[情報] 巴克談特里、種歧、阿布、慈善、球場

看板Chelsea作者JamesCaesar (首席百人隊長)時間13年前 (2012/11/14 17:53)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串1/1

http://sports.163.com/12/1114/15/8G9GVULF00051CCL.html 2012-11-14 15:19:50　來源: 網易體育過去一年多來，切爾西一直被種族歧視所困擾。在特里種歧安東˙費迪南德的案件中，切爾西堅決站在特里這一邊。但在最近，切爾西主動向英足總投訴裁判克拉滕伯格種歧米克爾，輿論一片嘩然。之前力挺種歧肇事者特里，現在又以受害者身份追究克拉滕伯格，如此雙重標準不禁讓輿論視切爾西為“偽君子”。日前，切爾西主席布魯斯-巴克接受《倫敦標準晚報》的長專訪，對種種爭議做出了詳細的解釋。巴克首先強調，支持特里只是出於“關愛”，並非袒護他的錯誤，“我們有義務代替特里的父母來關愛他。但我們這樣做，並不是說如果特里做錯事，我們會說他沒有做錯事。我們支持他這是出於人性關懷。這不代表無論特里做什麼，我們都認同。” 特里被法庭宣判無罪，但是被英足總認定對小費迪南德說了帶有種族歧視字樣的話，特里被禁賽4場並罰款22萬英鎊。切爾西事後也對特里進行了內部處罰，但拒絕公開處罰內容。巴克補充道，切爾西絕不是特里“掌控”的球隊，俱樂部話事人乃是老闆阿布。巴克說，“我不能否認這一點，事實上過去10年特里和切爾西捲入了很多公共事件。切爾西不是特里掌管的俱樂部，我不知道如何證明這一點，但這是事實。我的俱樂部歸羅曼˙阿布拉莫維奇掌管。” 切爾西被輿論視為偽君子，巴克也有話要說，他強調，特里事件和克拉滕伯格事件並無關聯。 “媒體把我們支持特里和我們投訴克拉滕伯格這兩件事放在一起看，並將我們視為偽君子。我們必須要指出的是，這兩件事並無關聯。對我們來說，投訴克拉滕伯格是很容易理解的。我們有義務投訴他人的不當行為，我們這麼做是誠信使然，而不是惡意中傷。” 職業是美國律師的巴克指出，向英足總上告克拉滕伯格的種歧行為，是出於遵守英足總的規定以及遵守勞工法，這是很自然的結果。 “英足總的規則寫得很清楚，俱樂部遭遇對方不當行為後應該立即上告英足總，英足總的條文將種族歧視行為定性為不當行為。另外，按照勞工法的規定，當我們的僱員（球員）遭遇第三方種族歧視後，我們也有義務為他們維權。”克拉滕伯格對米克爾說出“猴子”這樣的種歧字眼，這源自拉米雷斯和路易斯的檢舉。巴克同時指出，如果切爾西知情不報，那麼一旦案情洩露，切爾西將會被釘在十字架上拷問。 “假設，我們想把此事（克拉滕伯格種歧米克爾）隱瞞下來，並對我們的球員說『這不是什麼大不了的事，要是把這件事公開，媒體會全部盯著我們看，或許你們得重新考慮一下。』如果這件事被洩露出去，我們真的會被迫害。” 輿論還有一種論調是，切爾西狀告克拉滕伯格，是對克拉滕伯格罰下托雷斯和判罰埃爾南德斯越位進球有效的報復。巴克強調，俱樂部絕對沒有刻意針對裁判的意思。 “我認為外界的反應對我們非常不公平，我們沒有任何興趣去對抗裁判或者針對某某人，我們也沒有報復裁判的想法。克拉滕伯格犯了兩個明顯的錯誤，這改變了比賽的走勢。我認為切爾西就是一塊道德高地，我真的沒有覺得那場失利有多遭，或者說我的內心有這樣的想法。我認為第二天的報紙也對我們很友好。我們狀告克拉滕伯格，這是經過了深思熟慮、以及長時間的討論後的結果。” 談到博阿斯的下課，巴克否認是球員逼宮逼走了博阿斯，是阿布親手決定終止博阿斯的合同。 “不，我們不需要球員們告訴我們該怎麼做。我很清楚該怎麼做，阿布拉莫維奇先生也很清楚。當時我們在英超成績糟糕，歐冠也瀕臨被淘汰，是阿布決定終止博阿斯的合同。這次改變顯然是正確的，我們贏得了兩座獎盃。我希望聽到你們（記者）祝賀阿布拉莫維奇先生和切爾西做出了這個改變。” 值得一提的是，由於終止合同的單詞 terminate 與電影《終結者》（The Terminator）有異曲同工之妙，《每日郵報》也形象地將阿布拉莫維奇PS成了施瓦辛格的終結者形象。 (本文來源：網易體育作者：lewilee) http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/chelsea-chairman-wed-have-been- really-crucified-if-we-had-not-reported-clattenburg-and-it-then-leaked-out -8312146.html Mihir Bose - 13 November 2012 其餘內容.... BUCK'S VIEW ON ... == JOHN TERRY == We have a duty of care to John Terry in loco parentis. Not that, if he did something wrong, we weren't going to say he didn't do anything wrong. But we have to support him as a person. That's different from saying that, no matter what Terry does, we approve. There are things players would do that we don't approve of but that doesn't mean we don't provide them with care during their problem period. The situation is a very good deterrent for others to say to themselves, maybe, I shouldn't behave in this fashion. Look at what he's gone through over the last year. A week behind the glass wall in a court, the abuse he takes from fans. The enormous toll this placed on his family. The enormous legal costs, the cost in terms of Chelsea discipline, in terms of FA discipline, it's an extraordinary cost. If you look at