Re: [情報] Dodgers Shopping Andre Ethier

看板MLB (美國職棒/大聯盟)作者時間13年前 (2012/12/20 11:52), 編輯推噓43(43030)
留言73則, 54人參與, 最新討論串3/3 (看更多)
※ 引述《beckseaton (沒有運動會死)》之銘言: : Source: Dodgers shopping Andre Ethier. If they deal him, they could be in the : mix for Nick Swisher. : https://twitter.com/FeinsandNYDN/status/281037634464251907 : 竟然要兜售Andre Ethier了 . 如果交易掉要追Nick Swisher? 道奇的計畫: http://tinyurl.com/bq9zbbd For all the money the Dodgers have spent, they still don't have a leadoff hitter. Why not Michael Bourn? You could come up with a few reasons why not, starting with the point that the Dodgers already have three outfielders they're committed to paying a combined $54.6 million in 2013. But sources familiar with the discussions say the Dodgers have at least talked about the idea of trading Andre Ethier and signing Bourn to replace him. Bourn would play center field, with Matt Kemp moving to right field. 把Ethier賣掉 kemp改守右外野 簽下Bourn守中外野 這樣一來道奇就有了Bourn當開路先鋒 (三個外野也都是金手套) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.109.64.173

12/20 11:52, , 1F
...................................
12/20 11:52, 1F

12/20 11:53, , 2F
說真的........有必要嗎...............
12/20 11:53, 2F

12/20 11:53, , 3F
不愧是Colletti
12/20 11:53, 3F

12/20 11:53, , 4F
....啊?
12/20 11:53, 4F

12/20 11:53, , 5F
又不是沒錢,直接簽下來啊(誤)
12/20 11:53, 5F

12/20 11:54, , 6F
請問 CC要守哪裡? 20M的替補OF?
12/20 11:54, 6F

12/20 11:55, , 7F
Ethier太便宜了, 賣掉很奇怪嗎?
12/20 11:55, 7F

12/20 11:55, , 8F
科科提 乾脆說3個15M 還比較有說服力
12/20 11:55, 8F

12/20 11:55, , 9F
原來CC只是簽A剛跟貝基特的利息,不算球員
12/20 11:55, 9F

12/20 11:55, , 10F
@@a..推樓上...突然無言..
12/20 11:55, 10F

12/20 11:56, , 11F
為什麼…=.=?
12/20 11:56, 11F

12/20 11:57, , 12F
.....................
12/20 11:57, 12F

12/20 11:57, , 13F
說好的不再補強 結果......
12/20 11:57, 13F

12/20 11:58, , 14F
別這樣傷害躲人迷的情感吧,好歹是自家的
12/20 11:58, 14F

12/20 11:59, , 15F
因為這不是補強,是補弱
12/20 11:59, 15F

12/20 12:00, , 16F
CC: 原來我不是leadoff的料 (看起來道奇一樣不期待他)
12/20 12:00, 16F

12/20 12:00, , 17F
科科提:除非有好康送上來 又挖到石油囉
12/20 12:00, 17F

12/20 12:01, , 18F
XDDDDDDDDDD 靠北 朝30M邁進
12/20 12:01, 18F

12/20 12:02, , 19F
300M
12/20 12:02, 19F

12/20 12:02, , 20F
錢太多不花掉很痛苦
12/20 12:02, 20F

12/20 12:03, , 21F
CC 06年以後就很少開路了
12/20 12:03, 21F

12/20 12:05, , 22F
Ethier:6 yrs/$95.95M (12-17) & 18 vesting option
12/20 12:05, 22F

