[情報] 俱樂部支持歐足聯和英超的財政公平政策
http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/3068368/
FINANCIAL RULES UPDATE
Posted on: Thu 07 Feb 2013
Premier League clubs today reached an agreement to introduce financial
stability rules and wage controls for the league. Chelsea Football Club is
supportive of moves that promote financial stability in football. We are
already subject to UEFA's Financial Fair Play principles and will comply
with those.
The new rules will be subject to further detailed discussions before they
are brought in and we will play our part in those to ensure implementation
is fair for all clubs in the league.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11668/8478278/
PL clubs facing points deduction if they breach new spending controls
Last Updated: February 8, 2013 9:47am
Premier League clubs will face a points deduction if they breach new
spending controls, chief executive Richard Scudamore has confirmed.
The 20 club chairmen agreed to two significant controls on Thursday - to
limit players' wage bills from next season and to longer-term measures
that will restrict the amount of losses clubs can make to ￡105million
over three years.
Clubs whose total wage bill is more than ￡52m will only be allowed to
increase their wages by ￡4m per season for the next three years, but the
cap does not cover extra money coming in from increases in commercial or
matchday income.
Scudamore said: "As all things in our rulebook you will subject to a
disciplinary commission. The clubs understand that if people break the
￡105m we will look for the top-end ultimate sanction range - a points
deduction.
"Normally we stay silent on sanctions as the commission has a free range
but clearly if there is a material breach of that rule we will be asking
the commission to consider top-end sanctions."
The vote for financial regulations could hardly have been closer, with
only 13 of the 20 clubs voting in favour, with six against and Reading
abstaining.
It meant that the 'yes' vote only narrowly achieved the necessary
two-thirds majority of the 19 votes cast. Clubs sources say Fulham, West
Brom, Manchester City, Aston Villa, Swansea and Southampton all voted
against.
Scudamore said there would be an "absolute prohibition" on clubs reporting
losses of more than ￡105m over the next three years with the first
sanctions possible in 2016.
Of the 20 clubs in the top flight, only Manchester City, Chelsea and
Liverpool have reported losses of more than ￡105m over the last three
years, according to the most up-to-date published accounts.
The regulations have come about against the backdrop of UEFA's Financial
Fair Play (FFP) initiative. Under UEFA's new rules clubs are being forced
to minimise losses or risk the possibility of exclusion from European
competition from 2014/15.
Scudamore admitted that their own FFP measures would mean it will take
longer for benefactor owners to achieve success, but that it would still
be possible.
He said: "The balance we have tried to strike is that a new owner can
still invest a decent amount of money to improve their club but they are
not going to be throwing hundreds and hundreds of millions in a very short
period of time.
"While it has worked for a couple of clubs in the last 10 years, and I am
not critical of that, if that's going to be done in the future it's going
to have to be over a slightly longer term without the huge losses being
made.
"I think at ￡105m you can still build a very decent club with substantial
owner funding but you have to do it over time, you can't do it in a
season."
Chelsea won the Premier League two years after Roman Abramovich's
takeover, and Manchester City's title success came three years after
Sheikh Mansour's takeover.
Any club making any loss of over ￡5m a year will have guarantee those
losses against the owner's assets.
"In some ways that's the most significant part; this is a three-year
rolling system of secure funding - it's one year at the moment," added
Scudamore.
The ceiling when the wage increase restrictions kick in will be ￡52m next
season, ￡56m the following year and ￡60m in 2015-16. Only seven of the
current top-flight clubs would be under that ceiling at the moment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2274957/
By Charles Sale - PUBLISHED:12:21 GMT, 7 February 2013
The Premier League's new financial rules
Q: Will the Premier League now have a salary cap?
A: Not in the strict sense of the word. Clubs whose total wage bill is
more than ￡52million will only be allowed to increase their wages by
￡4million per season for the next three years.
Q: So the likes of Manchester United are limited to a ￡4million a year
total wage increase?
A: Not quite - the restriction only applies to the income from TV money.
If clubs boost their income through extra sponsorship deals or matchday
income, they can spend that on wages too.
Q: What do the new financial fair play (FFP) rules mean and which clubs
will it effect?
A: These will put a ceiling on the amount of losses each club can make to
￡105million over three years, but these have to guaranteed by owners.
Q: How does that compare to UEFA's FFP rules?
A: UEFA's are more stringent - losses over three years are limited to
45million euros (￡39million).
Q: Which clubs fall foul of the ￡105million losses over three years
figure?
A: On the most recent figures, Manchester City, Chelsea, Liverpool and
Aston Villa have all reported higher losses than ￡105million, but the
trend is towards cutting losses and this will not apply until the three
years before 2016.
Q: If a club's official annual figures show losses of ￡110million, will
they automatically be in breach of the regulations?
A: Not necessarily - spending on academies, facilities and stadiums can be
offset.
Q: What will happen if a club is found guilty of breaching the salary and
spending regulations?
A: They are likely to have a points deduction.
Q: Has the final decision now been taken by the Premier League?
A: The principle of the regulations, and the figures involved, have been
agreed. They do still need to be ratified at a meeting in April
however.
Q: Is that just a rubber-stamping exercise?
A: It will probably go through - but the vote could not have been closer
with only 13 of the 19 votes cast in favour, just scraping past the
necessary two-thirds majority.
Q: Why did some clubs viewed as being well-run and not making losses vote
against the regulations?
A: Some of them believe the Premier League should be a free market, are
proud of the way they have run their clubs on a sustainable basis and
resent being told what to do.
--
當我漫遊在斯坦弗森林時，我看見了雀爾西，米爾斯的女兒，在傍晚初升的明月中，
在泰晤士河旁一處林地空間上翩然舞蹈。所有痛苦的記憶都離開了我，我像落入迷離
幻境中一般，因為雀爾西是伊露維塔兒女中最美的一位。她身上那襲藍色的衣裳宛如
萬里無雲的晴空，她灰色的眼睛像是傍晚群星閃爍的天空；她的斗篷上繡著金色的花
朵，她的頭髮漆黑如暮色中的陰影。她的榮光與美好，就像樹葉上的光芒，像是潺潺
流水，像是這迷離世界上方閃爍的繁星；她臉上有閃亮的光輝。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.39.150.88
Chelsea 近期熱門文章
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
66
141
39
72
40
78