punishment and deterrent, I think it's pretty much been accomplished here. == ROMAN ABRAMOVICH == I've been dealing with him and his colleagues since about 1995 when he was a substantial owner of Sibneft. Mr Abramovich is a private person but he's very much a Chelsea fan and that part of his persona has definitely come through. The fans definitely know he's a fan and that's important. He wants to let the players do the talking on the pitch. He's not interested in being a public personality or invited to A-list functions. He's just a man of some wealth who loves football and loves Chelsea Football Club. He does speak English pretty well. All his children go to English schools and his current partner grew up in Los Angeles. There's English all round him 24/7. It is not true that, when he went into the Chelsea dressing room after we won the Champions League, he had an interpreter with him. == SOCIAL INITIATIVES == Mr Abramovich has spent millions on charity things. We have a Chelsea Foundation. We have a Past Players' Trust. All set up under Mr Abramovich. Last year we had 31 different programmes. We've got two senior executives, one of whom spends about half her time on corporate and social responsibility projects. In this country, it includes education, meals for the aged, football activities to keep kids off the street. And we have the Right to Play and Blue Pitches programmes in 15 countries. We have the slogan: here to play, here to stay. Chelsea are the only club ever to contribute financially to Vision Asia, Vision China and Vision India, individual marketelated projects where they would build pitches, working with governments or with football organisations. In round terms, we contribute three to four per cent of our gross income of ￡255million. == STADIUM PLANS == We're looking for a site close to Stamford Bridge and there are maybe three or four of those maximum. We could put a fantastic stadium at Battersea making use of the power station, which could be one of the most iconic stadiums in the world. We could put in an excellent stadium at Earls Court. But we don't have those sites. Expanding Stamford Bridge would be very expensive, wouldn't be very nice to look at and is not likely to be financially viable. We've thought about sharing with Queens Park Rangers or Fulham but we're not considering it because we know how unhappy our fans would be. Most fans — 99 per cent — accept we might have to leave but they don't want to move to Wormwood Scrubs or to Croydon. If we proposed something specific that made sense, the Chelsea Pitch Owners would support us. Battersea or Earls Court is likely to satisfy most fans. -- 以伊露維塔的名為證發誓 — 若有誰敢奪取屬於我們的藍色之心，不論對方是天使、惡魔、男人或女人，包括尚未出生者，若有任何的生靈，不論偉大或渺小，是善還是惡，我們都將懷著復仇與憎恨之心直追到天涯海角，直追到世界結束之日。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.43.139.93