Fw: [外絮] 對湖人來說,聰明的交易一定是最好的交易?
※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板 #1FNkRo6Y ]
作者: taylorliao (Page) 看板: NBA
標題: [外絮] 對湖人來說,聰明的交易一定是最好的交易?
時間: Tue Mar 13 14:19:27 2012
Source：Yahoo!Sports
By Kelly Dwyer | Ball Don't Lie
For the Lakers, the smart trade might not always be the best trade
Minds could change, and Houston Rockets point man Kyle Lowry might become a Los
Angeles Laker, if the two teams decide to sign off on revisiting last
December's deal that could put Pau Gasol in a Houston Rocket uniform. The
transaction would presumably also send big forward Luis Scola to Los Angeles.
Boston Celtics All-Star Rajon Rondo could become a Los Angeles Laker, if the
team decides to part with Gasol, as well. Both options would presumably work
wonders for Los Angeles, gifting them a needed creator at a position that isn't
ably being filled by Derek Fisher and Steve Blake at the moment. And though
Gasol's all-around work would be missed, adding a player like Scola would ease
in the transition.
想法可能會改變，而休士頓火箭隊的關鍵先生 Kyle Lowry 或許會成為洛杉磯湖人隊的一員
，如果這兩隊決定像去年12月時一樣重新坐下來達成協議的話，那麼 Pau Gasol 將會穿上
休士頓火箭的球衣出賽。這個異動據推測火箭方面也將把大前鋒 Luis Scola 打包送到洛杉
磯去。而波士頓賽爾提克的全明星後衛 Rajon Rondo 也是可能成為湖人隊員的人選之一，
如果湖人方面也決定還是與 Gasol 分道揚鑣的話。這兩個選擇不管怎麼選對湖人來說應該
都是挺靠譜的，在Derek Fisher和Steve Blake無法有效地當勝任1號位這個位置的情況下，
得到了他們亟欲需要的控球後衛。然而雖然這個決定將使球隊可能失去如Gasol般全能的貢
獻，但找來像Scola這樣的球員來填補，應該會減輕一些損失。
Despite the nouveau Laker front office's desire to depart with Gasol, though,
it wouldn't appear to make much of a difference. Because in spite of the team's
newfound willingness to put the ball in Andrew Bynum's hands down the stretch
of close games, this offense wouldn't appear to take to on-paper improvements.
The ball is still going to be going to Kobe Bryant for long stretches, and the
team would still need a lights-out shooter more than anything at the point
guard position.
儘管湖人新的制服組很想把Gasol給交易出去，然而，這還是不會有什麼太大的改變。因為
不管球隊在上一場比賽到了最後關鍵時刻時(95-94湖人領先老賽1分時)，找到了新招主動提
出把球交給Andrew Bynum的手上也把最後勝負關鍵交給了他(Kobe在賽後說這是他的決定而
不是總教練Mike Brown的要求)，但那次的進攻策略並不代表實際上的改善。主導球的人依
然會長時間地在Kobe Bryant手中，而球隊將還是需要一位關鍵時刻殺手(clutch player)
勝過任何在控球後衛上的需求。
It's a lovely luxury to have, if Los Angeles would just own up and realize it.
如果湖人願意就承認並且認清這一點，這是一個甜蜜的負擔。
Taking down a brittle Boston Celtics team at home, even coming off the end of a
tough road trip (that first game back is always the toughest) shouldn't be
thought of as a major step forward for these Lakers. But it could be a start,
especially with the Los Angeles Clippers fading in the Pacific standings. The
team has just three days left to avoid making a deal; even if (on paper) adding
a borderline All-Star (this year, at least) in Lowry and an 85 percent
approximation of Gasol in Scola would help the team immeasurably.
在主場擊敗老弱的波士頓賽爾提克，就算才結束艱困的客場之旅(3/6 @DET、3/7 @WAS、3/9
@MIN)，應該也不會想到湖人隊在想法上會有這麼大的突破。但這可能只是一個開始，尤其
是當洛杉磯快艇在太平洋組的排名逐漸下滑的情況之下(進入3月後快艇戰績3W4L)。而湖人
距離交易截止日期只剩下3天的時間；就算找來勉強算的上是All-Star的Lowry(至少今年是)
和擁有幾乎Pau Gasol 8成5功力的Scola或許在戰力上也能帶給湖人無法預料的正面能量。
That's on paper. Scola would still be asked to do the things that Gasol is
often forced into, like shooting pick and pop jumpers as if he was Carlos
Boozer or Kevin Garnett. Gasol (and Scola) don't have that sort of perimeter
talent, despite the occasional outside flush. These are players that need the
ball, and in a Kobe-centric offense, they're not going to get the ball.
