Re: [洋基] Player A and Player B

看板NY-Yankees作者 (黃家大少)時間17年前 (2009/03/26 10:40), 編輯推噓12(1209)
留言21則, 17人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
看過一些Blog作家的說法.. 因為牛奶弟就理論上而言應該會被交易出去吧啦... 所以腿弟會是我們開幕的CF.. 然後外野3個位置 就是由 大門,腿弟,Nady跟Swisher然輪... 不過重點來了.. 有一些作家認為腿弟應該那種威只會威一段短時間的.. 所以如果腿弟真的打的太糟糕.. 那麼Swisher應該還是會去接腿弟那個CF的位子...(雖然他守不好.) 畢竟在你放個人型看板在打擊區上跟放個人型看板再CF.. 好像放人型看板再CF傷害比較小..XD 不過還是要等開季打了才知道... 不過看Nady跟Swisher的春訓.. 我覺得真的很難比較.. 兩個人的成績好像差不多... ※ 引述《leddy (耿秋)》之銘言: : http://blog.nj.com/yankees : Player A and Player B : Posted by Mike March 24, 2009 7:12PM : Imagine there are two players, Player A and Player B. They play the same : position with both being about average in the field and on the bases. They've : also had almost the same amount of career plate appearances. Based on the : following information, who would you rather play? (I'm sure most of you will : quickly identify Players A and B) : Career OPS+ : Player A: 108 (Coming off career best year) : Player B: 112 (Coming off career worst year) : 162 Game Averages : Player A: .280, 21, 78 : Player B: .244, 28, 86 : Career OBP : Player A: .335 : Player B: .354 : Number of 20+ Homerun Seasons : Player A: 2 (Career high of 25) : Player B: 4 (Career high of 35) : Age : Player A: 30 : Player B: 28 : Bats : Player A: Right : Player B: Switch : Ability To Make Pitchers Work : Player A: Not So Great : Player B: Great : 料理東西軍, 你要選那一個? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.46.151.243

03/26 11:25, , 1F
腿弟被打回原形應該是早晚的問題吧...
03/26 11:25, 1F

03/26 11:35, , 2F
反正Melky跟腿弟都不是我們CF的長久方案
03/26 11:35, 2F

03/26 11:46, , 3F
小王: 反正外野擺誰我都沒差...要擺齁黑也可以喔 (誤)
03/26 11:46, 3F

03/26 12:32, , 4F
腿弟如果數據沒降回去..那我們家又要多一個HOF了? XD
03/26 12:32, 4F

03/26 12:34, , 5F
Gardner只要長出跟Jeter全盛期一樣的power..那不是開完笑的
03/26 12:34, 5F

03/26 12:34, , 6F
哪個數據??去年大聯盟那個??很慘好不好......
03/26 12:34, 6F

03/26 12:35, , 7F
春訓的數據啦XD
03/26 12:35, 7F

03/26 12:35, , 8F
別搞笑了好不好,Gardner小聯盟都打的沒Jeter大聯盟好了.
03/26 12:35, 8F

03/26 12:36, , 9F
Gardner?拜託你想太多了
03/26 12:36, 9F

03/26 12:36, , 10F
春訓數據??唉,人家都看大聯盟的數據的,春訓看看就好.
03/26 12:36, 10F

03/26 12:38, , 11F
不行 腿弟禿頭 打得跟Jeter一樣好也沒用(誤)
03/26 12:38, 11F

03/26 13:19, , 12F
Gardner能打出平均值 我會覺得我們賺很大 賺不用錢
03/26 13:19, 12F

03/26 13:20, , 13F
.270/.330/.380
03/26 13:20, 13F

03/26 13:26, , 14F
我比較樂觀 .280/.360/.380
03/26 13:26, 14F

03/26 13:39, , 15F
Gardner OPS有.7就要偷笑了 打出樓上的數據大概可以放鞭炮
03/26 13:39, 15F

03/26 14:14, , 16F
.432/.617/.999
03/26 14:14, 16F

03/26 14:41, , 17F
OPS+100就上天保佑了
03/26 14:41, 17F

03/26 16:39, , 18F
Nady跟Swisher都可能打不好 那當然有選球的比較好
03/26 16:39, 18F

03/26 16:39, , 19F
尤其去年一個是過high一個是過low XD
03/26 16:39, 19F

03/26 23:14, , 20F
突然想到 小王上場時可以擺Damon CF, Swisher LF
03/26 23:14, 20F

03/26 23:37, , 21F
或然輪
03/26 23:37, 21F
文章代碼(AID): #19okiPb- (NY-Yankees)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #19okiPb- (NY-Yankees)