Re: [情報] Motiejunas close to signing Nets offer

看板Jeremy_Lin (林書豪)作者 (fuzzy)時間9年前 (2016/12/03 12:15), 9年前編輯推噓27(27022)
留言49則, 27人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
恕刪... 原文:https://goo.gl/FeOPBx 翻重點… The offer sheet has Motiejunas earning $5 million upon the signing of the contract, and the team has to decide by Jan. 10 whether to pay him another $3.5 million for the remainder of the 2016-17 season, league sources said. 簽下這份合約已經先幫DMO賺了5M,球隊要在1/10前決定是否要付他剩下球季的3.5M。 By March 1, the team has to pick up the option for $9 million owed to Motiejunas for the 2017-18 season, sources said. 3/1前,球隊必須要執行2017-18球季要付給DMO的9M選項。 The final two years of the contract are non-guaranteed, league sources said, which means the team can cut Motiejunas loose without paying the balance of the contract. Before the 2018-19 and 2019-20 seasons, there’s a July 7 trigger date to make a decision on Motiejunas’ deal. Each of the four years includes $1 million in likely bonuses, and $500,000 in unlikely bonuses, sources said. 後兩年是非保證合約,這代表球隊能夠不用付合約的其他金額就能裁掉DMO。2018-19和 2019-20球季前,有個7/7觸發日期,必須決定是否要執行合約。四年合約每年都包含1M的 可能性獎金,和0.5M的困難性獎金。 The Nets delivered the offer sheet electronically to the Rockets on Friday night, and Houston has until midnight Tuesday to match the offer sheet and retain Motiejunas. 期限是周二午夜12:00 Concerns over recurring back issues – which included surgery to repair a ruptured disk in 2015 – impacted the interest NBA teams had in signing Motiejunas, 26, to an offer sheet over the summer. DMO是2015年做了背部椎間盤破裂修復手術… If acquired, Nets general manager Sean Marks and coach Kenny Atkinson view Motiejunas as a power forward playing beside center Brook Lopez. 馬克和阿金認為DMO能和肉配汁搭配打大前鋒 _______________________________________________________________________ 補充籃網迷的分析 https://goo.gl/info/RekOJv 挑幾段重點簡單翻... Then, on March 1, the Nets (or the Rockets if they match) have a team option on year two of his deal. According to most reports, his team whoever it is will then have to commit another $9 million, making the two-year deal worth $18 million. Under the CBA, the matching team cannot trade him at all this season; cannot trade him without his permission for 12 months, cannot trade him to the Nets for 12 months, period 3/1前不管哪隊得到DMO,都有球隊選項決定是否執行第二年9M的合約,前兩年合約價值合 計18M。根據CBA規定,匹配合約的母隊本季不能交易DMO,12個月內沒有本人同意不能交易 他,12個月內不能將他交易到籃網。 ****** At first glance, it would appear that this is a no-brainer for Daryl Morey, who low-balled Motiejunas this summer with a two-year deal starting at $7 million but guaranteed for only one year. Now, that the market has spoken, in the form of the Nets and Sean Marks, it’s an easy decision to match and move on. Right? 