在理論上。Scola應該還會被要求做一些Gasol被迫要做工作，像是撿子彈或是跳投就好像他
是Carlos Boozer或是Kevin Garnett的功用一樣。Gasol(和Scola)並沒有那種天賦，雖然偶
爾也會在外線神來一筆(Gasol今年投進3顆3分球)。適合像這種球員的打法是需要有球在他
們手中，而在以Kobe為進攻核心的系統裡，他們將拿不到球。
The same goes for Lowry, and especially Rondo. Adding a penetrator and creator
at that position would seem to be the right tonic when you add up the
Efficiency Ratings and look at things from an "anything's better than
Fisher"-angle, but in practice I'm having a hard time seeing this work. Let's
say Lakers coach Mike Brown hands the keys to Lowry or Rondo, let's them
dribble into the paint endlessly and find whoever's open. This makes Kobe
Bryant (shooting 28 percent on 3-pointers this year) your spot-up shooter?
You're asking the bigs to finish with baseline jumpers?
情況對Lowry來說是一樣的，尤其當我們講的是Rondo的時候。在控球後衛這個位置上找來
具有切入能力和創造隊友機會，而且當你找來的是一個在EFF排行榜上更有效率而且在任何
角度比較起來不管怎麼看都是「完勝老漁」的後衛時，看起來都會是一個正確的決策，但回
到現實的時候我陷入了深思。打個比方來說， 湖人的總教練Mike Brown把球交給了Lowry或
是Rondo，讓他們不斷地運球切入禁區裡面，然後再找到空檔把球傳出去。用這種打法把
Kobe Bryant(本季在3分線上的命中率是28%)當作定點射手來用？要求大個子們在底線跳投ꄊ
These are players that need to dominate the ball, and that's not a knock on
Lowry or Rondo. This is just how they function, and how (not why) they put up
those fantastic numbers. Adding that to the Lakers takes away Kobe Bryant's
ability to dominate the ball, or the chance of dumping the ball into Gasol down
low, just to see what he can create.
適合這種球員的打法是讓他們主導球權，不是故意要挑剔Lowry或是Rondo。這只是他們的功
能，而也就是這樣的打法讓他們在助攻數據上繳出亮眼的成績單(Lowry平均本季7.2次、
Rondo則是10次)。找來這樣的球員與Kobe Bryant主導球的能力相互牴觸，或是失去Gasol在
低位拿到球時，他在低位的影響力。
Worse, it means giving up on something that could lead the Lakers to another
title. Despite the presence of Fisher and Blake. Despite Mike Brown's up and
down coaching.
更糟的是，這意味著湖人將放棄球隊可能贏得另一座冠軍的希望。儘管有Fisher和Blake的
存在。儘管Mike Brown搖擺不定的執教方式。
Kobe Bryant just isn't going to work with another creator. That's not some
side-stepped way of telling you that Kobe is selfish, rather, that's just a
function of his position. Kobe ain't Ray Allen or Kevin Martin, ready to roll
off a dozen screens and go up for the jumper. He's an all-around destroyer of
worlds, and you don't take away that ability just because you're able to trade
for someone that contributes more than Fisher and Blake, or because you think
dumping that big, softy, mopey (7-footer with incredible skill, and low-post
anchor on two championship teams) in Gasol is worth it just to do something at
the trade deadline.
Kobe Bryant 只是無法與其他需要長時間持球的playmaker一起搭配。而不是拐彎抹角地跟
你說Kobe是個自私的球員，更確切地說，那只是他在球場上的能發揮的功用。Kobe不是Ray-
Allen或是Kevin Martin，在擋拆戰術中找到絕佳地出手空檔並直接投射。他是在這個世界
上一位具有全面性破壞力的球員，而不能因噎廢食地只因為可以透過交易找到一個比起
Fisher或是Blake更有貢獻的球員而捨棄了這種能力，或是只因為你覺得要拋售高大、打球
很軟、看起來意志消沉(身高7呎並有著不可思議的技巧，而且在球隊拿下2次總冠軍時還是
球隊在低位最有力的支柱)的Gasol，趁他還有交易價值時在交易大限前做一些改變。
Los Angeles shouldn't pull the trigger because they can. This is a team that
needs to look in house and realize what it has. A top-heavy unit, sure, but one
that can succeed in a Western Conference that is looking more and more takeable
by the day.
