Re: [外電] Williams and how not to run a bullpen

看板Nationals作者hunterqiji (hunter)時間11年前 (2014/10/10 03:08)推噓2(2推 0噓 0→)

留言2則, 2人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

http://tinyurl.com/pvsw69n 另外一篇差不多的分析﹐其中有一段話: In the highest leverage situation of the season, Williams turned to a rookie who was his fifth or sixth best reliever. When asked about the decision to go to Thornton and Barrett in his press conference, here's what Williams had to say: 在被問到為什麼在如此關鍵的時刻上一個菜鳥時﹐MW說﹕ "Because those are our seventh-inning guys. That’s how we set this up. We had two lefties at the top of the inning, and if we got to the righties, we were going to Barrett. That’s what he’s done for us all year long. We’re certainly not going to use our closer in the seventh inning." 因為他們是投第7局的人﹐過去一個賽季一直是這樣﹐我們絕對不會提前上Closer. I went on a sizable rant in the comments of a postgame thread earlier this season about the "closer" label and formulaic bullpen usage. Williams was guilty of formulaic bullpen usage on Tuesday. Use your relief ace in the highest leverage situation. Don't create roles where players are limited to pitch based on the inning. With the season on the line, Matt Williams sounded an awful lot like this guy sounded after a mid-September loss. "It’s frustrating that we were one out away from getting to Kelvin Herrera with a one-run lead. That was frustrating." In the postgame postmortem, the obvious follow-up was asked. Why not just use Herrera in the sixth inning then? "Because I had confidence in Aaron Crow. That’s why. Aaron Crow’s inning is the sixth inning. Kelvin’s is the seventh." 作者找到了某人(Ned Yost)本賽季某場比賽類似的調度﹐Yost賽後解釋說:Aaron Crow的角色是第6局﹐Kelvin Herrera是第7局。(這就是為什麼第6局危機還差1出局時﹐他仍然不換Herrera﹐從而輸掉比賽的原因) There's nothing in Tyler Clippard's contract that says he isn't allowed to pitch in the seventh inning. Drew Storen's not going to refuse to pitch again this season if he comes into the highest leverage spot an inning or two earlier than he's used to coming in. The decision was terrible. The justification in the post-game press conference was worse. 比賽中的調度已經很糟糕了﹐但賽後采訪從MW得出這樣的解釋就更加讓原作者無言... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 128.252.20.193 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Nationals/M.1412881681.A.BDC.html ※ 編輯: hunterqiji (128.252.20.193), 10/10/2014 03:08:42 ※ 編輯: hunterqiji (128.252.20.193), 10/10/2014 03:09:36