Re: [轉播] 08/16 Indians vs. CWS

看板Indians作者時間14年前 (2011/08/18 12:13), 編輯推噓0(0011)
留言11則, 3人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
: → cascor:超多的 真是多到不行 除了二壘審之外 內野三個都很扯 08/17 13:09 : → cascor:一三壘是左右護法 08/17 13:10 我應該要收回這句話 內野殘判真是糟到一個極致 "So we've got one more fundamental play to work on during Spring Training. Any time a guy is on first and somebody hits a double toward right field, just tackle the runner at second base." -- Indians manager Manny Acta, joking about the obstruction play in the fourth inning of Tuesday's 8-7 loss to the White Sox. 昨天的狀況是 一壘有Brantley Choo打了一個鐵定是double的右飛 Brantley繞過二壘時 被Ramirez給"弄"倒了 Choo繞過一壘一大半見識不妙 馬上返回一壘 Brantley倒地後又爬了起來上三壘(還好中間轉傳沒處理好) 結果這個"妨礙守備" Choo只能停在一壘 看來明天我們應該把Duncan叫上來站游擊 古巴飛彈繞過二壘一樣把他給放倒好了~ 至於那個一壘審Wally Bell is a totally fxxxing axxhole. 賞了Sipp一個ejection... 最有趣的來了: ‧ Given the handful of controversial rulings throughout Tuesday's 8-7, 14-inning loss to the White Sox, Acta was asked for his thoughts on the umpiring crew of Laz Diaz, Wally Bell, John Hirschbeck and Scott Barry. "It's one of my favorite crews," Acta said on Wednesday. "Those guys are very good. They had a rough night last night." Acta大概知道現在在人家家裡 系列戰還沒打完 不能隨便亂放砲~ It was a great battle that we fought yesterday even we lost. It is a HUGE win that we kick their ass today! Go Tribe! Let's take series win! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 98.234.212.10

08/18 12:20, , 1F
這能不能向commissioner提申訴?像pine tar game那樣
08/18 12:20, 1F

08/18 12:20, , 2F
能夠重打是最好。
08/18 12:20, 2F

08/18 12:21, , 3F
還有,MLB到底有沒有針對不適任裁判的懲罰機制?
08/18 12:21, 3F

08/18 12:23, , 4F
我跟我同事討論了棒球的裁判 真的無法理解為什麼其他職業
08/18 12:23, 4F

08/18 12:23, , 5F
運動都可以靠電視來輔助人 唯獨棒球這麼抗拒
08/18 12:23, 5F

08/18 12:24, , 6F
老外也搞不懂 一定要把殘判也是比賽的一部分這個理論貫徹
08/18 12:24, 6F

08/18 12:24, , 7F
到底 真是厲害
08/18 12:24, 7F

08/18 12:31, , 8F
well...至少現在全壘打可以用重播輔助了...
08/18 12:31, 8F

08/18 12:31, , 9F
之前對紅襪那個系列,A咖有一右外野平飛的HR差點被紅襪主場
08/18 12:31, 9F

08/18 12:31, , 10F
的裁判給沒收,還好重播以後有還給我們...
08/18 12:31, 10F

08/18 12:32, , 11F
看到裁判看完重播出來以後舉起手劃圈圈感覺還滿爽的
08/18 12:32, 11F
文章代碼(AID): #1EJ95jQT (Indians)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
以下文章回應了本文
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1EJ95jQT (Indians)