[外電] 裁判談今天的驅逐出場

看板Celtics (波士頓 塞爾提克)作者 (Be a Green Forever&ever)時間13年前 (2012/11/29 14:52), 編輯推噓21(21020)
留言41則, 20人參與, 最新討論串1/1
新聞出處(必填): http://ppt.cc/e2T3 Q: What specifically prompted the ejection of Rondo? Capers: Rondo initiated everything that proceeded after the foul. And when he and Humphries go into the stands, they are involved in a fight. Fighting is an automatic ejection. 問:Rondo主要被驅逐的理由是? 答:打架。 Q: What were the reasons for the two technical fouls on Humphries? Capers: When Kevin goes to the basket, he is rerouted by Humphries. So we had a personal foul for the reroute. Kevin is trying to continue -- to get a continuation by shooting -- and now Humphries hits him. Because the whistle blew, it was a dead-ball situation, and that's a technical foul for contact during a dead ball ... What proceeds after that is a fight, so he's ejected. 問:憨佛為什麼被吹了兩個技術犯規? 答:當KG要上籃時,被憨佛犯規。而KG想繼續完成投籃動作,然後憨佛了他。 因為已經吹哨,所以是死球狀態,在死球狀態有肢體接觸就會吹技術犯規。而 第二個技術犯規則是打架。 Q: Did Wallace or Garnett throw a punch? Capers: As we reviewed it, no. They aggressively went to one another, and they basically pushed and extended on one another, but there was not a punch thrown. 問:G蛙跟KG有揮拳嗎? 答:我們重看影片是沒有。他們很積極衝向彼此,也有推擠彼此,但沒揮拳。 Q:What prompted their technicals? Capers: For the escalating of the event. And then Wallace (already) had one, so therefore he was ejected. 問:那為什麼他們兩個會被吹技術犯規? 答:因為他們擴大這次的衝突。而G蛙先前已經有一個技術犯規,所以得到一次出場卷。 --- 我看裁判在KG被打到的當下沒有吹技術犯規的打算阿。 -- It start with 6,then 17 ,then 33 ,then 34 ,then 9. It's all about Pride and Responsibility. And the Cigar. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.166.196.202

11/29 15:24, , 1F
對阿 馬後炮 要是軟豆沒衝這球還不是算了
11/29 15:24, 1F

11/29 15:29, , 2F
老實說上半場哨音有點不公平,賽隊都沒罰球
11/29 15:29, 2F

11/29 16:58, , 3F
軟豆真的太衝了,要成為聯盟頂級球星真的要多向前輩
11/29 16:58, 3F

11/29 16:58, , 4F
學學
11/29 16:58, 4F

11/29 17:04, , 5F
一堆人衝進去救Rondo Jet被拉住 結果最後是PP救到 XD
11/29 17:04, 5F

11/29 17:14, , 6F
今天比賽好像很多事件......沒跟到比賽qq
11/29 17:14, 6F

11/29 17:33, , 7F
rondo太衝了................
11/29 17:33, 7F

11/29 17:41, , 8F
看了影片覺得Rondo去推人導致衝突真的很沒必要...
11/29 17:41, 8F

11/29 17:42, , 9F
但是 如果他沒去幹架的話裁判也是不可能會吹憨佛那個
11/29 17:42, 9F

11/29 17:43, , 10F
對KG下手的T就是了.........
11/29 17:43, 10F

11/29 17:43, , 11F
他這樣把球隊氣氛搞差是最要不得的
11/29 17:43, 11F

11/29 17:44, , 12F
是不會搞差啦...不過真的沒那個必要...
11/29 17:44, 12F

11/29 17:45, , 13F
加油好嗎?阿豆
11/29 17:45, 13F

11/29 17:50, , 14F
覺得阿豆有牌子後 有些時候氣燄太過頭了點,像是推
11/29 17:50, 14F

11/29 17:51, , 15F
人或幫隊友出氣,應該要像他以前冷靜點 甚至還會主動
11/29 17:51, 15F

11/29 17:53, , 16F
做對方犯規。 Rondo這情緒控管真的還不成氣候
11/29 17:53, 16F

11/29 17:54, , 17F
我反而球隊氣氛變得更團結耶
11/29 17:54, 17F

11/29 18:01, , 18F
KG被尻 要是沒人有表示才奇怪...
11/29 18:01, 18F

11/29 18:02, , 19F
前幾年PP倒在地上 KG連讓對方球員去察看傷勢都不肯
11/29 18:02, 19F

11/29 18:04, , 20F
阿豆去找憨佛理論是對的,但動手有點過分了
11/29 18:04, 20F

11/29 18:04, , 21F
幹架後沒在主場贏球比較嘔...XD (雖然暴力是不對的)
11/29 18:04, 21F

11/29 18:05, , 22F
此後KG跟阿豆感情應該會更棒就是XD
11/29 18:05, 22F

11/29 18:37, , 23F
去護隊友是一定要的...只是沒必要演變成幹架就是了
11/29 18:37, 23F

11/29 18:57, , 24F
這讓我想到之前RR推MWP的那一次 開頭還蠻相似的
11/29 18:57, 24F

11/29 19:48, , 25F
這算有幹架嗎.我覺得只是推擠而已~
11/29 19:48, 25F

11/29 19:56, , 26F
看起來是推擠..而且在KG被惡意犯規後..做出激烈的反
11/29 19:56, 26F

11/29 19:56, , 27F
真要幹架才不是這樣咧
11/29 19:56, 27F

11/29 19:56, , 28F
應..這件事..個人是表示贊同的..我們可是鐵血球隊
11/29 19:56, 28F

11/29 20:02, , 29F
Rondo推憨佛時根本沒看著他
11/29 20:02, 29F

11/29 20:03, , 30F
11/29 20:03, 30F

11/29 20:03, , 31F
講Rondo要被驅逐了XDDD
11/29 20:03, 31F

11/29 20:04, , 32F
輸就痛
11/29 20:04, 32F

11/29 21:07, , 33F
Rondo幹的好!若Rondo沒動手,可能KG就自己動手了
11/29 21:07, 33F

11/29 21:08, , 34F
只能推Rondo了
11/29 21:08, 34F

11/29 21:15, , 35F
球隊氣氛哪會不好?
11/29 21:15, 35F

11/29 21:25, , 36F
球隊氣氛不會不好啦 希望不要再有氣無力了
11/29 21:25, 36F

11/29 22:23, , 37F
Rondo其實就偷推一下,沒想到對方反應也很大…才失控
11/29 22:23, 37F

11/29 22:25, , 38F
要不要動手大概就1秒的反應吧...
11/29 22:25, 38F

11/29 22:26, , 39F
Humphries的動作更大...但先動手就輸了,等禁賽
11/29 22:26, 39F

11/29 22:58, , 40F
是不算打架沒錯啦 現在的球員敢真的揮拳幹架也沒幾個
11/29 22:58, 40F

11/29 22:59, , 41F
同意TT大
11/29 22:59, 41F
文章代碼(AID): #1GjmP1PS (Celtics)
文章代碼(AID): #1GjmP1PS (Celtics)