R.J news

看板Spurs (聖安東尼奧 馬刺)作者 (☆ Fundamental)時間16年前 (2010/07/02 08:45), 編輯推噓7(7019)
留言26則, 10人參與, 7年前最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板 #1CBJP_RV ] 作者: spurs2120 (☆ Fundamental) 看板: NBA 標題: Re: [外絮] R.Jefferson:我想回紐約 時間: Fri Jul 2 08:44:44 2010 http://RJreturns.notlong.com 比起上面那篇猜想,這裡的消息應該可靠一些,至少有RJ的親友和經紀人的說法。 It might not be long before small forward Richard Jefferson is back on the Spurs' payroll. Jefferson, who opted out of the final year of his contract Wednesday, has told close associates his top priority in free agency is to secure a new multi-year deal to return to the Spurs. In a decision that stunned many NBA observers, Jefferson turned down $15.2 million to enter the free agent fray. His agent, Todd Eley, said Jefferson did so in the name of long-term security. In short, Jefferson wanted a new, longer contract before the NBA's collective bargaining agreement is revamped next summer. One unconfirmed report Thursday had Jefferson poised to sign a three-year, $30 million with the Spurs. Another had the terms at five years for $45 million, with the final season likely only partially guaranteed. Eley insisted Thursday his client does not yet have a deal in place with any team. With so much money floating around the free-agent market, among teams gearing up for the LeBron James/Dwyane Wade/Chris Bosh sweepstakes, Jefferson is likely to wait until some of that smoke clears before making a final decision. Despite a rocky first season with the Spurs, in which he averaged 12.3 points after coming over in a preseason trade with Milwaukee, there are signs Jefferson would welcome a return to San Antonio. He has spent much of his summer in the Spurs' practice gym, working out personally with head coach Gregg Popovich. Before the season ended, Jefferson spoke often about looking forward to a second season in San Antonio, when he might feel more comfortable with the system. The Spurs, too, would be open to bringing Jefferson back under a more cap-friendly contract. With their payroll still projected to be over the salary cap, they would be hard-pressed to find his replacement on the open market. 雖然我對RJ回來是抱著正面肯定的態度啦,不過要是真的45M/5ys,制服組也可以跳河了... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.192.223.22 ※ 編輯: spurs2120 來自: 123.192.223.22 (07/02 08:45)

07/02 08:53, , 1F
所以是馬刺自己摟...科科...
07/02 08:53, 1F

07/02 08:55, , 2F
他打法跟馬刺不合阿 留他好嗎?
07/02 08:55, 2F

07/02 08:56, , 3F
不管是30M/3ys還是45M/5ys 我都寧願放他走
07/02 08:56, 3F

07/02 08:56, , 4F
他不會是TD最後時期的SF解答
07/02 08:56, 4F

07/02 09:01, , 5F
3年30M倒還可以 先前說的4年30M對RJ來說應該不會願意接受
07/02 09:01, 5F

07/02 09:02, , 6F
他離開馬刺比留下帶來的傷害還大 至少今年看來 所以目標應該
07/02 09:02, 6F

07/02 09:02, , 7F
是留下 但盡量短約操作 3年應該是雙方可以接受的長度
07/02 09:02, 7F

07/02 09:03, , 8F
我不覺得RJ第二年會打得像第一年這麼糟 歷年來新加入的球員都
07/02 09:03, 8F

07/02 09:03, , 9F
是在第二年開始才熟悉然後發光發熱的
07/02 09:03, 9F

07/02 09:05, , 10F
我也不覺得他會比第一年糟(應該很難更糟吧= =a)
07/02 09:05, 10F

07/02 09:06, , 11F
我認為最後可能落在4年32M左右,雙方都可以接受
07/02 09:06, 11F

07/02 09:07, , 12F
但這樣很像是為了遷就沒人可頂 而沒考慮他能在馬刺打到
07/02 09:07, 12F

07/02 09:08, , 13F
甚麼程度 馬刺會冒這個風險嗎?!這約簽下去就是到TD退休
07/02 09:08, 13F

07/02 11:31, , 14F
突發奇想 RJ先簽後換Josh Childress如何?XD
07/02 11:31, 14F

07/02 11:57, , 15F
這位不熟悉XD 遙想Manu簽約那段時間有文章將其與鷹王成績
07/02 11:57, 15F

07/02 11:58, , 16F
比較,結果鷹王現在看起來還真貴啊 = =
07/02 11:58, 16F

07/02 13:32, , 17F
07/02 13:32, 17F

07/02 13:37, , 18F
當然就Manu這年紀來說算高了,但他年輕時也沒鷹王這麼貴XD
07/02 13:37, 18F

07/02 20:52, , 19F
對太陽確實糟到不能再糟,但說不會是解答...以這幾年NBA盛
07/02 20:52, 19F

07/02 20:53, , 20F
產的搖擺人type來說,用人之前再高評價說大鎖+三分+活動力
07/02 20:53, 20F

07/02 20:54, , 21F
又要怎樣保證某人就會是解答,現在是RJ已磨合1年,大家也都
07/02 20:54, 21F

07/02 20:55, , 22F
應該認為再糟不過如此,那麼為什麼不用已經有一年的基礎來
07/02 20:55, 22F

07/02 20:56, , 23F
創造馬刺自己要的解答? 因為既然現在是谷底,那明年RJ所有
07/02 20:56, 23F

07/02 20:57, , 24F
的表現都可以視為進步不是嗎? 制服組的思考跟八奇.....:p
07/02 20:57, 24F

07/02 22:08, , 25F
3yrs的約勉強可以接受,因為不會妨礙到TD跟Manu退休後的重建
07/02 22:08, 25F

12/12 20:27, 7年前 , 26F
//ppt.cc/od https://noxiv.com
12/12 20:27, 26F
文章代碼(AID): #1CBJQhbf (Spurs)
文章代碼(AID): #1CBJQhbf (Spurs)