[轉錄] Bruce Levenson 想賣老鷹的真正動機

看板Hawks作者時間11年前 (2014/09/13 01:21), 11年前編輯推噓14(1405)
留言19則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
作者 kreen (大晴天。) 看板 Kreen 標題 Re: [NBA] Bruce Levenson 想賣老鷹的真正動機 時間 Fri Sep 12 22:20:22 2014 ─────────────────────────────────────── The Mess in Atlanta: What Bruce Levenson’s Email and Exit Mean for the Future of the Hawks http://es.pn/1wmnxga by Zach Lowe 導因: Bruce Levenson 在 2012 封館時歧視黑人球迷的 E-mail 被曝光,主因是他不想把票賣給窮的黑人,希望多想一點 方案吸引有錢的白人球迷。 老鷹的現實: 1.主場上座率過低,且 70% 都是黑人進場,戰績好的時 候上座率不到聯盟平均,戰機差的時候是聯盟倒數前三 名。 2.老鷹上季虧損 23.9M,在聯盟中虧第五多,僅次於籃網 、夏洛特黃蜂、灰狼、活塞。 Levenson 現況: 1.對黑人的看法 -黑人球迷不會像白人球迷一樣去買週邊商品 -黑人球迷比較少家庭客 所以他透過一些方法試圖降低黑人球迷的比例,像是減 少放饒舌音樂、讓白人球迷出現在鏡頭前之類的。 2.商業條件 -他是老鷹的實際控制者,不須其他人同意就可販賣 -快艇跟公鹿的高溢價讓人很有賣的理由。 買賣球隊現況: 1.聯盟接近跟 ESPN、Turner 達成轉播合約 聯盟自 2016-17後將收穫每年 20 億美元以上(現在每 年只有九億),經濟泡沫將更不會破滅,事實上相當多 買家對購買球隊感到興趣。 2.潛在買家可能把球隊搬離亞特蘭大 最著名的例子是 Chris Hansen 的西雅圖團隊,當初他 報價給國王的時候是 6 億 + 額外的 3億球場。現在他 們對老鷹也感到興趣。 - 本文還提到 Danny Ferry 對 Deng的歧視和老鷹產權爭議 ,我覺得那不是重點就不整理了,有興趣可以自己點進去 看。 ※ 引述《kreen (大晴天。)》之銘言: : What's Bruce Levenson's real motivation for selling : the Hawks? : http://bit.ly/1wbTJCW : by Chris Mannix : "I think you've got to be very, very careful when you start making blanket : statements about what people say and think, as opposed to what they do. It's : a very, very slippery slope." – Mark Cuban, last April. : Were the contents of Bruce Levenson’s email reprehensible? : Absolutely. : Should it have cost him his team? : Well… : By now you know the story: In the summer of 2012, Levenson, the majority : owner of the Atlanta Hawks, fired off an email to Hawks general manager Danny : Ferry and two of the team’s minority owners. In the email, which was : intended to address legitimate business issues, Levenson made a series of : ignorant, racially insensitive remarks. : He connected the team’s financial struggles directly to its largely black : fan base, suggesting, in as bizarre a way as possible, that the team should : strive to attract a larger white audience by incorporating more white : cheerleaders, by playing music that would appeal to “a 40-year old white guy : ” and by diversifying, of all things, the kiss-cam that scans the crowd : between quarters. : In July, Levenson, according to the NBA, handed the email over to league : officials. On Sunday, in carefully prepared joint statements, the league and : Levenson announced he would sell his stake in the team. : Now, there are a handful of unanswered questions. Did the NBA encourage — or : even order — Levenson to sell the team? His decision to do so certainly made : the league’s life a little easier. There is no clean way to boot an owner : with the stench of racism attached to him, but the orderly way the NBA and : Levenson made the announcement, an announcement conveniently dumped into the : middle of a day dominated by the start of the NFL season, certainly makes : things simpler. : Did Levenson want to sell the team? There is evidence of that, too. In 2011, : Levenson thought he had a deal to sell the Hawks to California businessman : Alex Meruelo, only to have negotiations fall apart at the 11th hour. The NBA : landscape has changed dramatically since then, with sales of the Milwaukee : Bucks ($550 million) and Los Angeles Clippers ($2 billion) sending franchise : values skyrocketing and the promise of a lucrative new television deal : serving as a carrot that has prospective owners tripping over themselves to : overbid. A team like the Hawks, which Forbes recently valued at $425 million, : could fetch double that. : “I think what happened was he saw how much teams were going for and wanted : to make some money,” a rival team executive said. “What he said was wrong : but to me it seems like an excuse to sell.” : But what if Levenson didn’t want to sell? Should the NBA have the right to : force him to? : Should anyone? : Levenson isn’t Donald Sterling. Sterling, the recently deposed Clippers : owner, had a documented history of racist, discriminatory behavior well : before his rant to a former mistress. Levenson has none. But make no mistake, : Levenson's fate is directly connected to Sterling. The NBA reacted swiftly to : racist comments made by Sterling, banning him for life and immediately : beginning the process that ultimately resulted in Sterling being stripped of : his team. Many owners were uncomfortable with such a harsh punishment, most : notably Cuban, who worried about setting this kind of precedent for comments : made in private. This is an example of why. : If Levenson had resisted selling his stake, things would have undoubtedly : become ugly. Some owners would support him, most players would have likely : lined up against him and the fan base that Levenson was so dismissive of : would have stayed away in droves. Sponsors would flee and the story would : pollute the Hawks season, sabotaging it from the start. Levenson, one of : Sterling's harshest critics, had to know there was no way he could survive : this, that in a post-Sterling world a racially charged email like that was a : death sentence for his ownership. : "If you're angry about what I wrote, you should be," Levenson said in a : statement. "I'm angry at myself, too. It was inflammatory nonsense. ... I'm : truly embarrassed by my words." : Banishing Sterling was the right thing to do, but the NBA opened Pandora’s : Box when it did. One comment, one email, one statement never meant to become : public can have catastrophic results. Levenson had an ugly skeleton buried in : his closet, a skeleton he had to know would eventually emerge. Across the : league, other NBA owners must be asking themselves the same question: Do I? -- ┌這篇文章讓您覺得?────────────────────────────┐ │ │ 一"一 \ / >\\\< ╯ ╰ ∩ ∩ ▁ ▁_< ㄧ ㄧ+ │ ε Δ ╰╯ 北七 亂喔 害羞 莎笅 爽啦 哭爸 XD 科科 └────────────────────────── http://kreen.org ───┘ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢兔(ptt2.cc), 來自: 220.134.106.87

