為什麼我剛剛說 現在火箭的防守問題不是在投射上
11/22 15:07, 409F

11/22 15:08, , 410F
火箭的防守 在壓低投射期望制(eFG%)上是成功的
11/22 15:08, 410F

11/22 15:08, , 411F
目前火箭在四個防守facts上 最差的是造成對方失誤上
11/22 15:08, 411F

11/22 15:09, , 412F
目前是全聯盟最後一名
11/22 15:09, 412F

11/22 15:47, , 413F
沒錯是從 Top Five-Man Floor Units查的 他也有4facts只是
11/22 15:47, 413F

11/22 15:50, , 414F
數據表達不同 從你對雙塔結論問題在防守 再討論到團隊防守
11/22 15:50, 414F

11/22 15:51, , 415F
團隊防守成功的部分 雙塔也一樣 團隊失敗的部分雙塔也相同
11/22 15:51, 415F

11/22 15:53, , 416F
進攻失誤過多 無法造成對手失誤 防守籃板鞏固問題 都存在
11/22 15:53, 416F

11/22 15:54, , 417F
失分1.04跟1.10 跟現在團隊DRtg106.4 也互有高低
11/22 15:54, 417F

11/22 15:56, , 418F
覺得雙塔陣容差最多是 進攻得分 0.89 0.84對比ORtg110.2
11/22 15:56, 418F

11/22 16:34, , 419F
雙塔應該是防守沒想像中好,然後進攻跟想像中一樣爛吧
11/22 16:34, 419F

11/22 16:47, , 420F
雙塔是極端了點,eFG%能壓那麼低也是對方根本打不進禁區
11/22 16:47, 420F

11/22 16:47, , 421F
進而尋求外線投射,外線投射自然命中率不會高,但是差別在
11/22 16:47, 421F

11/22 16:48, , 422F
雙塔那幾場我們三分也烙賽命中率也不過2X%,對方只要有
11/22 16:48, 422F

11/22 16:49, , 423F
34%命中率就足夠把火箭射爆了,加上雙塔空間小,火箭即使
11/22 16:49, 423F

11/22 16:50, , 424F
往內打往內切效率也太差,比來比去就是雙塔壓制的eFG%
11/22 16:50, 424F

11/22 16:51, , 425F
根本無法抵銷進攻上的得分荒
11/22 16:51, 425F

11/23 08:51, , 426F
感謝同意~
11/23 08:51, 426F
iswearxxx:轉錄至看板 Jeremy_Lin 11/23 08:52
文章代碼(AID): #1IZSGrxd (Rockets)
文章代碼(AID): #1IZSGrxd (Rockets)