[外絮] NBA否認了對林有不公正的吹判

看板Jeremy_Lin (林書豪)作者 (monkeytw)時間9年前 (2016/04/16 19:14), 編輯推噓29(29029)
留言58則, 29人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
http://tinyurl.com/jaaml47 紐約時報? 最近在背英文單字基礎不好有翻錯請指正 -------------------------------標題--------------------------------------- N.B.A. Denies Anti-Lin Bias on Fouls NBA否認了對林有不公正的吹判 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The N.B.A. issued a response on Friday to an article in The New York Times NBA回應了一個議題 星期五紐約時報報導的一篇文章 about a fan-made video that highlighted multiple forceful fouls on the Charlotte Hornets guard Jeremy Lin. 一位粉絲制作的高清無碼暴力犯規影片 受害者林書豪 The article first appeared online Thursday and centered on Hsiu-Chen Kuei, 48, of San Jose, Calif., whose video, 影片是在星期四出現 作者 Hsiu-Chen Kuei 48歲 居住於 聖荷西 加利福尼亞州 “Jeremy Lin: Too Flagrant Not to Call,” has been viewed on YouTube more than one million times. 片名 "林書豪:這麼暴力了裁判還不吹?" 在 YouTube 有了超過百萬次的點擊率 In the video, Kuei depicts several instances, in which Lin was the recipient of hard contact around his head and wonders why no flagrant fouls were called. 在影片中 Kuei 指出在多種情況下 對於林被各種強力打臉但卻沒得到惡意犯規哨非常驚 訝 “After reviewing our extensive officiating database, we have found no data that suggests Jeremy Lin is disadvantaged by our officiating staff,” "在重新檢視了我們眾多官方影片後 我們沒發現有任何指出林是被裁判歸類不吹惡意犯規 哨的弱勢球員" the N.B.A. wrote in a statement posted to its website. 以上聲明被貼在NBA的官方網站 The N.B.A.’s response to the video and article was based on leaguewide foul statistics. 官方回應是基於全聯盟的犯規統計 The league said that over the past three seasons, Lin ranked 21st among all players in total drives to the basket, with 1,537, 聯盟說在過去的三個球季 林在所有球員中切入籃下次數排名第21位 總計1537次 and that he had drawn the seventh-highest number of fouls among the 23 players who attempted more than 1,500 drives during those seasons. 在23位這三季切入籃下次數超過1500的球員裡他得到了排名第7多的犯規 “Furthermore,” the N.B.A. wrote, “given the infrequency of flagrant fouls (roughly 1 per every 500 foul calls), "此外" 吹惡意犯規的次數並不頻繁(大約500次犯規裡才會有一個惡意犯規) it is not statistically significant that none of Mr. Lin’s 814 fouls drawn were deemed flagrant. 這不是統計學但有意思的是林的814次被犯規裡沒有一次是惡意犯規 But Kuei was not as concerned about aggregate data or how Lin compared with leaguewide totals 但 Kuei 並不是很關心這些統計數字或是林在聯盟中對比其他球員得到犯規的數字 as she was about specific instances, in which opposing players were not penalized for delivering blows to his head 她關心的是在實際情形中對方球員在打臉林書豪後並沒有得到該有的懲罰 The N.B.A. reiterated that it did not believe any of the plays shown in the video — 官方重申不會覺得影片中這些球員的行為 which included hard hits on Lin from Kobe Bryant, Carmelo Anthony and James Harden, among others — were flagrant fouls. 包括打臉林的老大,甜瓜,鬍子還有其他球員--有惡意犯規 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.249.198.87 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Jeremy_Lin/M.1460805267.A.48A.html

