[情報] Draft grades: Evaluating every team, from A+ to D

看板Spurs (聖安東尼奧馬刺)作者dragonfly9 (短髮英薩吉)時間17年前 (2008/06/28 18:19)推噓11(11推 0噓 3→)

留言14則, 9人參與討論串1/1

ESPN Chad Ford針對各隊今年的選秀做的短評只節錄馬刺的部份翻譯原文網址：http://tinyurl.com/52gorz San Antonio Spurs Grade: C Round 1: George Hill (26) Round 2: Malik Hairston (48), James Gist (57) Analysis: The Spurs are one of the best-drafting teams in the league, so I'm wary of criticizing them. But sometimes a team can be too clever for its own good. Hill is a nice player, but I don't believe he's a better point guard than Mario Chalmers. 評析：馬刺是聯盟中最會選秀的球隊之一，所以我很謹慎地分析他們的選人。但是球隊為了自身的利益考量，有時反而顯得聰明過頭。Hill是個好球員，但我不認為他是個比Mario Chalmers好的控球後衛。 Hairston is a nice pick at No. 48. He's solid at just about everything; he could make the team as a defender and spot-up shooter. Gist is a great athlete , but I'm not sure he's got what it takes to stick. Hairston在第48順位是個聰明的選擇。他幾乎各方面的基本功都不錯；他能替球帶來防守和定點投射的能力。Gist運動能力極佳，但我不確定他是否具備所需付出的條件，以求在聯盟中生存下去。大家參考看看吧！話說被評為A+的只有一隊剛好就是之後選到Mario Chalmers的熱火不過可能是因為他們有了Beasley來搭配Wade Anyway，會來最重要！XD 接下來就看新秀們夏季聯盟的表現吧！ -- My Life, My Fight http://www.wretch.cc/blog/dragonfly9 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.114.30.189

推

jealousguy

06/28 20:57, , 1^F

06/28 20:57, 1^F

推

kurtc

06/28 21:10, , 2^F

06/28 21:10, 2^F

推

magicchen

06/28 21:18, , 3^F

06/28 21:18, 3^F