洛杉磯方面不應該只因為他們可以交易而為交易。這是一個需要關起門來認真檢視，並去了
解球隊到底擁有什麼。當然，現在球隊不是很穩定， 但是他們是有能力闖過西區冠軍賽，
且隨著賽程進行看起來也正越來越步入正軌。
This isn't to pump up Fisher and Blake. The team is getting just 11 points,
seven assists and 37 percent shooting in 50 damn minutes of per-game play from
these two, to say nothing of the dodgy defense. We're not here to tell you
about some intangible factor that these two exude, enough to keep you from
dealing for a player like Lowry or Rondo.
這不是要把Fisher和Blake的臉打腫充胖子。他們兩位平均每場比賽只為球隊貢獻11分(Fish
-er：5.7pts；Blake：5.6pts)、7次助攻(Fisher：3.4asts；Blake：3.5asts)和37%的投籃
命中率(Fisher：38.3%；Blake：37.1%)，這還不包括他們慘不忍睹的防守。我們不是要告
訴你因為他們倆還有在數據上看不見的幫助，所以值得留下他們而捨棄找來像是Lowry或是
Rondo的球員。
And this isn't to tell you that everything is going swell in El Lay. This is a
team that has won 25 games through what is usually half of an NBA season. You
do the math. The Lakers don't do 50 wins. They do 60.
而這也不是要告訴你說LA(El Lay的讀音 = LA，與Lao-Da異曲同工)將會發生什麼改變。
這支球隊在半個球季已經贏了25場比賽。你也學過算數，湖人不會拿下50勝，他們會拿下60
勝。(這裡說的是以82場例行賽來看的話吧)
At least they should. And if the ball is moving from the inside-out, with
Bynum, Bryant and Pau Gasol taking on equal offensive shares, then this will be
a borderline unguardable team. This core is championship-worthy. It's only up
to the core, and the executives that can break it up, to realize that.
至少他們應該要拿下才對。而如果湖人在進攻中以Bynum、Bryant和Gasol為主打inside-out
，讓這3個人在平均分配球並讓球流動的話，那麼這支球隊將幾乎是守不住的。用這個核心
組合的湖人隊稱得上是具有爭奪總冠軍實力的球隊。關鍵只是在於這3個人身上，能不能夠
好好執行分工合作，並認清這一點而已。
Metta World Piece：where the fxxk am I？
2011-12 Hollinger NBA Player Statistics - Point Guards
RANK PLAYERS PER
1 Chris Paul 26.88
2 Derrick Rose 25.09
3 Russell Westbrook 23.64
4 Tony Parker 22.04
5 Lou Williams 21.86
6 Steve Nash 21.75
7 Stephen Curry 21.62
8 Deron Williams 21.55
9 Kyrie Irving 21.43
10 Jeremy Lin 20.78
11 Kyle Lowey 19.57
17 Rajon Rondo 18.8
53 Steve Blake 8.99
54 Derek Fisher 8.82
來源：http://ppt.cc/AcAM
心得：剩3天了...
--
Only The Strong Survive
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.220.50.74
※ 編輯: taylorliao 來自: 61.220.50.74 (03/13 14:20)
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: douglasyeh (112.105.133.221), 時間: 03/13/2012 14:26:53
推
03/13 14:27, , 1F
03/13 14:27, 1F
→
03/13 14:28, , 2F
03/13 14:28, 2F
→
03/13 14:28, , 3F
03/13 14:28, 3F
→
03/13 14:28, , 4F
03/13 14:28, 4F
→
03/13 14:29, , 5F
03/13 14:29, 5F
→
03/13 14:29, , 6F
03/13 14:29, 6F
→
03/13 14:29, , 7F
03/13 14:29, 7F
→
03/13 14:30, , 8F
03/13 14:30, 8F
→
03/13 14:30, , 9F
03/13 14:30, 9F
→
03/13 14:30, , 10F
03/13 14:30, 10F
推
03/13 14:30, , 11F
03/13 14:30, 11F
→
03/13 14:32, , 12F
03/13 14:32, 12F
→
03/13 14:32, , 13F
03/13 14:32, 13F
推
03/13 14:34, , 14F
03/13 14:34, 14F
推
03/13 14:34, , 15F
03/13 14:34, 15F
推
03/13 14:34, , 16F
03/13 14:34, 16F
→
03/13 14:35, , 17F
03/13 14:35, 17F
推
03/13 14:35, , 18F
03/13 14:35, 18F