04/16 19:17, , 1F
沒不公正 就選擇性沒看到
04/16 19:17, 1F

04/16 19:29, , 2F
我記得kuei有和紐約記者說她還有更多證明的片段,看之後NBA
04/16 19:29, 2F

04/16 19:29, , 3F
怎麼吹判再決定要不要剪出來!為何我有種想看好戲的fu~
04/16 19:29, 3F

04/16 19:29, , 4F
打頭沒有惡意 季後賽要使勁打了嗎
04/16 19:29, 4F

04/16 19:39, , 5F
能引起關注倒挺意外的
04/16 19:39, 5F

04/16 19:39, , 6F
我覺得這次季後賽反正不太有人敢下重手,畢竟現在在風頭上。
04/16 19:39, 6F

04/16 19:47, , 7F
這弄不好會引起暴動的
04/16 19:47, 7F

04/16 20:00, , 8F
在美國來說,種族問題其實很敏感,之前佛格森事件就很大
04/16 20:00, 8F

04/16 20:29, , 9F
很敏感沒錯,但是同樣的事還是重複發生
04/16 20:29, 9F

04/16 20:31, , 10F
怎麼可能承認
04/16 20:31, 10F

04/16 20:32, , 11F
這種東西死都不能承認 不然風波更大
04/16 20:32, 11F

04/16 20:42, , 12F
ESPN有個新的評論影片,球評都幫Lin贊聲
04/16 20:42, 12F

04/16 20:43, , 13F

04/16 20:46, , 14F
官方鬼扯一堆,直接回應影片中的是不是惡意犯規,為什麼
04/16 20:46, 14F

04/16 20:46, , 15F
沒吹判就好了,這種欲蓋彌彰的回應更顯得就是有問題在裡
04/16 20:46, 15F

04/16 20:46, , 16F
04/16 20:46, 16F

04/16 21:07, , 17F
我覺得官方會去回應,出乎我意料之外。畢竟原非正式申訴
04/16 21:07, 17F

04/16 21:32, , 18F
官方扯統計數量真的是此地無銀
04/16 21:32, 18F

04/16 21:32, , 19F
幹嘛不直接說影片裡的動作有沒有惡意犯規
04/16 21:32, 19F

04/16 21:32, , 20F
flagrant foul跟惡意不惡意不一定直接有關係,很明顯
04/16 21:32, 20F

04/16 21:34, , 21F
統計的數據建立在該吹判而沒吹的數字上
04/16 21:34, 21F

04/16 21:34, , 22F
標準就是不能打頸部以上(這容易造成很嚴重運動傷害或性
04/16 21:34, 22F

04/16 21:37, , 23F
命之虞),酸酸還扯甚麼只是Highlight,打頸部以上就是
04/16 21:37, 23F

04/16 21:37, , 24F
大林密Ido Amir超不爽的 還寫了判罰規則要他們自己看
04/16 21:37, 24F

04/16 21:38, , 25F
惡意犯規,還是Lin的頭不是頭?
04/16 21:38, 25F

04/16 21:46, , 26F
樓上說的好!
04/16 21:46, 26F

04/16 21:49, , 27F
Karl Lane 77號 對林的被犯規視而不見的裁判 可惜肉搜不
04/16 21:49, 27F

04/16 21:49, , 28F
04/16 21:49, 28F

04/16 21:57, , 29F
Bull shit
04/16 21:57, 29F

04/16 21:58, , 30F

04/16 21:58, , 31F
新影片再上吧!
04/16 21:58, 31F

04/16 21:58, , 32F
樓上說的77號裁判是這個嗎?Karl Lane
04/16 21:58, 32F

04/16 22:11, , 33F
一定不能承認 只能暗地裡修正或是摸頭吧
04/16 22:11, 33F

04/16 22:14, , 34F
突然感覺這事可能沒這麼快落幕。
04/16 22:14, 34F

04/16 22:34, , 35F
蝴蝶效應還是海嘯來了呢 潮水退了就知道
04/16 22:34, 35F

04/16 22:47, , 36F
of course they would deny...
04/16 22:47, 36F

04/16 22:51, , 37F
放心吧 等季後賽開打 新聞又會被蓋過去 大家也會漸漸遺
04/16 22:51, 37F

04/16 22:51, , 38F
忘此事
04/16 22:51, 38F

04/16 23:04, , 39F
樓上顯然不知到美國今年選舉XD
04/16 23:04, 39F

04/16 23:14, , 40F
??
04/16 23:14, 40F

04/16 23:31, , 41F
04/16 23:31, 41F

04/16 23:48, , 42F
以WWE跟NFL的水準,這種程度還不構成犯規沒錯啊! (咦?)
04/16 23:48, 42F

04/17 01:34, , 43F
我的NBA腹黑揣測,我讓林得到他應該及不應該得到的遭犯規
04/17 01:34, 43F

04/17 01:34, , 44F
吹判,但給隊友少一點吹判,然後第一輪就讓你黃蜂早早出
04/17 01:34, 44F

04/17 01:34, , 45F
局,因為這樣最省麻煩,不會有人繼續吵
04/17 01:34, 45F

04/17 03:45, , 46F
他這樣子反而更多爭議
04/17 03:45, 46F

04/17 08:05, , 47F
美國種族議題很敏感的 他現在有回應但回應不漂亮 還只
04/17 08:05, 47F

04/17 08:05, , 48F
是推特 如果有下一波很懷疑會鬧多大 摸著良心講 美國
04/17 08:05, 48F

04/17 08:05, , 49F
佬還是會擔心16億人對他們吐口水的
04/17 08:05, 49F

04/17 11:20, , 50F
在美國扯到種族議題是一種放大絕的方式
04/17 11:20, 50F

04/17 11:21, , 51F
美國本身就是移民為主的國家,沒必要討論「存不存在」
04/17 11:21, 51F

04/17 11:22, , 52F
美國一直都有努力在營造「族群和諧」的現象
04/17 11:22, 52F

04/17 11:23, , 53F
但現實是,NBA亞裔就少,當然先天體能上也許沒辦法
04/17 11:23, 53F

04/17 11:24, , 54F
另一個很重要的,裁判,亞裔呢?
04/17 11:24, 54F

04/17 11:25, , 55F
所以真的要講公平,還有很長一段路要走,反正話題炒熱
04/17 11:25, 55F

04/17 11:26, , 56F
之後「應該」動作不會那麼大那麼明顯,應該會合理點
04/17 11:26, 56F

04/17 11:26, , 57F
至於要他們「承認」他們的確對LIN不公正,我認為蠻難
04/17 11:26, 57F

06/20 00:11, , 58F
廢到笑 趕快退一退拉
06/20 00:11, 58F
文章代碼(AID): #1N4XwJIA (Jeremy_Lin)
文章代碼(AID): #1N4XwJIA (Jeremy_Lin)