[NFL!] Brett Favre rule?

看板NFL (國家美式橄欖球聯盟)作者 (距離太遠 思念太近)時間16年前 (2010/03/02 05:22), 編輯推噓7(702)
留言9則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/1
說這樣有點諷刺 (or subjective), 但是 NFL 有意要考慮改變規則, 有關於延長賽: 1. If the team that receives the ball first scores a touchdown, the game is over. 2. If the team that receives the ball first scores a field goal, then the other team would receive a chance to score. If that team doesn't score, they lose. If they get a touchdown, they win. If they kick a field goal, the game continues in sudden death format. 3. The rules would only apply for postseason games. 這個改變, 當然是看到了 NFC 冠軍賽, Favre & Vikes 在完全沒有拿到球的情形下, 在延長賽輸球. * 小見..如果純粹為了改規則, 為何不改成和大學一樣, 只不過必須要 kickoff 呢? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 69.141.44.192

03/02 05:48, , 1F
我也覺得大學的延長賽規則比較合理
03/02 05:48, 1F

03/02 08:05, , 2F
那一球都沒拿到就贏的呢XD(例如今年ARZ那場)
03/02 08:05, 2F

03/02 08:06, , 3F
我是說Warner連上場都沒有就贏了
03/02 08:06, 3F

03/02 11:40, , 4F
防守隊得分是否一定為達陣?照這規則來說還是直接贏了
03/02 11:40, 4F

03/02 13:11, , 5F
可能是Safety阿
03/02 13:11, 5F

03/02 13:28, , 6F
我覺得照這改法,還不如不改
03/02 13:28, 6F

03/02 16:50, , 7F
大學規則比較好+1
03/02 16:50, 7F

03/02 16:58, , 8F
請問一下 大學規則是啥??
03/02 16:58, 8F

03/02 19:09, , 9F
簡單來說就是以Round計吧
03/02 19:09, 9F
文章代碼(AID): #1BZ30Slu (NFL)
文章代碼(AID): #1BZ30Slu (NFL)