[情報] 卻爾西將對英超財政公平投贊成票

看板Chelsea作者JamesCaesar (首席百人隊長)時間13年前 (2013/02/07 03:23)推噓10(10推 0噓 1→)

留言11則, 7人參與討論串1/1

http://sports.sina.com.cn/g/pl/2013-02-07/11056415691.shtml 2013年02月07日11:05 新浪體育本週四，英超20家俱樂部的主席們將召開關鍵性會議，對“英超財政公平競賽” 的實施方案進行表決投票，據英國媒體披露，切爾西的1票有可能成為決定性的因素。　　英國通訊社稱，切爾西此前被視為財政公平競賽方案的反對者，但藍軍這次卻將對一個妥協性方案投贊成票，該方案禁止英超俱樂部無節制的花錢，但卻允許老闆彌補部分虧空。　　這次投票表決的方案，將設立球員工資上浮上限(預計是10%)等措施，來控制英超球隊的財政支出，不過妥協之處在於，將允許老闆們在三年期裡覆蓋最多達1億零 500萬英鎊的虧空。對於這個妥協性方案，英超球隊的立場分為兩派，阿森納、曼聯、熱刺和利物浦呼籲不進行任何妥協，也就是不允許老闆掏錢填補任何虧空，將“財政公平競賽方案”做的更徹底；而曼城、富勒姆、西布朗和維拉，則預計會投票反對該財政公平競賽方案。　　不過，切爾西對妥協性方案的贊成票，將成為關鍵的1票，英通社稱，藍軍的1票將在20強中湊齊所需的14票，令該方案得到通過。也就是說，在英超豪門中，阿森納曼聯、熱刺、利物浦等傳統強勢隊伍都支持嚴格限制財政開銷(甚至聯名寫信要求不允許老闆掏錢填補球隊虧空)，而以曼城為首的新勢力反對財政限制，切爾西則支持一個折中的方案。　　而有關球員工資上浮上限的規定，也有特殊的約定，目前看來，妥協性方案中的這一條款，將只對工資總額達到5200萬英鎊的球隊有效，而不會影響從英冠升級的球隊來大幅加強陣容。 (蒂普戴爾) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11668/8476080/ Premier League chairmen set to vote at Thursday's fair play showdown meeting Last Updated: February 6, 2013 5:51pm Chelsea are set to back both a wage increase cap and a compromise financial fair play deal at Thursday's showdown meeting of all 20 Premier League chairmen, but Manchester City are one of four clubs ready to vote against plans. The Premier League executive need an agreement from 14 clubs to make changes to the rule and the backing of the Stamford Bridge club should enable the necessary amount of votes. Two proposals have been put forward - a long-term broad acceptance of UEFA's FFP break-even policy, and a shorter-term salary cap where clubs will be allowed only to increase wages per year. Manchester United's David Gill, Tottenham's Daniel Levy and Arsenal's Ivan Gazidis head those in favour of the long-term solution along UEFA lines while it is understood that Roman Abramovich's Blues will agree to a system that obliges clubs to break even but allows owners to cover some losses. It now looks likely that the cap will only affect those clubs whose total bill is higher than ￡52m so that promoted sides are not prevented from improving their squads. Furthermore, spending money earned from clubs' individual sponsorship deals on wages will not be restricted. That can be significant - in Manchester United's case commercial income totalled ￡117.6m last year and their wage bill ￡160m. Arsenal, United, Tottenham and Liverpool will still argue that wealthy owners should not be allowed to underwrite any losses, but in order to push FFP through will have to settle for a compromise, where up to ￡105million over three years can be covered in order to maintain the Premier League's competitiveness and its attraction to a global TV audience. Opponents of FFP argue that the system maintains the status quo and favours the biggest clubs with large stadia and high commercial income with Fulham, West Brom and Aston Villa joining City as they look set to vote against it. -- http://fanchants.com/football-songs/chelsea-chants/carefree/ Carefree, wherever we may be, We are the famous CFC！ And we don't give a fuck, whoever you may be, 'Cos we are the famous CFC... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 1.172.80.192