[情報]斑馬未來續約可能會跟65場上場規定有關

看板Spurs (聖安東尼奧馬刺)作者keepstudying (keepstudying)時間3小時前 (2025/11/21 09:08)推噓3(3推 0噓 8→)

留言11則, 5人參與討論串1/1

以下翻譯請Gemini初翻，有稍微看過並潤稿傷勢補充：Harper已經被允許可以參加投球練習，但無碰撞 https://tinyurl.com/2s3fhm9h 本新聞在談斑馬的缺賽可能會影響到下一筆合約能夠領的最大薪資問題，尤其斑馬受的是小腿拉傷，他都還可以穿正常運動鞋在場邊練球，這種需仰賴隊醫決定的傷勢的確有可能會引發球員跟球團之間的懷疑。 https://www.expressnews.com/sports/spurs/article/load-management-victor-wembanyama-mvp-rule-21197965.php Why Victor Wembanyama’s upcoming extension exposes flaw in NBA's load management rule 為何 Wembanyama 即將到來的續約，暴露了 NBA 負荷管理規定的缺陷 Sooner or later, the 65-game rule will put interests of players and teams at odds 65 場出賽門檻，遲早會讓球員與球隊的利益陷入對立 By Mike Finger,ColumnistNov 20, 2025 It’s the middle of March, and the superstar thinks he’s ready. He’s been sitting long enough. His calf feels fine, and his teammates need him. (假設)時值三月中旬，這位超級巨星自認已經準備好了。他場邊觀戰夠久了。小腿感覺沒問題，隊友也需要他。 He wants to play. 他想上場。 The team doctors, though, aren’t so sure. They know the risks of returning from an injury like this, even a day too soon. They’re rightfully worried that playing on a calf that hasn’t completely healed might lead to a torn Achilles tendon. 但隊醫們卻不這麼認為。他們深知這種傷勢如果操之過急——哪怕只是提早一天復出—— 所伴隨的風險。他們有充分的理由擔心，用還沒完全痊癒的小腿打球，可能會導致阿基里斯腱斷裂。 So for the sake of the playoffs, and for the sake of the player himself, the team wants him to wait. 因此，為了季後賽著想，也為了球員自身的生涯考量，球隊希望他再等等。 Here’s the catch, though: As spectacular as this particular superstar has been this season, he’s already been forced to sit out 17 games. If he misses just one more, he will be ineligible for the league’s Most Valuable Player award. He’ll be ineligible for Defensive Player of the Year. He’ll be ineligible for the All-NBA team. (這段也是假設)然而，問題來了：儘管這位巨星本賽季的表現令人驚嘆，但他已被迫缺席了 17 場比賽。只要再缺席一場，他將失去角逐聯盟MVP的資格。他也將無法競爭年度最佳防守球員。甚至連年度最佳陣容（All-NBA team）都進不去。 So if the doctors don’t clear him that day? His team stands to save a staggering $55 million on his next contract. 所以，如果那天隊醫不放行呢？球隊在他的下一份合約中，將可省下高達 5500 萬美元的驚人支出。 To be clear, this is an imaginary situation, but it’s not an unlikely one. Something like this is going to happen, if not to Victor Wembanyama and the Spurs, then to some other superstar with some other franchise. 必須澄清的是，這是一個假設的情境，但絕非不可能發生。這種事情遲早會出現，如果不是發生在 Victor Wembanyama 和馬刺隊身上，也會發生在其他球隊的其他超級巨星身上。 When it does, it’s bound to sow unnecessary tension and unnecessary distrust, all stemming from a well-intentioned rule that probably needs to go away. 一旦發生，勢必會埋下不必要的緊張關係與不信任感，而這一切都源於一項立意良善、但也許該被廢除的規則。 Starting two years ago, a provision in the NBA’s collective bargaining agreement stipulates that a player must play at least 65 regular-season games (or play at least 62 before suffering a season-ending injury) to be eligible for the league’s major individual awards. 從兩年前開始，NBA 新版勞資協議（CBA）中包含一項條款：球員必須在例行賽至少出賽 65 場（或是遭遇賽季報銷的傷勢前至少出賽 62 場），才有資格角逐聯盟的主要個人獎項。 This rule was instituted in large part as a response to the perception that some of the biggest draws in the sport were missing too many games due to rest or “load management.” 制定這項規則的主要原因，是為了回應外界的一種觀感：這項運動中最具號召力的球星，因為休息或負荷管理（load management）缺席了太多比賽。 If an MVP candidate had more of an incentive to suit up, the theory went, he might be less likely to skip that Tuesday game when one of his most devoted fans paid hundreds of dollars for the star’s only trip of the year to Charlotte. 理論上而言，如果 MVP 候選人有更多上場的誘因，他就比較不可能跳過某個週二晚上的比賽，不讓那些花了大把鈔票、只為了一睹巨星一年一度造訪夏洛特（Charlotte）風采的死忠球迷失望。 In theory, the idea wasn’t terrible. In execution, though, it’s fraught with problems. One of the biggest is that those individual awards impact how much money players can earn on contract extensions. 理論上，這個想法並不差。但在執行層面，卻充滿了問題。其中最大的問題在於，這些個人獎項直接影響了球員在續約時能拿到多少薪水。 Here's where Wembanyama can serve as a prime example of why it's is flawed. Next summer, before he begins the fourth and final season of his rookie deal, the Spurs will present him with a five-year extension that will pay him about $271 million. It will be the largest offer they’re allowed to make, and it will be way more than Wembanyama could earn if he let his rookie deal lapse, so he will sign it. Wembanyama 正好可以作為一個典型的例子，說明為什麼這個制度有缺陷。