[轉錄][外電] Gerald Green is where possessi …

看板Kings (沙加緬度 國王)作者 (新阿泰)時間17年前 (2009/02/21 11:53), 編輯推噓4(4017)
留言21則, 5人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 Mavericks 看板] 作者: popstarkirby (POP先生) 看板: Mavericks 標題: [外電] Gerald Green is where possessions go to die 時間: Sat Feb 21 07:01:48 2009 http://tinyurl.com/agb26v The primary reason that Gerald Green, who was cut by his hometown Rockets last season, rarely gets off the bench despite his jaw-dropping athleticism and sweet jumper is that he doesn't play a lick of defense. But that's not the only reason. Green has the ability to score in bunches, especially in the open court, but he's not a good halfcourt offensive player. He struggles to create his own shot, but that doesn't stop him from trying. And that makes him one of the NBA's biggest black holes. Basketball-statistics.com provides evidence with this study, which I found on The Two-Man Game. It's another one of those complicated formula deals, but there's a simple list for folks like me who took the bare minimum of math in college. And Gerald Green is ranked as the league's second-biggest black hole. There are some good players on the list -- Josh Howard is No. 5 -- but it's never a good thing to be considered a black hole. Especially when you're scrapping for every second of playing time you can get. Green被列入 聯盟第二大黑洞.... 教練不用他的理由 跟我想的一樣 就是"進攻流暢度" 雖然看了那麼多比賽 是覺得還好 依照Carlisle這種思維 Stackhouse不久後大概又要被冰... Josh Howard是第五大黑洞 黑洞定義 http://basketball-statistics.com/whosablackholeinthenba.html Player Pos USG% TS% AST% BHI Rashad McCants Wing 25.94 0.474 8.31 71.41 Gerald Green Wing 26.65 0.513 7.89 69.38 Al Thornton Wing 23.02 0.493 7.22 66.52 Rudy Gay Wing 26.33 0.521 8.53 62.16 Josh Howard Wing 26.15 0.526 8.70 59.37 Travis Outlaw Wing 21.72 0.537 6.70 57.11 Michael Beasley Big 28.41 0.508 6.55 56.37 Leandro Barbosa PG 24.20 0.586 13.71 50.70 Corey Maggette Wing 24.94 0.579 8.61 46.67 Marreese Speights Big 22.58 0.573 5.02 45.47 其他知名黑洞 Rk Player Pos USG% TS% AST% BHI 29 Nate Robinson PG 23.95 0.541 20.88 27.67 32 Kevin Martin Wing 27.72 0.594 12.04 25.44 42 Eddie House Wing 20.81 0.582 10.44 15.99 43 Ronald Murray Wing 23.52 0.548 12.94 14.27 47 Danny Granger Wing 29.10 0.580 15.55 4.53 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.45.169.120

02/21 11:51,
這篇借轉國王可以嗎 XD
02/21 11:51

02/21 11:52,
02/21 11:52
-- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.224.35.105

02/21 11:53, , 1F
我們被點名了 兩隻黑洞..........
02/21 11:53, 1F

02/21 11:54, , 2F
所以KM跟RMC決不能同時上場 會死人的.......
02/21 11:54, 2F

02/21 11:59, , 3F
他是用公式算出來,我沒仔細看就是
02/21 11:59, 3F

02/21 12:31, , 4F
我還是不太懂黑洞的真正意思耶 可以白話一點嗎?
02/21 12:31, 4F

02/21 12:40, , 5F
黏球吧 傳到他那就很難傳出來了
02/21 12:40, 5F

02/21 12:43, , 6F
作者的定義是拿球後就投 不傳隊友 然後低命中率
02/21 12:43, 6F

02/21 12:45, , 7F
RMC會是第一名一點都不意外 他就是那種拿到球就幹了
02/21 12:45, 7F

02/21 12:46, , 8F
KM的工作就是Finisher 所以還算ok
02/21 12:46, 8F

02/21 12:47, , 9F
所以RMC的問題不小 典型的有天份 但能不能轉換是個問題
02/21 12:47, 9F

02/21 12:56, , 10F
我看了一下網頁 蠻質疑的......
02/21 12:56, 10F

02/21 12:57, , 11F
他這樣算我覺得不夠精確 首先 不是助攻少就是黑洞
02/21 12:57, 11F

02/21 12:57, , 12F
當然如果RMC的進攻選擇好一點 不要太黏球 那就還好
02/21 12:57, 12F

02/21 12:57, , 13F
很多上榜的都是球隊的FINISHER 還有
02/21 12:57, 13F

02/21 13:02, , 14F
所以如果不是Finisher又上榜 就真的...獨獨獨
02/21 13:02, 14F

02/21 13:05, , 15F
TS%的帶入也很怪 照這樣算每個人都用五成多%去除?
02/21 13:05, 15F

02/21 13:23, , 16F
他的命中率公式標準 後衛 0.553 搖擺人 0.541
02/21 13:23, 16F

02/21 13:24, , 17F
中鋒 0.553 挖靠 這太嚴了吧.......
02/21 13:24, 17F

02/21 13:25, , 18F
講錯後衛是 0.533 這樣真的算的出黑洞 @@?
02/21 13:25, 18F

02/21 13:39, , 19F
總之我覺得不準 有同好可以一起來研究一下
02/21 13:39, 19F

02/21 13:39, , 20F
不過這也給我們個警訊 知道RMC的風格是如何
02/21 13:39, 20F

02/21 13:40, , 21F
在他的使用上要加倍謹慎 免得阻礙KM也害的團隊
02/21 13:40, 21F
文章代碼(AID): #19dtgo-n (Kings)
文章代碼(AID): #19dtgo-n (Kings)