[外電] Twenty-three guys better than Wang? No chance

看板NY-Yankees作者 (Doer brokenheart)時間18年前 (2008/04/08 13:17), 編輯推噓36(36018)
留言54則, 35人參與, 最新討論串1/3 (看更多)
※ [本文轉錄自 CMWang 看板] 作者: wesun (統一獅王重返榮耀^^) 站內: CMWang 標題: [外電] Twenty-three guys better than Wang? No chance 時間: Tue Apr 8 13:12:52 2008 網路上看到到的...不知道有沒有PO過 我不會縮網址 sorry= =" http://www.bugsandcranks.com/new-york-yankees/twenty-three-guys-better-than-wang-no-chance/ My post about whether or not Chien-Ming Wang is an ace seems to have stirred up the passions on both sides. ‘Chad’ goes so far as to take up my challenge to name 10 better starters — with stats — by dropping 23 names with ERA as his sole piece of evidence. Let’s be serious here and take Chad’s entire list, from my perspective, and I’ll tell you which pitcher I think is better right now. Here is the list. 1. Jake Peavy 2. Johan Santana 3. Josh Beckett 4. CC Sabathia 5. Erik Bedard 6. Brandon Webb 7. John Smoltz 8. Dan Haren 9. Chris Young 10. Cole Hamels 11. John Lackey 12. Gil Meche 13. Justin Verlander 14. Matt Cain 15. Mark Buerhle 16. Oliver Perez 17. Scott Kazmir 18. Kelvim Escobar 19. Tim Hudson 20. Chad Billingsley 21. Roy Oswalt 22. Fausto Carmona 23. Brad Penny Now let’s go one-by-one and break it down, looking at their numbers from 2006 and 2007. Those are, in fairness to Wang, his only full major league seasons. 1. Jake Peavy vs. Wang — 19-6 with a terrific 2.54 ERA last season. But, 11-14 with a worse than league average 4.09 ERA in 2006. Oh, and in two post-season starts, an 0-2 record with a 12.10 ERA. Wang in those two years is 38-13, having lost fewer games in two seasons that Peavy did in one. Advantage: Wang 2. Johan Santana — The Mets’ prized acquisition is clearly the best left-handed starter in the game (sorry, CC Sabathia). He has won 34 games in the past two seasons, and at least 15 in each of his four years as a starter. I’m not going to argue here, because Santan’s presence would make Wang a No. 2. One thing I will say, though, is a check of Santana’s post-season record reveals only a 1-4 career mark with a 3.97 ERA. So, regular season greatness does not always translate to post-season success. Advantage: Santana 3. Josh Beckett — The only question there has ever been with Beckett has been health. He has answered that the last two seasons, pitching 200 or more innings each season. Beckett won 20 last year, but remember that he did post a 5.01 ERA in 2006. Still, his post-season work — 6-0 in 10 starts with a miniscule 1.73 ERA — separates him. Advantage: Beckett 4. CC Sabathia — 19-7 last season with a 3.21 ERA while winning the Cy Young Award, but only 7 games over .500 in the three seasons prior to that. Oh, and what did CC do in the playoffs last season? A 5.40 ERA against the Yankees and 10.45 in two starts against Boston. Again, regular season success means nothing in the post-season. Sabathia pitched 241 innings last season, the first time since 2002 he topped the 200 mark. I need to see him do it again. Advantage: None 5. Erik Bedard — Bedard is a nice pitcher, and I give him tons of credit for going 28-16 over two seasons with the bumbling Orioles. His 3.16 ERA pitching largely in that bandbox in Baltimore — almost 1.5 runs below league average — is impressive. But, Bedard has never pitched 200 innings in a season and you can’t be an ace if you haven’t proven you can carry the workload — which he hasn’t. Also, despite his nice numbers can you name a meaningful game the guy has ever pitched in. Let’s see what he does this season with Seattle before we even consider Bedard for ‘ace’ status. Advantage: Wang 6. Brandon Webb — The reigning NL Cy Young Award winner is a sinkerballer and maybe the most similar guy to Wang on this entire list. Webb has won 34 games the past two seasons and has pitched at least 229 innings each of the past three seasons. He strikes out more hitters than Wang and gives up fewer hits, but I would like to see how he would fare against American League lineups. For now, though, I’d give him a slight edge. Advantage: Webb 7. John Smoltz –The Braves’ righty has been a great pitcher for a long time, there is no arguing that. He has won 30 gams combined and pitched more than 200 innings in each of the past two seasons. He has been a terrific post-season pitcher as well, going 12-12 with a 2.65 ERA and four saves in 40 appearances. If I was choosing someone to build around I would take Wang. If I need someone to start one game, there is probably no one else I would rather give the ball to than Smoltz, who will soon be 41. Advantage: Smoltz 8. Dan Haren — When was this guy ever the ace of any staff he has been on? He’s certainly not the ace this year in Arizona, so I’m not sure he should even be in this conversation. His 15-9 record last season was the most games he has ever won, and the first time in his career he has finished more than two games above .500. He’s a good pitcher and an innings-eater, having pitched at least 217 innings in each of his three full seasons, but that’s all. Advantage: Wang 9. Chris Young — Laughable