Re: E-Jax the next?

看板Diamondbacks作者時間15年前 (2010/07/27 16:19), 編輯推噓2(203)
留言5則, 4人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
※ 引述《mittermeyer (真的真的好想休息)》之銘言: : http://espn.go.com/mlb/notebook/_/id/5394903/countdown-trade-deadline : The Nationals continue to talk to Adam Dunn's agents about an extension and : have essentially made it clear that if they can get him to agree to an : extension in the next few days, he'll stay. And if not, he'll go. Rumblings : continue to surface about a possible three-team deal involving the Nationals, : White Sox and Diamondbacks that would send Edwin Jackson to Washington, Dunn : to Chicago and a bunch of young pitchers to Arizona. : == : 如果交易成真 : 薪資應該可以壓到45M : 前提是FO不要再腦殘去簽一堆奇怪FA... 有外國作家猜測會不會是 Dunn => CHW Jackson => WSN Dan Hudson => ARI 能這樣當然是最好,不過我覺得除非Mike Rizzo是我們派出去的間諜 否則他幹嘛送我們Dan Hudson拿比較貴的Jackson? 而且我看我們FO的腦大概也想不到提出Dan Hudson為主的包裹 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.25.133

07/27 16:20, , 1F
這交易成真第一個被罵的也不會是我們 而是WSH
07/27 16:20, 1F

07/27 17:55, , 2F
顆顆 成真的話代表有兩隊更腦殘的FO
07/27 17:55, 2F

07/27 18:07, , 3F
阿Ken本來就是無法猜透的GM 幾乎沒人知道他要幹嘛 XD
07/27 18:07, 3F

07/27 18:07, , 4F
Rizzo向來也有資源回收D'backs球員的習慣 所以有好戲
07/27 18:07, 4F

07/27 20:32, , 5F
Rizzo如果收Jackson也是賺,只是賺的不如收Hudson多
07/27 20:32, 5F
文章代碼(AID): #1CJfQ3my (Diamondbacks)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
1
2
以下文章回應了本文
1
1
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
1
1
2
5
1
2
文章代碼(AID): #1CJfQ3my (Diamondbacks)