09/12 23:09,
可以幫我貼or借轉老鷹板嗎?thx~
09/12 23:09

09/12 23:33,
你轉過去吧~
09/12 23:33
-- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.254.50.132 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Hawks/M.1410542492.A.98E.html ※ 編輯: JoshSmith (111.254.50.132), 09/13/2014 01:21:38

09/14 18:12, , 1F
老鷹真的是蠻怪的...位於亞特蘭大 感覺卻像大聯盟的光芒
09/14 18:12, 1F

09/14 18:14, , 2F
一樣沒人氣 而且話題討論度也真的很低
09/14 18:14, 2F

09/16 01:28, , 3F
Atlanta明明大城市不是? 同城勇士明明...
09/16 01:28, 3F

09/21 03:15, , 4F
就是這樣才納悶 不知道老鷹為何缺人氣...
09/21 03:15, 4F

10/13 09:51, , 5F
球隊一直不上不下 以及沒有一個高人氣的當家球星吧
10/13 09:51, 5F

10/13 09:53, , 6F
J.Johnson和J.Smith感覺都少了一點全明星的感覺
10/13 09:53, 6F

10/13 09:55, , 7F
不過我覺得老鷹老闆在唬爛 只是單純不賺錢想賣球隊
10/13 09:55, 7F

10/13 09:57, , 8F
不然球迷是黑是白根本沒那麼大的影響吧 努力增加上座率
10/13 09:57, 8F

10/13 09:57, , 9F
反而比較重要吧
10/13 09:57, 9F

10/17 00:15, , 10F
如果Webber真的買下 不知道未來會不會走的更遠?
10/17 00:15, 10F

10/17 00:17, , 11F
不過可以確定的是 絕對比現在好很多
10/17 00:17, 11F

10/17 21:37, , 12F
最近看了一下外國討論區,發現大家對 FERRY 離職、
10/17 21:37, 12F

10/17 21:38, , 13F
總教練 BUD 身兼 GM 一事滿期待的。好吧,希望是好事
10/17 21:38, 13F

10/17 21:38, , 14F
然後我記得 LEVENSON 其實是不錯的老闆,當年經營權
10/17 21:38, 14F

10/17 21:39, , 15F
大戰中,他也是反 BELKIN 的一員,曾經的球團老闆調查中
10/17 21:39, 15F

10/17 21:39, , 16F
他也是被評價為少數非常把球迷放在心上的老闆
10/17 21:39, 16F

10/17 21:40, , 17F
但既然他可能無心繼續經營,也是沒有辦法的事
10/17 21:40, 17F

10/29 02:23, , 18F
印象中沒錯的話 Belkin是不是當初反對Joe Johnson來?
10/29 02:23, 18F

10/29 02:26, , 19F
然後被其他股東趕走了
10/29 02:26, 19F
文章代碼(AID): #1K4okScE (Hawks)
文章代碼(AID): #1K4okScE (Hawks)