[情報] 俱樂部準備向CPO買回球場土地所有權

看板Chelsea作者 (首席百人隊長)時間14年前 (2011/10/05 02:44), 4年前編輯推噓3(3018)
留言21則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://china.chelseafc.com/news/latest/323 切爾西俱樂部的球場計劃 上載於 : 2011年10月5日 星期三 14:00 切爾西俱樂部今天提出了收回斯坦福橋所有權的計劃,希望將過去賣給球隊支持 者的球場所有權收回。 目前這所有權屬於一個叫做 "切爾西球場所有者" 的公司(CPO),這家公司成立 於1993年,目的是阻止斯坦福橋會落入地產開發商之手,陷入危機,被視為財政上與 地產商的抗衡機購。 不過,在阿布拉莫維奇買下切爾西後,我們認為這個公司已經沒有了它的存在必 要性。現在,切爾西希望買回該公司所有者手裡的股份。14年前每股的價格只有100 英鎊,切爾西希望原價收回。 斯坦福橋在1905年進行了我們第一場主場比賽,此後一直就是我們唯一的球場, 但自從阿布拉莫維奇在03年買下俱樂部後,我們在世界上的受歡迎的程度一直不斷提 升,加上整個足球世界資金流入的潛規則正在轉變,一個入座率有限的球場,可能會 限制了我們的擴張。我們沒有計劃要遷移主場,但從球隊支持者手上買回股份消除潛 在的障礙,有利我們未來對球場擴建的發展。 It has always been the desire of the club's owner and directors that Chelsea should remain at Stamford Bridge as long as the stadium meets our needs. Many potential ways for increasing capacity have been studied. 關於擴建的計劃,一些調查仍在進行,但鄰近的鐵路線、樓房及有限的出口成為 了最大的障礙,使我們的比賽收入無法與其他競爭對手比較。 The proposed transaction would also make it possible for CPO to offer to buy back shares from shareholders if it so wishes. The club will enter into a legal commitment to CPO that no relocation will take place before 2020 unless it is within a three-mile radius of our current home. 俱樂部的提案也包括重建一個容量至少達55000人的新球場,其中最少10%的座位 將會提供給一家大小以及21歲以下的支持者。 Recognising what an important part in our history CPO has played, its shareholders who vote in favour of the transaction will be named in a walk or roll of honour at a new stadium should we move. 他們也將有購買季票的優先權。 After its 1993 launch CPO raised funds, by the sale of shares, with a view to acquiring the freehold and putting it out of the grasp of developers, but was considerably short of the amount needed when in 1997 the club was able to lend CPO the approximately £10 million needed. CPO then granted us a 199-year lease for the stadium site at a peppercorn rent. 到現在為止,CPO已經出售了約15000股份,籌集了150萬鎊,但它們絕不是為了 賺取利潤或支付股息。 CPO的常務會議將會在10月27日舉行,一眾股東將表決對這項提議贊成與否,如 果有股東未能出席,我們也會發送委任表格給他們。 切爾西主席巴克說:「切爾西永遠感謝那些投資在CPO的股東。我們瞭解切爾西 將近失去我們的主場之前,CPO的成立給我們帶來的幫助,但這一威脅現在已經在阿 布拉莫維奇先生的擁有下解除,CPO的結構反而會讓未來變得不明確,我希望所有的 股東表決贊成建議。」 首席執行官古爾雷補充說:「我肯定切爾西所有球迷享受球隊在2003年以來的成 功,俱樂部及阿布拉莫維奇先生決心要讓球隊繼續在世界最高水平的比賽中競爭。我 們正在觀察關於斯坦福橋的擴建計劃,而我也想要澄清,我們並沒有找到一個新的地 址去建立一個新球場。」 CPO shareholders who do not receive documentation on the proposal and a proxy form can arrange to do so via one of the following: Email address: cpomeeting@btconnect.com Phone number: 020 7386 3388 For more information go to: http://www.chelseapitchowners.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.skysports.com/story/0,,11668_7220774,00.html Blues make stadium share offer Last Updated: October 4, 2011 8:38am "Bear in mind that no one bought these shares as a financial investment," said Buck. "Everyone bought these shares as a way of helping the club and they also bought them as mementoes and souvenirs. "We haven't considered making them a big offer because we believe that they are fans of Chelsea Football Club and want to do what's best for Chelsea Football Club and we've offered them a couple of things relating to their role as a fan." Buck insisted the club had explored the possibility of redeveloping Stamford Bridge but that every idea put forward had proven impractical or just too expensive. He added: "I wouldn't say that we've given up but, after five or six years of looking at it, I would say that we're doubtful that we could do something at a reasonable cost." --------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.skysports.com/story/0,,20876_7222829,00.html Chelsea yet to decide on move Last Updated: October 4, 2011 5:57pm "At the moment we have had no discussions ongoing with any developer," Buck is quoted as saying in The Independent. "We still have not made the decision that yes, Chelsea want to move. "More significantly, we are looking at whether our stadium might be the right size. With people [potentially] watching matches on their wristwatches in the great digital unknown, do we know what the right size is for Chelsea or any other club? "At the moment I am saying we are happy at Stamford Bridge. We have no concrete intentions to move but just like any business looking at the future we look at anything that comes along." -- http://jamescaesar.pixnet.net/album/photo/110781933 永遠以摸過它為榮 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.39.145.84

