[新聞] Yankees - Signed Teixeira
http://tinyurl.com/75zpkl
New York Yankees - Signed 1B Mark Teixeira to an 8-year, $180 million contract.
I'm not a Yankees fan and I can't envision a scenario in which I'd root for
the team.
However, the strongest advocates of a salary cap, the ones ranting about
salaries in light of the economy, are full of hot air. And something else, but
the site nanny won't let me say it.
MLB's revenues have been exploding since 2003 and player salaries have simply
not matched this increase in revenues. In 2003, players in baseball made 63% of
league revenues. In 2008, that number appears to be 52% of league revenues,
or less than any of the other major professional leagues in the US, which all
have salary caps.
For decades, wonks, wags, and wigs have told us that player salaries drive
upward ticket prices and that arguments about supply and demand are theoretical
constructs for an imaginary world. But in the real world, during a time in
which the player's slice of the pie has dropped tremendously (a $400 million
loss of the pie in 2008 alone, relative to 2003), ticket prices have continued
to gone up unabated. Just as expected, savings from limiting the salaries of
those mean old players have been filtered
directly into the pockets of owners. Owners who cry poverty and get welfare
stadiums. Republicans talked about welfare queens 15 years ago, but it would
take thousands of so-called queens driving around in taxpayer Cadillacs to
match some of the true members of that category. Take Jeff Loria, who pockets
revenue-sharing money and then turns around and gets an additional honeypot
in the form an apparently imminent fancy-new stadium. If MLB owners were in
charge of the TARP funds, the $700 billion would
already be completely gone and the sycophantic media, ever-hungry for prestige,
quotes, and free pastrami on rye, would blame it on pay raises for local
janitorial staff.
Now, to the Yankees. I've been stalling on saying nice things about the team,
but I guess I've got to bite the bullet and get it over with. The Yankees have
a mindset that is good for baseball and the US would be better off if more
companies possessed the Yankee mindset.
The Yankees do spend more money than other teams in MLB, but the differences
would be less drastic if the payrolls of many teams had been rising up to the
waves of new cash that have entered baseball in recent years. Going by the NFL
formula, very generous considering the MLBPA is far more powerful an entity
than any other union in sports, the payroll floor for 2009 would almost
certainly be in the $100 million range. 58% of league revenue, as the players
in NFL get, would be, in baseball, an average team payroll of a hair under
$120 million. It's pretty clear that while the Yankees are outspending everyone
comfortably, the rest of baseball has just as much to do with the payroll
disparity as the Yankees do.
Now, what about the Yankee mindset? The Steinbrenners aren't anywhere near as
rich or as liquid as some other owners in baseball such as Carl Pohlad of the
Twins. The difference is that the Steinbrenners have always invested in their
team, always striven to put the best product possible out on the field. The
Yankees have certainly made some terrible trades, especially when King George
was hands-on the most, but they were done with the motive of making the team
better. Yes, the Yankees got a huge, undeserved payday from the locals for
their stadium, like most teams in baseball did, but it's a mitigating factor
that they're actually plowing those funds back into the on-field product. And
the team never threatened to not compete until they got their sweet check.
Perhaps a small difference, but I see it as a good bit more ethical than
Kevin McClatchy demanding taxpayer moneys to help the Pirates compete and then
turn around and use all the money to fund his failing media empire
Now, what about Mark Teixeira? The benefits of Teixeira are pretty obvious,
he's a fine defensive 1B who hits very well and should be a relatively safe
bet for the Yankees over the course of his contract. He's not A-Rod or peak
Manny, but Teixeira's a very good player and while he may only be a bit
above-average by his mid-30s, $22.5 million likely won't be exorbitant for an
average player on the FA market in 2016.
Arte Moreno may get to have the personal satisfaction of feeling like the
injured party, but this is what Tex was going to make when the Angels acquired
him and if they weren't going to play serious ball, the Angels should never
have done the Kotchman trade. Perhaps they'll change the rules of baseball
during the season and allow moral victories to win games, minimizing the damage
that the team offense, 10th in the AL in runs with a huge couple of months of
Teixeira thrown in, can do.
