[情報]MGP老闆們不贊同Brawn的車隊指令

看板FORMULA1 (F1 賽車)作者Gekiranger (獣拳は正義の拳)時間13年前 (2013/03/25 20:33)推噓23(23推 0噓 114→)

留言137則, 13人參與討論串1/1

來源: http://ppt.cc/Sku0 原出處: http://ppt.cc/_qae German faction sides against Brawn over Rosberg team order MGP老闆們不贊同Brawn的車隊指令 Mercedes' German-speaking faction has spoken out against the team orders that prevented Nico Rosberg from finishing on the podium in Malaysia. Mercedes陣中的德系人士對於不讓Rosberg超車的車隊指令表示了反對。 German Rosberg asked and asked again to be let past his new British teammate Lewis Hamilton on Sunday, who was saving fuel to the finish as he ran in third place.Team boss Ross Brawn answered repeatedly: "Negative." 在周日的比賽中，Rosberg一再詢問是否可以超過去，但都得到了車隊領隊Ross Brawn的否定回答。 (原文一直強調布朗爺跟李奧納多的國籍感覺超故意XD) Afterwards - but before Hamilton admitted on the podium that he was uncomfortable about finishing third - Rosberg told strategist Brawn on the radio to "Remember this one." 最終站在領獎臺上的Hamilton也並不感到舒服。而Rosberg賽後在TR中對Brawn說：記住這樣一件(事情).(其實所指為何連原譯文都沒翻出來) It was a saga not unnoticed by Mercedes' newly-arrived Austrian shareholders and bosses Niki Lauda and Toto Wolff, who were not amused. "From a sporting perspective, that was wrong," Lauda told German television RTL. "They should have let him (Rosberg) go. "We need to talk to Ross, if this is the strategy to be used from now on," he added. Wolff agreed: "From a sporting point of view, that's not what we want to see." 奧地利籍的非執行董事Niki Lauda與新老闆Toto Wolff都不同意這樣的舉動. Lauda對RTL表示：“從運動角度說，這是錯誤的。他們應該讓他過去。我們要跟Ross談談，看看是否這種策略從現在開始都要執行。" Toto Wolff也說：“從運動角度講，這不是我們想要看到的。” Brawn, whose role as team boss is believed threatened by the Austrian duo and also the likely arrival of McLaren's Paddy Lowe, is understood to have defended the 'team order' on the basis that Rosberg was also low on fuel. 官位受到奧地利人(顯然是指Lauda)與可能在未來面臨 McLaren車隊的Paddy Lowe競爭的 Brawn為車隊指令辯護說，兩位車手都要省油。 Rosberg denied: "I did not have to save fuel. Everything was alright. "I will sit down together with Ross to rethink whether this was really the right decision." 但是Rosberg否認了：“我沒有要省油，一切都很正常。我會跟Ross坐下來一起談談這是否是正確的決定。” The 27-year-old's rationale is that, with tyres in good shape and fuel in the tank, he might have been able to chase down the leading Red Bulls. According to Auto Motor und Sport, 1996 world champion Damon Hill agreed: "He might at least have been able to hurry the Red Bulls into a tyre problem." 而根據AMuS的報導，Damon Hill對此說：“Rosberg有可能讓紅牛陷入輪胎問題。” Rosberg added: "I don't know if I would have gotten the Red Bulls. But I felt good at the time. "I was doing well and would have liked to see how far I could have gone." Rosberg自己也說：“我不知道我是否能夠追上紅牛。但我當時感覺很好。我做的很好，也想要看看自己能走到多遠。” Justifying his anger on the radio, he explained: "I tried to get them to reconsider their decision." 關於自己在無線電廣播中表達的憤怒，他解釋說：“我想讓他們重新思考自己的決定。” But Rosberg denied Red Bull figure Dr Helmut Marko's claim that the episode demonstrates that Lewis Hamilton is Mercedes' obvious "number 1" driver. "I can understand how this (episode) creates that impression," Rosberg responded, "but I am sure that if I had been in front, the decision would have been the same." 但是Rosberg否認了紅牛的Marko博士稱Hamilton明顯是Mercedes一號車手的說法。 “我可以理解這件事情會產生那樣的印象。但我確信，如果我在前面的話，（對Hamilton的）決定也會是同樣的。” -- 1.這篇有無可能想戰國籍? 2.如果MGP的奧地利和英國勢力鬥爭為真搞不好布朗爺真的會被鬥走 3.請問一下板上先進大大為啥會叫Lauda"尚書大人"??? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 192.192.154.49

→

corlos

03/25 20:35, , 1^F

03/25 20:35, 1^F

→

corlos

03/25 20:35, , 2^F

03/25 20:35, 2^F

推

likeastar

03/25 20:40, , 3^F

03/25 20:40, 3^F