[爆炸頭報新聞] 賽後記者會

看板ManUtd作者krobenb (靠杯)時間12年前 (2013/09/23 03:10)推噓10(10推 0噓 6→)

留言16則, 10人參與討論串1/1

More Yes賽後訪談 ★ "We didn't play well; they were better. They started much stronger and much quicker than us.But we'll get better it's a long season to go. We'll put this behind us and move on. 我們踢得不好他們更加出色從一開始就比我們更加強硬和快速但是我們會變更好的! 這是個漫長的賽季我們得忘了這場比賽並且繼續前進!! ★ "I thought Manchester City were very good. We weren't, but City started the game really well. We really could have done with coming in at half -time 1-0, losing the second goal just before half-time changes it a little bit. Nevertheless, they came out strong again in the second half. 我認為City真的表現得非常好而我們卻不是。 City從一開賽就表現得不錯我們原本應該可以維持0:1結束上半場的比賽失去第二球改變了這一點然而，他們下半場的表現也很強硬 ★ "I think they got a grip of the game very early on, and we didn't. We never really got to grips with their midfield players in the early part of the game. Because of that, they started to get domination. We had to be stronger, but we weren't. But geat credit to the lads that they kept going, kept working away and got a goal back.Whatever manager loses the game, you try and win the next one - nothing changes." 我認為他們很早就掌握了比賽而我們沒有。在比賽的前段時間裡我們沒有真正的限制住他們的中場球員就因為如此他們很快就統治了比賽我們需要更強勢的表現來扭轉局面但是我們沒有做到我只能繼續信任小夥子們繼續努力繼續進攻最後追回了一球。這場輸了球下一場你就該嘗試或贏下一場比賽 - 一切都沒變 ★ "I would say Wayne Rooney's performance today was outstanding. He certainly didn't deserve to be on the losing team. he was first class." 我想說魯尼今天的表現是出色的他的表現不值得配上輸掉的球隊他是頂級的 ★ "We did say it was a difficult start, didn't we? I said at the time, the way the balls came out of the Premier League bag, I was't convinced... and I'm still not." 我從一開始就說過這是個艱難的開局不是嗎? 他們告訴我英超的賽程是隨機的但這很難令我相信我至今仍這樣覺得。最後我想說 More Yes是簽6年的合約不是6個月吧﹏﹏﹏﹏那我們的耐心是不是也該以"年"為單位而不是"場"呢 ↗ ＼ / @ @ \ 我很喜歡叫Moyes "More Yes " │★ @ @ │ __________ │ ∩＿＿ ∩ │一開始只是無聊現在我才想到 ﹨ ﹨ │ / \　/ ˋ| │ ﹨ ﹨ \ |⊙ ⊙ ˋ_/ 他是否需要得到球迷更多的支持更多的肯定呢? ﹨ 爆炸頭 ﹨ ≡(_●_ )@ |_ ﹨ ﹨ ||∪| __ / Of course , More YES!!!!!! ﹨__________﹨^^3 c^^^> ) ﹨﹨ ￣￣￣前進，曼聯!!!!!!!! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.193.61.55

推

SHOKE

09/23 03:25, , 1^F

09/23 03:25, 1^F

→

SHOKE

09/23 03:25, , 2^F

09/23 03:25, 2^F

→

SHOKE

09/23 03:26, , 3^F

09/23 03:26, 3^F