Re: [情報] 裁判組蘇建文組長針對12局下半Play說明已回收
※ 引述《sam92084 (電腦球評)》之銘言:
: 以下是蘇建文老師在社團內的公開說明
: -------
: 賽後我們為了確認球是否夾住?特地到外野牆邊察看,模擬該球的位置,發現夾縫之高度
: 約有3顆球高,所以夾住之可能性排除~裁判第一時間也判定比賽進行中無誤~至於影片
: 中之顯示,是因外野全壘打牆護壂及帆布厚度之故,會看不到球,其實由正面看野手是很
: 容易拿到球的~至於大家討論如果形成死球又會給予幾個壘?該飛球碰觸牆反彈又碰觸野
: 手後,給予壘的基準點,並不是依投手投球時佔有壘給予,而是野手碰觸球當時的佔有壘
: 給予二個壘,今天是二出局一壘有跑者,外野手碰觸球時已越過二壘,顯然致勝分已定
先說我非吱
但我不懂推文酸紅中的point在哪
當時的情況是,球卡在全壘打牆的當下
大王用手指了全壘打牆下緣
紅中在休息室的角度看,理所當然的會認為這球有判場地安打的空間
他也沒有轉播單位的角度可以跟我們一樣看到當時的情況
而在每個play後教練提出挑戰是有時間限制的
所以紅中總不可能等大王回來時詢問當時的情況
或者衝到全壘打牆前看那個縫到底有多大
看完裁判根本不會理你了
這球又是致勝分,幫整個球隊爭取權益有錯嗎?
無論大王是否在演戲
但我認為紅中只是盡了他做教練的義務而已
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.170.35.55
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1491668393.A.3C4.html
推
04/09 00:20, , 1F
04/09 00:20, 1F
→
04/09 00:20, , 2F
04/09 00:20, 2F
推
04/09 00:20, , 3F
04/09 00:20, 3F
推
04/09 00:21, , 4F
04/09 00:21, 4F
推
04/09 00:21, , 5F
04/09 00:21, 5F
推
04/09 00:21, , 6F
04/09 00:21, 6F
→
04/09 00:21, , 7F
04/09 00:21, 7F
→
04/09 00:21, , 8F
04/09 00:21, 8F
→
04/09 00:21, , 9F
04/09 00:21, 9F
→
04/09 00:21, , 10F
04/09 00:21, 10F
推
04/09 00:22, , 11F
04/09 00:22, 11F
→
04/09 00:22, , 12F
04/09 00:22, 12F
推
04/09 00:22, , 13F
04/09 00:22, 13F
推
04/09 00:23, , 14F
04/09 00:23, 14F
噓
04/09 00:23, , 15F
04/09 00:23, 15F
→
04/09 00:23, , 16F
04/09 00:23, 16F
→
04/09 00:24, , 17F
04/09 00:24, 17F
推
04/09 00:24, , 18F
04/09 00:24, 18F
推
04/09 00:25, , 19F
04/09 00:25, 19F
→
04/09 00:26, , 20F
04/09 00:26, 20F
→
04/09 00:27, , 21F
04/09 00:27, 21F
推
04/09 00:27, , 22F
04/09 00:27, 22F
噓
04/09 00:28, , 23F
04/09 00:28, 23F
→
04/09 00:28, , 24F
04/09 00:28, 24F
推
04/09 00:28, , 25F
04/09 00:28, 25F
推
04/09 00:28, , 26F
04/09 00:28, 26F
推
04/09 00:29, , 27F
04/09 00:29, 27F
推
04/09 00:29, , 28F
04/09 00:29, 28F
推
04/09 00:30, , 29F
04/09 00:30, 29F
推
04/09 00:30, , 30F
04/09 00:30, 30F
→
04/09 00:32, , 31F
04/09 00:32, 31F
推
04/09 00:33, , 32F
04/09 00:33, 32F
→
04/09 00:34, , 33F
04/09 00:34, 33F
推
04/09 00:34, , 34F
04/09 00:34, 34F
→
04/09 00:34, , 35F
04/09 00:34, 35F
推
04/09 00:35, , 36F
04/09 00:35, 36F
→
04/09 00:35, , 37F
04/09 00:35, 37F
推
04/09 00:36, , 38F
04/09 00:36, 38F
→
04/09 00:37, , 39F
04/09 00:37, 39F
推
04/09 00:37, , 40F
04/09 00:37, 40F
→
04/09 00:37, , 41F
04/09 00:37, 41F
推
04/09 00:37, , 42F
04/09 00:37, 42F
→
04/09 00:37, , 43F
04/09 00:37, 43F
→
04/09 00:38, , 44F
04/09 00:38, 44F
→
04/09 00:38, , 45F
04/09 00:38, 45F
推
04/09 00:39, , 46F
04/09 00:39, 46F
→
04/09 00:40, , 47F
04/09 00:40, 47F
推
04/09 00:40, , 48F
04/09 00:40, 48F
→
04/09 00:40, , 49F
04/09 00:40, 49F
推
04/09 00:41, , 50F
04/09 00:41, 50F
推
04/09 00:43, , 51F
04/09 00:43, 51F
推
04/09 00:43, , 52F
04/09 00:43, 52F
→
04/09 00:43, , 53F
04/09 00:43, 53F
推
04/09 00:44, , 54F
04/09 00:44, 54F
→
04/09 00:44, , 55F
04/09 00:44, 55F
→
04/09 00:45, , 56F
04/09 00:45, 56F
推
04/09 00:46, , 57F
04/09 00:46, 57F
推
04/09 00:49, , 58F
04/09 00:49, 58F
→
04/09 00:49, , 59F
04/09 00:49, 59F
→
04/09 00:52, , 60F
04/09 00:52, 60F
→
04/09 00:55, , 61F
04/09 00:55, 61F
推
04/09 01:10, , 62F
04/09 01:10, 62F
推
04/09 01:10, , 63F
04/09 01:10, 63F
→
04/09 01:10, , 64F
04/09 01:10, 64F
→
04/09 01:11, , 65F
04/09 01:11, 65F
→
04/09 01:11, , 66F
04/09 01:11, 66F
推
04/09 01:11, , 67F
04/09 01:11, 67F
我本來也是那種都不把酸民的話當一回事的
但是這次真的讓我看不下去了
紅中盡教練的義務也要酸
在當時那種情況,難道紅中要不發一語讓對手輕鬆拿下致勝分?
就連在板上形象應該還不錯的史總,應該都會帶著翻譯衝出來了
※ 編輯: edward8726 (118.170.35.55), 04/09/2017 01:17:14
推
04/09 01:14, , 68F
04/09 01:14, 68F
推
04/09 01:15, , 69F
04/09 01:15, 69F
推
04/09 01:15, , 70F
04/09 01:15, 70F
→
04/09 01:15, , 71F
04/09 01:15, 71F
噓
04/09 01:49, , 72F
04/09 01:49, 72F
推
04/09 01:54, , 73F
04/09 01:54, 73F
噓
04/09 01:59, , 74F
04/09 01:59, 74F
推
04/09 02:29, , 75F
04/09 02:29, 75F
推
04/09 03:33, , 76F
04/09 03:33, 76F
推
04/09 08:49, , 77F
04/09 08:49, 77F
推
04/09 09:19, , 78F
04/09 09:19, 78F
推
04/09 11:44, , 79F
04/09 11:44, 79F
→
04/09 11:44, , 80F
04/09 11:44, 80F
→
12/09 19:57,
6年前
, 81F
12/09 19:57, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
Baseball 近期熱門文章
21
28
17
32
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
35
65