[外電] The Problems With Ekpe Udoh

看板Kings (沙加緬度國王)作者eliczone (C'est la vie)時間15年前 (2010/05/20 11:01)推噓43(43推 0噓 135→)

留言178則, 15人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)

http://www.sactownroyalty.com/2010/5/19/1479223/the-problems-with-ekpe-udoh see several fans jumping aboard the Ekpe Udoh bandwagon as the Kings' superdupersleeper pick. It's quite clever, and I don't mean that in a dismissive or condescending way. Clearly, multiple fans think Udoh could be in play at No. 5, despite his status as a low lottery prospect on most boards. This, to me, indicates that several fans find this to be a keen idea. 有很多球迷都想要選Ekpe Udoh，這將會是完全沒有人猜得到的。這相當聰明，真的，我沒有輕視的意思。很明顯的，很多球迷認識Udoh可能值得第五順位，儘管他在大部分的預測是低樂透球員。 I'm not on board. 我並不這麼認為。 Problem #1: No one ever spells his name right. It's Ekpe, not Epke and certainly not Eppie's. 第一個問題：沒有人將他的名字拼對。是Ekpe，不是Epke更不是Eppie Problem #2: He's not a defensive rebounder. Udoh rebounded 17.9 percent of defensive opportunities, per KenPom.com. Baylor was 169th in the nation in defensive rebounding, so there were certainly available opportunities Udoh nor a teammate grabbed. (I mention that because if a player has mediocre rebound rates but the team ranks highly, there could be an issue of a teammate or two deflating said player's rebound totals.) Just about every big man pegged for the first round outrebounded Udoh on defense. A number of small forwards did, as well. It's not just that this team needs defensive rebounding. It's that the team can't really afford to add a player to the frontcourt rotation who cannot rebound on defense effectively. 問題2:他不是個會搶防守籃板的人。Udoh平均只有17.9%的防守機會搶得到籃板，排名第169名。所以常常Udoh和隊友都搶不到籃板(我提這個是因為如果一個球員沒有漂亮的數字，卻待在一支排名很高的球隊，有可能是因為隊友壓縮到他的空間)，幾乎第一輪的大個在防守籃板都巴掉他，一些SF也是。並不只是這支球隊需要防守籃板，而是這支球隊無法負擔增加一名無法有效率搶籃板的前場(Spencer No Rebound Hawes:我先搶到位置了) Problem #3: His offense is suspect. If he were an all-world defender in the making -- he can block shots extremely well, but again, he's not a strong defensive rebounder -- you can work on that. See: Derrick Favors. But Udoh had poor efficiency numbers at Baylor, despite not shooting nearly as much as other big man prospects. Favors is considered to be extremely raw on offense. Yet he shot about as frequently as Udoh at a much higher efficiency with more less talented guards setting him up. I know this isn't a choice between Favors and Udoh. But listen to what they say about Favors, and understand he's more developed on offense than Udoh, while also being bigger, a better rebounder and potentially a better defender. 問題3:他的進攻令人懷疑。他是個出名的防守者，他很會搧鍋，但再說一次，他不是個很會搶防守籃板的人。你可以努力，看看Favors。但Udoh的效率很差，和其他的大個子還有一段距離。Favors被認為在進攻方面非常稚嫩，但他的投籃效率比Udoh好上不少，更何況和他搭配的是沒什麼天份的後衛。我知道這不是要從Favors和Udoh之中選一個。但聽看看他們怎麼說Favors的，而且他比Udoh在進攻方面更有發展空間，而且更巨大，更棒的籃板手和防守球員。 Problem #4: Udoh's best skill is shotblocking, something the Kings could certainly. His second best skill is offensive rebounding. Udoh is unlikely to be much better than Jason Thompson at the pro level in that category (and probably not as good as likely returnee Jon Brockman). Other than that, Udoh isn't or doesn't project to be much better than any current Kings big man in any category. He can shoot from the mid-range, but so can Thompson and Carl Landry. He can play in the post, but so can Landry. He can pass, but so can Spencer Hawes. 問題4:Udoh最棒的是搧鍋，國王也許需要。他第二棒的是進攻籃板。Udoh不太可能在職業層級贏過小湯(而且可能連洛克人都比他好)。除了那個，Udoh在那方面也沒有比任何一位現役國王大個還要好。他可以投中距離，但小湯和洗衣店也可以。他可以低位單打，但洗衣店也可以。他會傳球，但Spencer Nice Pass Hawes也會。 Udoh needs to be a plus-plus-defender to justify the No. 5 spot, and I have trouble figuring out how you determine that in the workout process with one real season of college ball to look at. Udoh要成為第五順位必須要是一位超棒的防守者，而我還真不知道你如何在測試的時候認為只有打過一年大學籃球的他會是這樣的人。 -- -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.130.141.241

推

Kshatri

05/20 11:21, , 1^F

05/20 11:21, 1^F

推