that he is on this list. Won 9 games last year and has never won more than 12 in his career. Nice 3.12 ERA, but no better than a two or three on any staff, anywhere. On the Yankees he would be third behind Wang and Andy Pettitte, and maybe fourth behind Phil Hughes. Advantage: Wang 10. Cole Hamels — Hamels is headed for a terrific career. Yet, he has had one full big-league season and has yet to pitch 200 innings. Is he even the Phillies ace, or would that title go to Brett Myers who is back in the rotation after spending last year in the bullpen? Advantage: Wang 11. John Lackey — Dominant last season (19-9, 3.01 ERA), but more like Pettitte than a true No. 1. He’s been good for a while, but had never won more than 14 games prior to last season. I need to see him do it again before I call him a true ace. Advantage: Wang 12. Gil Meche — Like Chris Young, I find it incomprehensible that anyone can think Meche is a better pitcher than Wang. Won 15 games in 2003, but hasn’t won more than 11 since. Went 9-13 last year. I know he hasn’t pitched for good teams, but this is a guy with a 4.47 ERA in 8 seasons. He might be the best starter the Royals have, but you can hardly call him an ace. Advantage: Wang 13. Justin Verlander — This guy is a young Smoltz, a flamethrower who can be absolutely dominant when he is right. He went 35-15 the past two seasons, and at 25 is still growing into what will likely be a great career. Topped 200 innings for the first time last season (201). He has not been successful in the post-season yet, starting four games and pitching to a 5.82 ERA. Right now, he and Wang are probably equal. Verlander, though, is still getting better. Advantage: Verlander 14. Matt Cain — Are you freakin’ kidding me? A guy who went 7-16 last season and has a 22-29 career record? Ridiculous! Advantage: Wang 15. Mark Buerhle – A couple of years ago this might have been an argument. In 2004 and 2005 Buerhle was an ace. He has fallen a long way, though, going 22-22 the past two seasons and seeing his innings drop from 245 in 2004 to 201 last year. Buerhle is a middle of the rotation guy at this point in his career. Advantage: Wang 16. Oliver Perez — When I stop laughing maybe I’ll comment on this ………… OK, 15-10, 3.64 ERA last year. A nice year when there were no expectations for him, but he’s not an ace. When the Pirates thought he was he pitched himself back to AAA. Better than Wang? If you think so I feel sorry for you. Advantage: Wang 17. Scott Kazmir — Now this is a guy who COULD be an ace. He won a career high 13 games with a 3.48 ERA and worked more innings than Wang (206.7), but he is still young and still has a lot to prove. Included in that is whether or not he can stay healthy, carry a staff and pitch well in meaningful, pressure games. So far, he’s done none of those things. Advantage: Wang 18. Kelvim Escobar — Had a breakout season last year (18-7, 3.40 ERA), but prior to that was 90-90 in the first 10 seasons of his career. Great stuff, but one good season does not make him an ace. Advantage: Wang 19. Tim Hudson — This guy ‘was’ an ace for years in Oakland. He went 16-10 with a 3.33 ERA for Atlanta in 2007, his best season since 2003. Chews up a lot of innings and is a very good pitcher. To me, a lot like Haren or even Mike Mussina in his prime. Very good, I want him on my staff. But, I’m not sure he’s a No. 1 any longer. Advantage: Wang 20. Chad Billingsley — This guy has tremendous ability and might someday be an ace, but it’s too early for him to be in this conversation. It would like putting the Yankees’ Hughes in here, and at this point neither of them belong. Advantage: Wang 21. Roy Oswalt — This guy is an ace, but last year pitched his fewest innings (212) and won his fewest games (14) since 2003. He is a guy who doesn’t fear big games and has a 3-2 record in post-season with a 3.66 ERA. This is a tough call for me, but based on how long he has been doing it and the fact that he is still at — or very near — his peak, I would go with the Astro ace. Advantage: Oswalt 22. Fausto Carmona — Carmona was tremendous last season in his first full year in the big leagues, going 19-8 with a 3.06 ERA in 215 innings. If he can do it again then I’ll say he is Wang’s class. But not yet. Advantage: Wang 23. Brad Penny — Penny has gone 32-13 the past two seasons. He did, however, post a 4.33 ERA in 2006 and that’s not an ‘ace’ ERA. Like with Carmona, I need to see another year like 2007, when he posted a 3.03 ERA and pitched 208 innings before I call him a real ace. Advantage: Wang So, of the 23 starting pitchers ‘Chad’ wants to put ahead of Wang I will give you five, and call Sabathia a ‘push.’ That doesn’t mean there are only 5 guys better than Wang (Roy Halladay, for example, wasn’t on this list). If you are fair about it, though, and really look at the numbers you have to admit Wang ranks pretty darn high on the list of best starting pitchers in the league. An ace? Definitely. Arguments, anyone? Let’s hear ‘em. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 208.170.67.192

