Re: [新聞] 紅襪疑違反海外簽約規定 大聯盟展開調查已回收
: 如果這樣子合法。
: 那聯盟調查什麼意思來著？聯盟憑什麼調查？聯盟哪來的權力去侵門踏戶抓球員問話？
: 就是因為這樣不合法，所以想用模糊地帶私下亂搞的，裝就要裝得夠像。
: 不是只有紅襪這樣玩，但搞到被調查應該是第一次
: 合法不合法，與逃不逃得過制裁是兩碼子事啊
:
: 老話一句，這樣子當然不合法！因為不合法，所以很多被限制的球團很客氣偷偷玩。
: 假如這樣合法，那被罰的球團吃像會更難看。
來看BA的原文吧
http://tinyurl.com/ztneqlx
Aside from the particulars of how the questioning was handled, why MLB is
investigating the Red Sox at all—as well as the timing of the investigation—
is certainly curious. Package deals are not explicitly against MLB rules,
and many teams sign multiple players from the same trainer, either at the same
time or over a multi-year period. These deals took place before the bonus
pools ever existed and have continued since the bonus pool era began in 2012.
No team has ever been penalized for doing any type of package deal, according
to the commissioner’s office.
"Package deals沒有明確違反大聯盟規定"
Package deals早在新制IFA上路前就行之有年,而且還可能是多年的package deals
譬如今年多給某個經紀人下面的球員錢,明年少拿一點這樣
而為什麼大聯盟會開始調查,是因為發現他們制度有漏洞
package deals這樣做本身沒錯 但是會違反IFA的制度
所以才會說要罰紅襪
如果package deal本身有違反制度的話 MLB必須要有一定的罰則
可是到現在MLB要怎麼罰 罰多少 以什麼樣的形式罰 罰誰都不清楚
才會說package deal並沒有明確寫在規定裡
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 96.93.71.126
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1463040965.A.D57.html
※ 編輯: WillWaiting (96.93.71.126), 05/12/2016 16:16:22
→
05/12 16:17, , 1F
05/12 16:17, 1F
→
05/12 16:17, , 2F
05/12 16:17, 2F
→
05/12 16:19, , 3F
05/12 16:19, 3F
→
05/12 16:20, , 4F
05/12 16:20, 4F
推
05/12 16:27, , 5F
05/12 16:27, 5F
→
05/12 16:27, , 6F
05/12 16:27, 6F
→
05/12 16:28, , 7F
05/12 16:28, 7F
→
05/12 16:29, , 8F
05/12 16:29, 8F
→
05/12 16:29, , 9F
05/12 16:29, 9F
→
05/12 16:29, , 10F
05/12 16:29, 10F
→
05/12 16:30, , 11F
05/12 16:30, 11F
推
05/12 16:33, , 12F
05/12 16:33, 12F
推
05/12 16:34, , 13F
05/12 16:34, 13F
推
05/12 16:40, , 14F
05/12 16:40, 14F
推
05/12 19:30, , 15F
05/12 19:30, 15F
推
05/13 01:12, , 16F
05/13 01:12, 16F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 4 篇)：
Baseball 近期熱門文章
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
26
40