12/20 12:05, , 23F
Bourn:Bora$
12/20 12:05, 23F

12/20 12:06, , 24F
科科提:我錢還有點多
12/20 12:06, 24F

12/20 12:06, , 25F
球迷:科科提哩賣鉤波囉 科科題:是要我買下賣鉤波?
12/20 12:06, 25F

12/20 12:06, , 26F
CC:老子明明在NYY過爽爽 怎麼老有人冒用我名號XDD
12/20 12:06, 26F

12/20 12:09, , 27F
再把Swisher簽下來 去守三壘 還蠻強的
12/20 12:09, 27F

12/20 12:11, , 28F
Swisher守三壘?= =
12/20 12:11, 28F

12/20 12:27, , 29F
吃一半錢送來光芒讓Ethier跟Loney相聚吧 (招手
12/20 12:27, 29F

12/20 12:29, , 30F
Ethier這麼貴..
12/20 12:29, 30F

12/20 12:32, , 31F
爽喔!Bourn的價值很可能被道奇炒高XD
12/20 12:32, 31F

12/20 12:35, , 32F
交易Ethier 再去買Bourn 好像沒什麼意義 看板球星耶....
12/20 12:35, 32F

12/20 12:41, , 33F
http://tinyurl.com/ycwvr97 這才是道奇的看板
12/20 12:41, 33F

12/20 12:43, , 34F
簽下來當4.5號OF
12/20 12:43, 34F

12/20 12:46, , 35F
OPS0.8的打者就不能當leadoff嗎 ..囧
12/20 12:46, 35F

12/20 12:48, , 36F
可以用Ethier去交易ss或3B...
12/20 12:48, 36F

12/20 12:53, , 37F
洋基:我這裡有個明星三壘手,要嗎?
12/20 12:53, 37F

12/20 12:58, , 38F
洋基:A-Rod 紅襪:Lackey
12/20 12:58, 38F

12/20 13:00, , 39F
這太智缺了
12/20 13:00, 39F

12/20 13:01, , 40F
正常人果然看不懂這邏輯
12/20 13:01, 40F

12/20 13:01, , 41F
神經病關電視。
12/20 13:01, 41F

12/20 13:02, , 42F
我實在是猜不透你阿 顆顆提
12/20 13:02, 42F

12/20 13:23, , 43F
科科提的思考領域果然與眾不同...
12/20 13:23, 43F

12/20 13:41, , 44F
怎麼點進去看意思不一樣?說沒有這回事!是我英文不好嗎
12/20 13:41, 44F

12/20 13:47, , 45F
作者後來有重新編輯過文章了吧
12/20 13:47, 45F

12/20 14:06, , 46F
這樣LF要擺CC嗎
12/20 14:06, 46F

12/20 14:19, , 47F
道奇的老闆是 美國聯邦銀行嗎 ....
12/20 14:19, 47F

12/20 14:34, , 48F
SP人太多 不先解決
12/20 14:34, 48F

12/20 14:41, , 49F
這個思考根本荒謬XD 除了錢太多無其他解
12/20 14:41, 49F

12/20 15:48, , 50F
仔細想想,這完全是玩電動的思維阿....
12/20 15:48, 50F

12/20 16:24, , 51F
果然沒猜錯會買誰 XDDDDDDDD
12/20 16:24, 51F

12/20 17:40, , 52F
都有CC了簽什麼Bourn啊,Ethiwr再怎樣保持健康的話砲管也
12/20 17:40, 52F

12/20 17:41, , 53F
Ethier
12/20 17:41, 53F

12/20 17:42, , 54F
大得多
12/20 17:42, 54F

12/20 17:42, , 55F
真正的洞在內野,一直開挖外野是怎樣..
12/20 17:42, 55F

12/20 17:49, , 56F
因為剩下的FA內野都不夠貴
12/20 17:49, 56F

12/20 18:05, , 57F
洋基:想要我的黃金內野嘛?
12/20 18:05, 57F

12/20 19:52, , 58F
就算錢太多也先補內野吧 一直補其他地方...
12/20 19:52, 58F

12/20 20:25, , 59F
買下Hamilton 再交易Ethier 不是更好嗎
12/20 20:25, 59F

12/20 20:29, , 60F
不愧是顆顆提 我看道奇這幾年要拿WS根本不可能
12/20 20:29, 60F

12/20 20:51, , 61F
為什麼是KEMP移防不是BOURN移防阿
12/20 20:51, 61F

12/20 21:01, , 62F
Bourn的防守比Kemp好上一截 當然是他站CF
12/20 21:01, 62F

12/20 21:15, , 63F
好上一截!?
12/20 21:15, 63F

12/20 21:16, , 64F
是有強迫症嗎? 我得了一種錢不花玩會死的病 XD
12/20 21:16, 64F

12/20 22:13, , 65F
Bourn防守有沒有比Kemp好上一截我不知道 但我肯定Kemp打擊
12/20 22:13, 65F

12/20 22:14, , 66F
電爆Bourn XD
12/20 22:14, 66F

12/20 23:19, , 67F
是不知道外野只能擺3個人嗎??
12/20 23:19, 67F

12/21 02:37, , 68F
Kemp的dWAR蠻慘的,沒看過很多躲人比賽但據說判斷有
12/21 02:37, 68F

12/21 02:38, , 69F
問題XD,不過明明有CC這種守備卻要追一個燒男是怎樣
12/21 02:38, 69F

12/21 02:40, , 70F
去年印象很深的一球是Kemp沒判斷好落點讓球掉在他
12/21 02:40, 70F

12/21 02:41, , 71F
後面,跑者衝三壘結果被他的雷射肩給抓到XD
12/21 02:41, 71F

12/21 12:10, , 72F
Kemp靠腿和臂力cover的 他飛球判斷根本只靠野性的直覺...
12/21 12:10, 72F

12/21 12:28, , 73F
野獸KEMP!!!
12/21 12:28, 73F
文章代碼(AID): #1GqejpIB (MLB)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1GqejpIB (MLB)