乍看之下對莫雷來說根本想都不用想就能匹配…真是這樣嗎? Not so fast. The money is one thing, but the Rockets are, as Kevin Pelton describes them, “obsessive” about having flexibility. This deal might seem flexible, but it makes little sense for Houston to dump Motiejunas before the summer. They either want him or they don’t. As Pelton writes, if they go along with the offer sheet, and commit to his second year on March 1, Motiejunas sucks up all their projected cap space for the 2017 free agency. 沒那麼簡單。錢是一回事,但就像Kevin Pelton這樣形容火箭,他們很執著於薪資彈性這 件事。這張合約貌似很有彈性,但若是匹配下去,3/1前執行第二年選項,DMO會佔光他們 預期留給2017年自由市場的薪資空間。 They could, of course, just hang on to him for this season, but if they decide against giving him a commitment for year two, he becomes a free agent on July 1. The Nets can step in and sign him during the summer. Brooklyn has just set his market price and he and agent B.J. Armstrong now have a relationship with Marks, Prokhorov, et al. As Motiejunas has said, he appreciated that the Nets approached him, adding that their medical evaluation of his back is comforting 當然他們本季可以留下他,但若是他們拒絕執行第二年選項,DMO在7/1就會變成自由球員 。籃網能在夏天簽下他。籃網已經幫DMO訂下市場價值,DMO和經紀人B.J. Armstrong 已和籃網建立交情。如DMO所說他感謝籃網接觸他,加上籃網對他的背部評估令他欣慰。 ******** For the Nets, this appears to be a move without much downside, almost risk-free. Motiejunas is a good player, not a savior, but they’d be adding a 26-year-old with deft passing skills, terrific post moves, solid three point shooting and reasonable defense. His arrival and that of Caris LeVert would dramatically improve the bench. If, as one would assume, Motiejunas starts next to Brook Lopez, Trevor Booker would return to his natural role as a firebrand off the bench. LeVert would help as well. 就籃網來說,開出這張合約沒什麼損失.幾乎零風險的一步。DMO是好球員,不是救世主, 但他的傳球技巧,超棒的低位腳步,不錯的三分投射和合理的防守能增加戰力。他和 LeVert能大幅提高板凳實力。或者他搭配肉配汁先發,書人也能回到板凳帶動火力。 And that first year money? It’s basically free. The Nets are $9.2 million below the CBA salary floor, meaning they HAVE to pay out that $9.2 million either in salary or if they don’t spend it, in bonuses to the roster players as of April 14, the last day of the regular season. Better to use it, not lose it. 那麼第一年的薪資呢? 基本上是免費的。籃網目前還低於CBA規定薪資下限9.2M,如果不 花這筆錢,在本季正規賽季最後一天4/14也要分給當時的球員作為獎金。 If after a month, the Nets don’t like what they see, or have concerns about his back, they can wave goodbye to him (and $5 million) on January 10. Then, assuming they keep him, they have seven more weeks to evaluate him before March 1, when they have to make a decision on year two. 若是一個月後,籃網不喜歡DMO表現,或擔心他的背傷,他們可以在1/10跟他(和保障薪資 5M)說再見。若是要留下DMO,在3/1前還有7週能觀察他,再做決定是否要執行第二年選項 。 ****** 這合約一點都不毒...(菸) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.143.66.154 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Jeremy_Lin/M.1480738527.A.737.html