04/08 13:14,
誇張 連紅襪的新人投手都有
04/08 13:14

04/08 13:15,
看錯 沒事
04/08 13:15
-- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.63.21.3

04/08 13:35, , 1F
縮網址 http://0rz.tw/
04/08 13:35, 1F

04/08 13:40, , 2F
很多棒球作家很愛討論這個問題 大概是看洋基的ace被一個黃皮
04/08 13:40, 2F

04/08 13:41, , 3F
膚的人佔據 想盡辦法要貶低他的身價 比王建民好的投手很多
04/08 13:41, 3F

04/08 13:42, , 4F
但是我想王是最適合洋基的
04/08 13:42, 4F

04/08 13:44, , 5F
神經病才會列 Oliver Perez
04/08 13:44, 5F

04/08 13:44, , 6F
幾個小朋友就更不用說了, 養不養的起來都是未知數
04/08 13:44, 6F

04/08 13:44, , 7F
樓上至少把標題看完再推文吧
04/08 13:44, 7F

04/08 13:46, , 8F
2樓
04/08 13:46, 8F

04/08 13:48, , 9F
洋基是團體作戰 沒有明星球員(誤)
04/08 13:48, 9F

04/08 13:49, , 10F
Twenty-three guys better than Wang?「 No chance」
04/08 13:49, 10F