ZiPS Projection - Mark Teixeira
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB BA OBP SLG OPS+
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2009 545 101 159 37 1 28 115 83 103 2 .292 .392 .517 137
2010 552 99 165 37 1 31 114 90 104 1 .299 .402 .538 145
2011 536 95 157 34 1 29 110 90 99 0 .293 .399 .522 141
2012 537 92 154 34 1 26 102 90 102 0 .287 .394 .499 134
2013 533 87 148 34 1 24 97 87 104 0 .278 .384 .480 126
2014 540 87 150 34 1 24 95 88 106 0 .278 .384 .478 126
2015 529 82 144 33 1 21 88 84 103 0 .272 .377 .457 119
2016 529 80 143 32 1 20 84 83 102 0 .270 .375 .448 116
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 125.224.4.137
※ 編輯: pikachu123 來自: 125.224.4.137 (12/25 01:32)
推
12/25 01:33, , 1F
12/25 01:33, 1F
推
12/25 01:34, , 2F
12/25 01:34, 2F
→
12/25 01:35, , 3F
12/25 01:35, 3F
→
12/25 01:36, , 4F
12/25 01:36, 4F
推
12/25 01:38, , 5F
12/25 01:38, 5F
推
12/25 01:38, , 6F
12/25 01:38, 6F
推
12/25 01:40, , 7F
12/25 01:40, 7F
推
12/25 01:41, , 8F
12/25 01:41, 8F
推
12/25 01:41, , 9F
12/25 01:41, 9F
推
12/25 01:41, , 10F
12/25 01:41, 10F
→
12/25 01:41, , 11F
12/25 01:41, 11F
推
12/25 01:42, , 12F
12/25 01:42, 12F
推
12/25 01:43, , 13F
12/25 01:43, 13F
→
12/25 01:44, , 14F
12/25 01:44, 14F
推
12/25 01:44, , 15F
12/25 01:44, 15F
推
12/25 01:46, , 16F
12/25 01:46, 16F
推
12/25 01:52, , 17F
12/25 01:52, 17F
→
12/25 01:57, , 18F
12/25 01:57, 18F
推
12/25 02:05, , 19F
12/25 02:05, 19F
→
12/25 02:05, , 20F
12/25 02:05, 20F
推
12/25 02:07, , 21F
12/25 02:07, 21F
→
12/25 02:07, , 22F
12/25 02:07, 22F
推
12/25 02:09, , 23F
12/25 02:09, 23F
推
12/25 02:11, , 24F
12/25 02:11, 24F
推
12/25 02:12, , 25F
12/25 02:12, 25F
推
12/25 02:14, , 26F
12/25 02:14, 26F
推
12/25 02:15, , 27F
12/25 02:15, 27F
推
12/25 02:16, , 28F
12/25 02:16, 28F
→
12/25 02:17, , 29F
12/25 02:17, 29F
推
12/25 02:18, , 30F
12/25 02:18, 30F
推
12/25 02:18, , 31F
12/25 02:18, 31F
→
12/25 02:19, , 32F
12/25 02:19, 32F
→
12/25 02:20, , 33F
12/25 02:20, 33F
推
12/25 02:20, , 34F
12/25 02:20, 34F
→
12/25 02:22, , 35F
12/25 02:22, 35F
→
12/25 02:23, , 36F
12/25 02:23, 36F
推
12/25 02:23, , 37F
12/25 02:23, 37F
→
12/25 02:23, , 38F
12/25 02:23, 38F
推
12/25 02:23, , 39F
12/25 02:23, 39F
還有 173 則推文
→
12/25 03:58, , 213F
12/25 03:58, 213F
→
12/25 03:58, , 214F
12/25 03:58, 214F
→
12/25 03:59, , 215F
12/25 03:59, 215F
→
12/25 03:59, , 216F
12/25 03:59, 216F
推
12/25 04:00, , 217F
12/25 04:00, 217F
→
12/25 04:00, , 218F
12/25 04:00, 218F
→
12/25 04:00, , 219F
12/25 04:00, 219F
→
12/25 04:01, , 220F
12/25 04:01, 220F
→
12/25 04:01, , 221F
12/25 04:01, 221F
→
12/25 04:02, , 222F
12/25 04:02, 222F
→
12/25 04:03, , 223F
12/25 04:03, 223F
→
12/25 04:03, , 224F
12/25 04:03, 224F
→
12/25 04:04, , 225F
12/25 04:04, 225F
→
12/25 04:05, , 226F
12/25 04:05, 226F
推
12/25 04:05, , 227F
12/25 04:05, 227F
→
12/25 04:05, , 228F
12/25 04:05, 228F
→
12/25 04:06, , 229F
12/25 04:06, 229F
→
12/25 04:07, , 230F
12/25 04:07, 230F
→
12/25 04:07, , 231F
12/25 04:07, 231F
→
12/25 04:07, , 232F
12/25 04:07, 232F
→
12/25 04:08, , 233F
12/25 04:08, 233F
→
12/25 04:09, , 234F
12/25 04:09, 234F
→
12/25 04:10, , 235F
12/25 04:10, 235F
→
12/25 04:11, , 236F
12/25 04:11, 236F
→
12/25 04:11, , 237F
12/25 04:11, 237F
→
12/25 04:11, , 238F
12/25 04:11, 238F
→
12/25 04:12, , 239F
12/25 04:12, 239F
→
12/25 04:13, , 240F
12/25 04:13, 240F
推
12/25 06:55, , 241F
12/25 06:55, 241F
推
12/25 07:01, , 242F
12/25 07:01, 242F
推
12/25 07:39, , 243F
12/25 07:39, 243F
→
12/25 07:41, , 244F
12/25 07:41, 244F
→
12/25 08:46, , 245F
12/25 08:46, 245F
推
12/25 08:50, , 246F
12/25 08:50, 246F
→
12/25 08:52, , 247F
12/25 08:52, 247F
推
12/25 09:59, , 248F
12/25 09:59, 248F
推
12/25 10:14, , 249F
12/25 10:14, 249F
推
12/25 10:32, , 250F
12/25 10:32, 250F
推
12/25 19:01, , 251F
12/25 19:01, 251F
推
12/26 00:45, , 252F
12/26 00:45, 252F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
NY-Yankees 近期熱門文章
215
426
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章