[情報] 球迷號召保衛斯坦福橋球場

看板Chelsea作者JamesCaesar (首席百人隊長)時間14年前 (2011/10/06 01:40)推噓3(3推 0噓 13→)

留言16則, 5人參與討論串1/1

http://news.goalhi.com/201110/104917.html 部分切爾西球迷策劃保衛斯坦福橋的運動 2011-10-05 10:51:04 | 作者：schelotto | 來源：Dailymail 在俱樂部開始籌劃收購斯坦福橋的土地所有權後，切爾西球迷開始組織一場保衛斯坦福橋的運動。“切爾西球場所有人（CPO）”組織曾經在上世紀九十年代買下了斯坦福橋球場的土地所有權，目的是為了防止所有權落入房地產商之手。 CPO的股份所有者對球隊的舉措表示不滿，因為切爾西只給了他們不滿三週的時間來決定股東大會的投票。很多持有CPO股份的切爾西球迷將在下週對是否出售股權展開辯論。 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2045326/Chelsea-fans- campaign-save-Stamford-Bridge.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.london24.com/sport/chelsea/exclusive_two_cpo_s_confirm_they_ will_reject_chelsea_offer_1_1079783 Exclusive- Two CPO's confirm they will reject Chelsea offer Matt Diner, London24 sports editor Tuesday, October 4, 2011 5:30 PM Two members of the Chelsea Pitch Owners (CPO) have told London24 they will not sell their shares to the club. 兩名CPO股東說他們不會出售股份給俱樂部。 The Blues yesterday submitted plans to buy the 15,000 shares from the individuals within the organisation in a move many feel is designed to begin the process of leaving Stamford Bridge. 昨天的收購新聞讓很多人覺得這是搬家的啟動程序。 The club have denied it is a certainty, but whether they move or not, James Greenbury believes the organisation, which was founded in 1993 should remain in place. 不論搬是不搬，James Greenbury 都認為CPO應該繼續存在。 “Unless it is compulsory it will be a no vote from me,” the CPO shareholder said. “There will always be a purpose for the CPO because we are there to protect the club from property developers, taking away our ground, wherever that they may be. "除非是強制性的，不然我會投反對票。CPO的目的一直是保護俱樂部，防止房地產商搶走我們的球場。" “I would be perfectly happy to move if the CPO were to remain in place and it were not far from our current location. "如果CPO繼續存在，新球場離大橋也不遠，搬家我也很高興。" “I trust Roman Abramovich and this is no slight against him, however taking away the ownership I feel leaves us vulnerable.” "我信任阿布，完全不想反對他，但我覺得我們不該失去所有權。" Do Chelsea even need to leave Stamford Bridge? The Blues failed to sell out their Champions League match against Bayer Leverkusen recently in their 41,000 stadium, so why do they need 60,000 seats? 卻爾西真的需要離開斯坦福橋嗎？現有的41000個坐位連歐冠小組賽第一場對勒沃庫森都坐不滿，為什麼需要60000人大球場？ “There is no chance I will sell my shares. We don't need to move and we don't fill our stadium at the moment, so how would moving to a bigger ground work?” Theresa Magee another CPO shareholder said. Theresa Magee 認為: "我絕不出售手上的股份，我們不需要搬家，而且現在球場也塞不滿人，所以何必搬到更大的球場？" “Also if we move after 2020 there are no guarantees we would be staying within the vicinity.” "況且2020年後搬家，也不能保證留在現在這個區域。" The club have promised if they do move before that date they will stay within a three mile radius of the ground, with sites in Earl's Court and Imperial Wharf cited as possible destinations. 目前俱樂部開出的條件是2020年前搬家，新球場會在大橋的三英里內。 (伯爵宮和帝國碼頭都是可能的地點) “Anything could happen after 2020, they could move us anywhere and at the moment they are asking us to trust them, but they must be more specific with their plans, they could move us into Wembley for all we know,” said Martin Rowe of CFC net. CFCnet 的 Martin Rowe表示: "2020年後他們可能會搬到任何地方。目前他們要求我們的全面信任，但他們的計劃必須更明確。據我們所知，甚至可能會搬去溫布里。" “Two weeks ago at the fans forum which took place at Stamford Bridge we were told that there were no announcements to make about relocating or increasing capacity. "兩週前在大橋舉行的球迷論壇，我們被告知沒有任何的搬家或擴建宣告。" “I believe the fact that QPR and Fulham have mooted the idea of moving has kicked us into action because we will be competing with them for available land.” "我認為QPR和富勒姆的搬家構想讓我們不得不動起來，因為這關係到可用土地的競爭。" A CPO meeting will be held on October 27 where shareholders are requested to cast their vote, either in person or by form. Votes which are not cast will be assumed to support Chelsea's proposals to buy the shares. For all the latest Chelsea news follow us on twitter @ChelseaFC_Lon24 -- 以伊露維塔的名為證發誓 — 若有誰敢奪取屬於我們的藍色之心，不論對方是天使、惡魔、男人或女人，包括尚未出生者，若有任何的生靈，不論偉大或渺小，是善還是惡，我們都將懷著復仇與憎恨之心直追到天涯海角，直追到世界結束之日。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.38.240.113