10/05 02:45, , 1F
昨天預備隊比賽一結束CTV馬上就跑馬燈快報
10/05 02:45, 1F

10/05 02:45, , 2F
然後跑馬燈立刻消毒說還沒決定搬球場
10/05 02:45, 2F

10/05 02:46, , 3F
這件事最近一定吵翻天
10/05 02:46, 3F

10/05 02:57, , 4F
應該是怕阿布哪天就不支持了吧
10/05 02:57, 4F

10/05 03:12, , 5F
跟阿布沒太大關係,主要是一直以來都有很多人反對搬
10/05 03:12, 5F

10/05 03:13, , 6F
官網這篇要搬的意圖就太明顯了
10/05 03:13, 6F

10/05 03:30, , 7F
那個 換大球場不好嗎? 北倫敦那兩隻一個說要搬正在戰戰兢兢
10/05 03:30, 7F

10/05 03:30, , 8F
籌錢 另一隻省吃儉用還到現在還沒還清連帶拿戰績去還
10/05 03:30, 8F

10/05 12:29, , 9F
原因很多,隨便找一個 http://tinyurl.com/3u6m8q8
10/05 12:29, 9F

10/05 19:58, , 10F
這道理就像Red Sox的Fenway Park一樣,老Boston人一定
10/05 19:58, 10F

10/05 19:59, , 11F
要在粉味公園裏看棒球才自在,球票再貴也讓你場場滿
10/05 19:59, 11F

10/05 20:15, , 12F
紅襪老闆John Henry剛接手經營球隊的時候也曾計畫要蓋新
10/05 20:15, 12F

10/05 20:16, , 13F
球場,結果就是老Boston人以拒買季票當手段,揚言離開
10/05 20:16, 13F

10/05 20:18, , 14F
Fenway Park就不買票看Red Sox的比賽,最後John Henry也
10/05 20:18, 14F

10/05 20:20, , 15F
只能妥協,改建粉味公園來增加座席,以前綠色怪物上面是
10/05 20:20, 15F

10/05 20:20, , 16F
沒有座位的,那是後來才改建出來的。
10/05 20:20, 16F

10/05 20:24, , 17F
講那麼多,結論是我不認為老西倫敦人會離開Stamford
10/05 20:24, 17F

10/05 20:25, , 18F
Bridge,所以我覺得CPO成員應該不會賣掉他們手上的持股
10/05 20:25, 18F

10/05 20:27, , 19F
因為他們本來就沒打算要拿它來圖利,那是West London的
10/05 20:27, 19F

10/05 20:27, , 20F
驕傲
10/05 20:27, 20F

10/06 00:39, , 21F
10/06 00:39, 21F
※ 編輯: JamesCaesar (111.249.232.105 臺灣), 03/04/2022 17:50:39
文章代碼(AID): #1EYrF-e0 (Chelsea)
文章代碼(AID): #1EYrF-e0 (Chelsea)