討論串[討論] 今年的合約跟交易
共 31 篇文章
內容預覽:
Let me put it this way. Now, think of two Johan Santana on the trading. block, one with NTC, the other without. If other things being equal, who willb
(還有1173個字)
內容預覽:
is over. Just like the Santana case.. In Santana's case, the reason Mets signed him with a fat contract is notbecause Mets want a contract long and bi
(還有163個字)
內容預覽:
The question is whether you can get things done by money ONLY. Even if CC enters FA market after this season, how many chances that. Yankees can land
(還有782個字)
內容預覽:
看了這麼久. 其實最大的問題是在於很多人沒搞清楚簽球員的真相. 我記得去年底討論Santana的時候就看過一個理論. "如果只花錢一定沒問題,但是要丟出農作物就不值得,所以等Santana變FA再來簽吧". 結果是等到Santana變成FA沒?. 現在又要等CC變FA? fine 那就等吧. 如果去
(還有1041個字)
內容預覽:
話說只看這種累計數據的話，其實很容易被誤導. 比如說改列這個數據 GDP/PA (with runner on 1B). Jeter A-Rod. 2003 10/136 16/231. 2004 19/202 18/246. 2005 15/190 8/252. 2006 13/212 22/24
(還有196個字)