12/03 12:18, , 1F
疑 所以是Booker要打替補?
12/03 12:18, 1F

12/03 12:24, , 2F
booker有辦法打SF嗎 感覺RHJ的防守也沒想像中那麼好
12/03 12:24, 2F

12/03 12:28, , 3F
DMO防守是個問號... 但看起來是搶不到啦@@
12/03 12:28, 3F

12/03 12:29, , 4F
這是一個有沒有搶到都沒關係的合約吧
12/03 12:29, 4F

12/03 12:32, , 5F
感覺是助人行善合約+自助湊薪資下限兩相宜XD
12/03 12:32, 5F

12/03 12:35, , 6F
籃網的先發替補其實不是很有差
12/03 12:35, 6F

12/03 12:36, , 7F
上場時間大家都是片段片段的組合
12/03 12:36, 7F

12/03 13:25, , 8F
同樣k大說的,阿金教練的調度下根本無差別
12/03 13:25, 8F

12/03 14:10, , 9F
所以籃板誰搶…
12/03 14:10, 9F

12/03 14:15, , 10F
籃板大家搶
12/03 14:15, 10F

12/03 14:18, , 11F
Lin:搶籃板是後衛的工作(搶)
12/03 14:18, 11F

12/03 15:08, , 12F
大羅:三分是鋒線的工作(投)
12/03 15:08, 12F

12/03 15:12, , 13F
他現在就能馬上上場嗎?
12/03 15:12, 13F

12/03 15:25, , 14F
RHJ真的沒預期的好,投籃防守都蠻糟糕的
12/03 15:25, 14F

12/03 15:29, , 15F
RHJ理論上應該從替補打起,但就是沒人啊…
12/03 15:29, 15F

12/03 16:24, , 16F
ESPN分析:火箭如果跟了,d-mo的第二年會讓火箭沒彈性在
12/03 16:24, 16F

12/03 16:24, , 17F
自由市場上找人,這也就是為什麼火箭之前一直不肯給d-mo
12/03 16:24, 17F

12/03 16:24, , 18F
希望要的兩年保障約
12/03 16:24, 18F

12/03 16:26, , 19F
如果D-Mo還是當年火箭時期的身手 我覺得大有可為
12/03 16:26, 19F

12/03 16:26, , 20F
他跟Lin搭的時候也蠻強的 不過都幾年了 還要看看
12/03 16:26, 20F

12/03 16:38, , 21F
默契什的可以在練身手不是問題 健康才是關注點
12/03 16:38, 21F

12/03 16:42, , 22F
現在籃網不僅開了二年保障約還多加了一二五萬
12/03 16:42, 22F

12/03 16:44, , 23F
老莫 會甘心自己吃虧 被D MO佔便宜嗎XDD
12/03 16:44, 23F

12/03 16:44, , 24F
以老莫 處事風格來說
12/03 16:44, 24F

12/03 16:46, , 25F
更何況還有傷情疑慮 和以後火箭想追逐其它球星來看
12/03 16:46, 25F

12/03 16:59, , 26F
DMO偶爾能扛一下C,也算是減輕4 5號的壓力
12/03 16:59, 26F

12/03 22:24, , 27F
DMO主要還算年輕,扛C,PF都OK,進攻方面沒問題,防守都一樣
12/03 22:24, 27F

12/03 23:06, , 28F
這樣會把誰裁掉?
12/03 23:06, 28F

12/03 23:26, , 29F
可是我網後場比較殘說
12/03 23:26, 29F

12/03 23:34, , 30F
可以簽個後場先嗎…有點慘
12/03 23:34, 30F

12/03 23:35, , 31F
前面還有囧丸頂著^^
12/03 23:35, 31F

12/03 23:39, , 32F
可以丟佛爺的話 我也想丟.. 太毒了 乾脆練殺派
12/03 23:39, 32F

12/04 01:08, , 33F
加上傷病疑慮的話,火箭應該不會跟
12/04 01:08, 33F

12/04 02:09, , 34F
和大洛搭配 也沒有一定就要Booker打替補吧
12/04 02:09, 34F

12/04 02:10, , 35F
功能性蠻不一樣的2人
12/04 02:10, 35F

12/04 07:08, , 36F
只要健康 搭配默契都可以磨
12/04 07:08, 36F

12/04 09:03, , 37F
Lopez被交易機率變大了 不可能容許對上兩大長人都痛痛人
12/04 09:03, 37F

12/04 09:04, , 38F
資歷只是大肉薪水看起來交易價值沒想像中大
12/04 09:04, 38F

12/04 09:26, , 39F
假設今天籃網想交易大羅,用D-MO那開給D-MO的約就不可能
12/04 09:26, 39F

12/04 09:27, , 40F
是今天這份,交易大羅這件事除非是總管確定能換到好東西
12/04 09:27, 40F

12/04 09:28, , 41F
就看有沒有價值吧 籃網得忍耐這兩年的陣痛期
12/04 09:28, 41F

12/04 09:28, , 42F
不然以籃網現在沒人想來的狀況,交易大羅後續更難處理
12/04 09:28, 42F

12/04 09:35, , 43F
不太可能交易出去 沒什麼人要來了 可用之兵多一個是一個
12/04 09:35, 43F

12/04 09:40, , 44F
其實也沒那麼容易能交易出去 對籃網狀況來說沒什麼差別吧
12/04 09:40, 44F
※ 編輯: brownhusky (36.237.17.17), 12/04/2016 11:29:24

12/04 11:02, , 45F
大羅傷病問題會讓買家卻步;否則沒設保護的首輪*2 籃網鐵換
12/04 11:02, 45F

12/04 15:11, , 46F
勇士或騎士首輪x2 應該也不值多少吧
12/04 15:11, 46F

12/06 08:08, , 47F
火箭跟了…
12/06 08:08, 47F

12/07 03:45, , 48F
結果換DMo在火箭上演劇場了, 拒體檢...
12/07 03:45, 48F

12/07 13:01, , 49F
長人都不想留火__嗎?
12/07 13:01, 49F
文章代碼(AID): #1OGaRVSt (Jeremy_Lin)
文章代碼(AID): #1OGaRVSt (Jeremy_Lin)