04/08 13:49, , 11F
...二樓超酷的,比王建民好的投手會不適合洋基喔?
04/08 13:49, 11F

04/08 13:51, , 12F
這篇是在證明 王是Ace吧
04/08 13:51, 12F

04/08 13:52, , 13F
....又要開始擺板凳、吃雞排了嗎?O_o?
04/08 13:52, 13F

04/08 13:53, , 14F
比王好不代表穿 Pinstripes 就投的好, 失敗例子很多啊
04/08 13:53, 14F

04/08 13:55, , 15F
這作家明明就很挺王...
04/08 13:55, 15F

04/08 13:59, , 16F
看到他說ridiculous 我也跟著笑出來了~~~
04/08 13:59, 16F

04/08 14:00, , 17F
太唬爛了 JAKE Peavy比王差?
04/08 14:00, 17F

04/08 14:06, , 18F
這篇是在挺王吧= ="
04/08 14:06, 18F

04/08 14:06, , 19F
這作家超級自嗨...XD
04/08 14:06, 19F

04/08 14:06, , 20F
這篇在挺王啊...二樓你看了內文嗎?
04/08 14:06, 20F

04/08 14:07, , 21F
是說他真的吼HIGH啊XD~~~
04/08 14:07, 21F

04/08 14:44, , 22F
簡單看一下內文你就會知道他對小王有滿滿的愛= =a
04/08 14:44, 22F

04/08 14:49, , 23F
不用看內文啦...看一下每一點的最後兩個字就好了XD
04/08 14:49, 23F

04/08 15:04, , 24F
這證明 , 當文章的英文多時 , 少數人會不看內文就翻譯 = ="
04/08 15:04, 24F

04/08 15:19, , 25F
真的有虎爛 有點high
04/08 15:19, 25F

04/08 15:25, , 26F
徵求翻譯蒟蒻...><
04/08 15:25, 26F

04/08 16:12, , 27F
根本沒看文就罵人...
04/08 16:12, 27F

04/08 16:34, , 28F
小王越低調越能投出好成績
04/08 16:34, 28F

04/08 16:44, , 29F
先把16..18..20去掉吧...
04/08 16:44, 29F

04/08 17:10, , 30F
用勝敗場次來比Matt Cain和王建民,這種文章需要認真看嗎?
04/08 17:10, 30F

04/08 17:15, , 31F
勝敗雖然在數據頭裡是不被重視的,不過在一般人裡,甚至
04/08 17:15, 31F

04/08 17:16, , 32F
球員裡都還是有意義的。不過我不懂這有什麼好吵的。
04/08 17:16, 32F

04/08 17:17, , 33F
如果接下來兩年都有15+ wins,不想當ace人家也自動會把
04/08 17:17, 33F

04/08 17:17, , 34F
你當ace。投不出成績就當然就不是ace啊。這有什麼好吵的
04/08 17:17, 34F

04/08 17:28, , 35F
1.Jake Peavy......Advantage:Wang(超high......)
04/08 17:28, 35F

04/08 17:37, , 36F
我看到這個就跳過去了(煙)
04/08 17:37, 36F

04/08 17:49, , 37F
實力會證明一切.
04/08 17:49, 37F

04/08 18:30, , 38F
ㄍㄍ的對手:美聯重砲部隊 Webb的對手:虛弱老人隊
04/08 18:30, 38F

04/08 18:32, , 39F
結論:ㄍㄍ大勝!!
04/08 18:32, 39F

04/08 18:39, , 40F
用vorp看吧
04/08 18:39, 40F

04/08 19:12, , 41F
拿Smoltz出來比不太公平.....
04/08 19:12, 41F

04/08 19:49, , 42F
14點看不太懂
04/08 19:49, 42F

04/08 19:52, , 43F
喔喔 勝敗場次嗎
04/08 19:52, 43F

04/08 20:03, , 44F
14..意思是說 這種人拿來跟王比? 可笑
04/08 20:03, 44F

04/08 22:34, , 45F
不是我想吐槽 洋基最弱的就是SP
04/08 22:34, 45F

04/08 22:35, , 46F
這種文的確自high過頭 Cain那個理由也太瞎了
04/08 22:35, 46F

04/08 22:37, , 47F
王現在的確是Rotation ACE我並不反對
04/08 22:37, 47F

04/08 22:39, , 48F
但是要證明他是ace也不必把其他選手都看得太扁
04/08 22:39, 48F

04/08 22:41, , 49F
為什麼列 Oliver Perez 會是神經病
04/08 22:41, 49F

04/08 22:42, , 50F
來大都會後他已經慢慢找回當初人稱小 RJ 的水準了
04/08 22:42, 50F

04/08 22:48, , 51F
而且我也不覺得表中有哪個還需要養的小朋友...
04/08 22:48, 51F

04/08 23:34, , 52F
很奇怪他一直提別人季後賽成績不怎樣~卻不提王的一起比~
04/08 23:34, 52F

04/08 23:34, , 53F
另外就是王在mlb只是第四季~其他有些都10+季了~王過去兩年
04/08 23:34, 53F

04/08 23:36, , 54F
剛好是成績中上的兩年~如果把其他人生涯最佳兩年比未必差
04/08 23:36, 54F
文章代碼(AID): #17-l_tWv (NY-Yankees)
文章代碼(AID): #17-l_tWv (NY-Yankees)