※ 編輯: douglasyeh 來自: 112.105.133.221 (03/13 14:37)
→
03/13 14:36, , 19F
03/13 14:36, 19F
推
03/13 14:48, , 20F
03/13 14:48, 20F
→
03/13 14:48, , 21F
03/13 14:48, 21F
推
03/13 14:49, , 22F
03/13 14:49, 22F
→
03/13 14:50, , 23F
03/13 14:50, 23F
→
03/13 14:50, , 24F
03/13 14:50, 24F
→
03/13 14:51, , 25F
03/13 14:51, 25F
→
03/13 14:51, , 26F
03/13 14:51, 26F
推
03/13 14:51, , 27F
03/13 14:51, 27F
→
03/13 14:53, , 28F
03/13 14:53, 28F
推
03/13 14:54, , 29F
03/13 14:54, 29F
→
03/13 14:55, , 30F
03/13 14:55, 30F
→
03/13 14:56, , 31F
03/13 14:56, 31F
推
03/13 14:58, , 32F
03/13 14:58, 32F
推
03/13 15:00, , 33F
03/13 15:00, 33F
→
03/13 15:00, , 34F
03/13 15:00, 34F
→
03/13 15:00, , 35F
03/13 15:00, 35F
→
03/13 15:02, , 36F
03/13 15:02, 36F
推
03/13 15:02, , 37F
03/13 15:02, 37F
→
03/13 15:02, , 38F
03/13 15:02, 38F
推
03/13 15:04, , 39F
03/13 15:04, 39F
→
03/13 15:04, , 40F
03/13 15:04, 40F
推
03/13 15:04, , 41F
03/13 15:04, 41F
→
03/13 15:05, , 42F
03/13 15:05, 42F
→
03/13 15:05, , 43F
03/13 15:05, 43F
→
03/13 15:07, , 44F
03/13 15:07, 44F
→
03/13 15:08, , 45F
03/13 15:08, 45F
推
03/13 15:09, , 46F
03/13 15:09, 46F
→
03/13 15:09, , 47F
03/13 15:09, 47F
→
03/13 15:10, , 48F
03/13 15:10, 48F
→
03/13 15:11, , 49F
03/13 15:11, 49F
推
03/13 15:11, , 50F
03/13 15:11, 50F
推
03/13 15:12, , 51F
03/13 15:12, 51F
推
03/13 15:21, , 52F
03/13 15:21, 52F
推
03/13 15:34, , 53F
03/13 15:34, 53F
推
03/13 15:41, , 54F
03/13 15:41, 54F
推
03/13 15:51, , 55F
03/13 15:51, 55F
推
03/13 16:03, , 56F
03/13 16:03, 56F
→
03/13 16:03, , 57F
03/13 16:03, 57F
推
03/13 16:18, , 58F
03/13 16:18, 58F
推
03/13 16:19, , 59F
03/13 16:19, 59F
→
03/13 16:20, , 60F
03/13 16:20, 60F
→
03/13 16:21, , 61F
03/13 16:21, 61F
推
03/13 16:24, , 62F
03/13 16:24, 62F
→
03/13 16:33, , 63F
03/13 16:33, 63F
推
03/13 16:44, , 64F
03/13 16:44, 64F
推
03/13 16:46, , 65F
03/13 16:46, 65F
推
03/13 16:50, , 66F
03/13 16:50, 66F
推
03/13 17:04, , 67F
03/13 17:04, 67F
推
03/13 17:04, , 68F
03/13 17:04, 68F
→
03/13 17:05, , 69F
03/13 17:05, 69F
推
03/13 17:10, , 70F
03/13 17:10, 70F
推
03/13 17:15, , 71F
03/13 17:15, 71F
→
03/13 17:16, , 72F
03/13 17:16, 72F
推
03/13 17:46, , 73F
03/13 17:46, 73F
推
03/13 17:48, , 74F
03/13 17:48, 74F
推
03/13 17:48, , 75F
03/13 17:48, 75F
推
03/13 17:51, , 76F
03/13 17:51, 76F
推
03/13 18:22, , 77F
03/13 18:22, 77F
推
03/13 18:24, , 78F
03/13 18:24, 78F
→
03/13 18:24, , 79F
03/13 18:24, 79F
→
03/13 18:26, , 80F
03/13 18:26, 80F
→
03/13 18:26, , 81F
03/13 18:26, 81F
→
03/13 18:33, , 82F
03/13 18:33, 82F
→
03/13 18:35, , 83F
03/13 18:35, 83F
→
03/13 18:37, , 84F
03/13 18:37, 84F
推
03/13 21:55, , 85F
03/13 21:55, 85F
→
03/13 22:09, , 86F
03/13 22:09, 86F
→
09/11 06:02, , 87F
09/11 06:02, 87F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇)：
Lakers 近期熱門文章
101
322
388
1491
182
535
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
-15
36