Re: [交易反應] Colvin Stewart LeMahieu Weathers

看板Cubs作者 (Dorasaga)時間14年前 (2011/12/09 12:48), 編輯推噓5(508)
留言13則, 4人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
避免有人說我輕視自己的農場, 同一link裡發表以及研究更徹底的Tom球迷有 不同意見. 這我也他X滴同意: Sorry Cubtex, I work a late shift on Thursday and I just got back home. I stand by what I've reported about LeMahieu, that he has offensive skills and has the potential to contend for a batting championship. As for those who feel he has no speed, consider that he has batted either second or third in the line-up for nearly all of his professional career. Those are not spots that usually are free to run at will. When given a chance in the AFL, LeMahieu was second in the league with 14 stolen bases. As I've always reported, the problem that LeMahieu is defensive. He is agile, has quick hands, and a strong arm. However, at 6'4", he will very quickly out-grow a middle infield position. He is better suited for third or first. But considering most fans believe it to be carved in stone somewhere that those positions have to display 25+ home run power, he probably won't get many chances at those positions. Many fans forget Colvin's punctured lung at the end of the 2010 season. This injury set him back, as he was supposed to attend winter ball and concentrate on playing first base. Management panicked, and signed Carlos Pena instead, basically taking a position away from Colvin. The best thing they could have done was send him to Triple-A. However, they decided to use him in a reverse-platoon, catering to a veteran. Overall, this was a good scouting job by the Rockies. They acquire a younger, more athletic player than Seth Smith, whom Colvin will compete with for the starting position. They also get a better hitter in LeMahieu than two aging Oakland A's castoffs Kevin Kouzmanoff and Mark Ellis who he will vie to replace. All for two players the Rockies no longer had a use for. Not as bad on scale as last year's Garza trade, but the same concept. The Cubs didn't get equity in return for what they gave up. -- *~~*~~*~~*~~*~~* Chicago, Change. *~~*~~*~~*~~*~~* -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 112.105.139.180

12/09 12:52, , 1F
話說MLB版聊這新聞的推文真的很墮落...
12/09 12:52, 1F

12/09 12:57, , 2F
mlb版不要管了
12/09 12:57, 2F

12/09 20:00, , 3F
D.J. LeMahieu的守備金妮有看比賽就知道
12/09 20:00, 3F

12/09 20:01, , 4F
二壘的守備卡卡的 反而比較像是三壘的料
12/09 20:01, 4F

12/09 20:01, , 5F
但是長打能力實在太糟了 要站三壘打擊又不行
12/09 20:01, 5F

12/09 20:02, , 6F
這個交易令人詬病的還是Ian的約前落磯沒幫出錢
12/09 20:02, 6F

12/09 20:18, , 7F

12/10 08:32, , 8F
的確, 所以本文作者與其說"LeMahieu真得很好", 還不如說
12/10 08:32, 8F

12/10 08:33, , 9F
落磯把不要的球員換了小熊"還可以用"的球員
12/10 08:33, 9F

12/10 11:49, , 10F
洛磯打者都會在下山後的巔峰時期突然爛掉 Atkins, Hawpe
12/10 11:49, 10F

12/13 23:13, , 11F
板凳深度, 我個人寧願留LeMahieu, 單換Colvin<->Stewart
12/13 23:13, 11F

12/14 00:05, , 12F
這兩個單換洛磯應該不會給換
12/14 00:05, 12F

12/22 15:49, , 13F
Oh well. 不是只有Cubs FO才有智慧.
12/22 15:49, 13F
文章代碼(AID): #1EuPCQen (Cubs)
文章代碼(AID): #1EuPCQen (Cubs)