West Ham v Tottenham 賽後評分

看板Hotspur作者GoldSky (高爾多斯基)時間17年前 (2008/12/09 12:58)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)

SKY The Sun Setanta Heurelho Gomes 7 6 7.0 A superb double save late on helped Spurs seal the points. Jonathan Woodgate 7 6 6.5 An authoritative display in central defence to frustrate the Hammers. Benoit Assou-Ekotto 6 6 6.5 Was lucky to escape a handball inside the area. Vedran Corluka 6 6 7.0 Will have better games but did look bright going forward. Ledley King 8 8 8.0 Towering performance at the back and scored the crucial first goal. Didier Zokora 6 6 6.5 Battled hard all evening. Jermaine Jenas 6 6 7.5 Won his midfield duels with his opposite numbers. David Bentley 6 6 6.0 Too many wasted crosses into the box. Luka Modric 7 7 7.0 Always looked dangerous on the ball and constantly looked to create chances. Roman Pavlyuchenko 5 6 6.5 Fairly anonymous and missed an easy chance in the first half. Aaron Lennon 7 6 7.0 Set up King's goal with a delightful delivery into the area. Jamie O'Hara(Sub) 7 6 7.0 Scored a cracking goal worthy of any stage. Darren Bent(Sub) 6 6 6.5 Had a few opportunities but failed to take them. 長舌SKY又來了 XD Setanta,SKY的全場最佳都給King 我比較同意Setanta的給分 AE,Zokora,Jenas我覺得都應該給五分 AE逃過一個手球。Zokora在剛開賽的時候一直弄丟簡單的球。等Zokora恢復之後換Jenas一直弄丟簡單的球，而且他還有一些毛躁的犯規。我真的認為CM這個位置我們需要一個控制力更強的選手。 Bentley的評語對他有點不公平，雖然他真的有幾個球沒弄好。但是與其說他浪費傳中不如說在中間的沒有接應好。這場WHU選擇主攻Corluka，但是Corluka接連成功化解他們的攻勢。他的功勞很大。如果他們用Bellamy打AE我覺得會很危險。 Gomes也是今天的功臣之一。下半開始和O'Hara進球前他們有兩波很強的攻勢。兩波都成功擋住才帶出接下來的進球，要是他們在下半先進球我們會很難打。議員在上半場機會不多，達人上來之後有幾個進球機會。說議員表現不好我也不覺得，我想應該是下半場局面改變了。下半場我們丟簡單球的情況改善，換成他們一直丟簡單的球，因為這樣我們能加強進攻。上半場基本上兩邊勢均力敵。悲情王子是我覺得讓我們改變最多的球員。即使他很悲情，怎麼踢就是不會進球。他在場上和達人配議員最大的不同就是他自己能創造機會活絡進攻。有達人和議員這種標準target型的球員，4231是最適合我們的。 -- 如果本篇文章有造成任何的迫害請告知本人將自Ｄ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 121.92.65.136