PTT體育區 / NY-Yankees

Re: [討論] 今年的合約跟交易

看板NY-Yankees作者 (買雞頭貴過買松阪牛?)時間17年前 (2008/07/05 15:12), 編輯推噓1(1推 0噓 3→)
留言4則, 1人參與, 最新討論串10/31 (看更多)
※ 引述《kafen (石頭)》之銘言： : And the teams obtain those ACEs will sign them long term before the season is over. Just like the Santana case. In Santana's case, the reason Mets signed him with a fat contract is not because Mets want a contract long and big but because Santana had full NTC (no-trade clasue) to void any possible deal that includes him. Mets has to offer a good enough contract to persuade Santana to give up his NTC to complete the deal. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 116.59.68.147 ※ 編輯: vegas 來自: 116.59.68.147 (07/05 15:13)
推
07/05 15:15, , 1F
from Mets' perspective, they might not want to sigh such
07/05 15:15, 1F
→
07/05 15:16, , 2F
a huge contract for that long. So you are right. But
07/05 15:16, 2F
→
07/05 15:17, , 3F
they did not want to simply rent Santana for 1 yr either
07/05 15:17, 3F
→
07/05 15:17, , 4F
especially after giving up that much farm talent
07/05 15:17, 4F
‣ 更多 vegas 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #18RnxYzM (NY-Yankees)
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 10 之 31 篇)：
排序： 最新先 | 最舊先 | 留言數
在新視窗開啟完整討論串 (共31篇)
NY-Yankees 近期熱門文章
更多 近期熱門文章 >>
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
更多 即時熱門文章 >>
‣ 更多 vegas 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #18RnxYzM (NY-Yankees)