明年夏天，在他開始新秀合約的第四年（也是最後一年）之前，馬刺隊將會向他提出一份為期五年、總值約 2.71 億美元的延長合約。這將是球隊在規則允許下能開出的最大合約，金額遠高於 Wembanyama 若讓新秀合約到期後所能獲得的數目，因此他勢必會簽下。 Every star player presented a max extension after his third season signs it. It’s a mere formality. 每一位在第三個賽季後獲得頂薪續約報價的球星都會簽字。這僅僅是一個形式流程。 But under a provision known as the “Derrick Rose rule,” Wembanyama could stand to earn more than that. If he makes an All-NBA team in his fourth season (or twice before that), or is named Defensive Player of the Year next season (or twice before that), or is named Most Valuable Player this year or next, he’d be allowed to earn about $326 million over the course of that same five-year extension. 但在著名的Derrick Rose 條款規定下，Wembanyama 有機會賺得更多。如果他在第四個賽季入選年度最佳陣容（或在此之前入選兩次），或者下個賽季獲選年度最佳防守球員（或在此之前獲選兩次），又或者今明兩年當選MVP，他就將有資格在那份五年延長合約中，拿到約 3.26 億美元的薪資。 That’s 30% of a team’s salary cap instead of 25%, which is a $55 million difference. And even if that extra money isn’t likely to change Wembanyama’ s quality of life — or that of his great grandchildren — he probably wouldn ’t turn it down if he thought he earned it. 這意味著佔球隊薪資上限的比例從 25% 提升到 30%，兩者相差高達 5500 萬美元。雖然這筆額外的錢可能不會改變 Wembanyama 的生活品質——甚至不會影響到他曾孫的生活品質——但如果他認為這是他應得的，他大概也不會拒絕。 Therein lies the problem with the NBA’s 65-game rule. Last season, Wembanyama was so dominant on defense that he led the league in total blocks even while being limited to 46 games due to his February blood-clot diagnosis. Would voters have made him Defensive Player of the Year if he was on the ballot? Maybe or maybe not, but it would have been close. 這正是 NBA 65 場出賽規定的問題癥結所在。上個賽季，Wembanyama 在防守端的宰制力驚人，即使因二月份被診斷出血栓而僅出賽 46 場，他仍以總阻攻數領先全聯盟。如果他具備候選資格，投票者會選他為年度最佳防守球員嗎？也許會，也許不會，但票數肯定會非常接近。 This season, he’s the runaway favorite for the award again, but his left calf strain will cause him to miss at least 10 games before mid-December, and maybe more. If he falls short of 65 games again, that will mark two years in a row the rule kept him from awards he conceivably deserved to win. With both of them on his shelf, he’d be eligible for the larger extension before he signs it. 本賽季，他再次成為該獎項遙遙領先的大熱門，但他左小腿的拉傷將導致他在 12 月中旬之前至少缺席 10 場比賽，甚至更多。如果他的出賽場次再次低於 65 場，這將標誌著這項規則連續兩年將他拒於本該屬於他的獎項門外。而如果這兩座獎項都能收入囊中，他在簽約前就具備了獲得那份頂級續約的資格。 Now, does this mean there’s going to be a showdown between Wembanyama and the Spurs over his injury status? Of course not. Well into his third season in San Antonio, he’s never given a single indication that he doesn’t see eye-to-eye with the Spurs on any piece of their plan – big-picture or small. 那麼，這是否意味著 Wembanyama 和馬刺隊會因為傷病狀況而發生衝突？當然不會。他在聖安東尼奧的生涯已進入第三個賽季，無論是球隊的宏觀藍圖還是微小細節，他從未表現出與馬刺隊理念不合的跡象。 But look around the league. With the pace of play faster than ever before, and with even big men like Wembanyama moving non-stop at both ends of the court, there are All-NBA-caliber players dealing with soft-tissue injuries all over the place. It’s far from crazy to think that at least one or two of them will miss out on an award, for no other reason than they fall a game or two short of an arbitrary threshold. 但放眼全聯盟，隨著比賽節奏前所未有的快速，加上連 Wembanyama 這種長人都得在攻防兩端不停移動，到處都有具備年度最佳陣容實力的球員正受軟組織傷勢所苦。完全可以想像，至少會有一兩位球員因此錯失獎項，而原因僅僅是因為他們距離那個武斷設定的門檻，差了一兩場比賽。 Granted, tying contract dollars to awards voting isn’t a great system. But if you’re going to trust the voters to pick the best players, you might as well trust their judgment as to what constitutes an award-worthy season. 誠然，將合約金額與獎項投票掛鉤並非一個完善的制度。但既然你願意相信投票者能選出最好的球員，那你也不妨相信他們的判斷力，讓他們決定怎樣的賽季表現才配得上獲獎。 Otherwise, if the 65-game rule isn’t changed, someday a team doctor will advise a superstar to sit out one more night. 否則，如果 65 場出賽規定不改，總有一天會有隊醫建議某位超級巨星再多休戰一晚。 And the superstar will have reason to wonder why. 而那位巨星將會有理由質疑其中的動機。 Nov 20, 2025 Mike Finger Sports Columnist -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.120.78.235 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Spurs/M.1763687336.A.7D6.html