[情報] 球員介紹:Copeland

看板PACERS (印第安那 溜馬)作者 (It's my Life)時間12年前 (2013/08/16 16:01), 編輯推噓20(20020)
留言40則, 13人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Indiana Pacers 2013 Player Profile: Chris Copeland http://ppt.cc/ZX1H 按: 因為這是個人覺得貴隊最被低估的補強,剛好看到相關文章,就貼過來跟大家分享, 沒有翻成中文,但是內文應該蠻簡單的,就是這個人是個很能製造錯位的前鋒,有著 很好的外線,以及被忽視但真的不錯的籃下進攻,只要給他上場機會就能表現得很好 ;在防守上,欠缺敏捷度跟對抗性,但卻是個很有防守決心的球員,另外他不是個很 好的籃板手或傳球者(雖然他不自私),他比較像是個純得分型的球員。 With their 2013 Eastern Conference Semifinals series nearly over and their backs against the wall, the New York Knicks decided to give reserve swingman Chris Copeland more playing time in a last-ditch effort to generate more offense against a dominant Indiana Pacers defense. “Optimus Cope” made the most of his increased playing time, scoring 11 points per game on 50% shooting from the field and 60% shooting from three over the last two games of the series, impressing Indiana Pacers’ management in the process. Last year’s Pacers had an incredibly efficient starting lineup, but its second unit struggled mightily on offense. Chris Copeland, who had excelled as a bench scorer in limited minutes for the Knicks, was seen as part of the answer to that problem. Casual fans may not be aware of Chris Copeland, the sweet-shooting swingman who had previously played professionally in Belgium, Spain, Holland, Germany and the NBA D-League before finally landing in the NBA at the age of 28, but he could gain recognition this year as a key player on a team with championship aspirations. In the 2012-13 season, Cope’s rookie campaign, he averaged 8.7 points and 2.1 rebounds over the course of 56 games. His per-game numbers don’t exactly jump off the page but he was remarkably efficient in the opportunities he was given and his numbers look much nicer when adjusted for playing time. Copeland’s averages come out to 20.3 points and five rebounds per 36 minutes, all on 47.9% shooting from the field and a very strong 42.1% from beyond the arc (he’s especially deadly on the right wing, where he made better than 56% of his attempts, per NBA.com’s stats database). Furthermore, during a brief stretch where Carmelo Anthony sat out injured, forcing Copeland into the starting lineup, he managed to score 16.1 points per game without a decrease in efficiency. While Copeland likely won’t be getting major minutes, especially with Danny Granger set to return from injury, he will undoubtedly be a regular part of the rotation. Copeland is capable of playing both the small forward and power forward positions. He can be a matchup nightmare at power forward. While he may not be a great ball handler, he’s a clever offensive player that can create good shots against slower defenders. When matched up against small forwards, he has underrated footwork down low and can get points on the block as well. He’s more or less a “pure scorer” though. He’s not selfish on offense but he won’t pick up very many assists and he’s merely an adequate rebounder. Defensively, he plays hard and has even shown a willingness to bang in the post when matched up against a much bigger man, but his lack of strength and agility limit his defensive abilities. When used in a bench unit featuring both him and the newly acquired Luis Scola, the Pacers could experience a fairly significant drop-off on the defensive end. The Pacers are wagering that their offensive skills will be enough to make up for it. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.24.9.157

08/16 16:15, , 1F
他是打SF替補小葛吧 可以讓我們第二陣容有進攻威脅性
08/16 16:15, 1F

08/16 16:16, , 2F
去年板凳的取分能力有夠慘 現在有Scola和他 應該好不少
08/16 16:16, 2F

08/16 17:08, , 3F
原本補他就已經吸引溜馬迷最大的目光,但後來清掉小綠盤來
08/16 17:08, 3F

08/16 17:09, , 4F
四克拉這麼振奮的消息掩蓋住他啦
08/16 17:09, 4F

08/16 17:19, , 5F
也看好CT 更不用說改從板凳出發的Stephenson
08/16 17:19, 5F

08/16 17:30, , 6F
今年我們的替補都可以在一些弱隊當先發了
08/16 17:30, 6F

08/16 17:32, , 7F
現在就差可以打五分鐘的肉柱 感覺上打算等開季才想補上
08/16 17:32, 7F

08/16 17:39, , 8F
Mahinmi可以打20分鐘沒問題吧 XD
08/16 17:39, 8F

08/16 18:39, , 9F
還缺六個禁區犯規可以使用
08/16 18:39, 9F

08/16 21:49, , 10F
可惜送出埔里了
08/16 21:49, 10F

08/16 22:57, , 11F
今年季賽一直到季後賽都看得出2nd unit不夠強
08/16 22:57, 11F

08/16 22:58, , 12F
在保留原陣容而且又補強了2nd unit 其實很不錯
08/16 22:58, 12F

08/16 23:03, , 13F
Mahinmi頂二十分鐘問題不大 目前是缺第三個內線肉柱
08/16 23:03, 13F

08/17 00:19, , 14F
只覺得他在尼克對溜馬沒一開始就用很悲哀
08/17 00:19, 14F

08/17 00:21, , 15F
但對他來溜馬沒啥感覺..反正球團愛這種的 又剛好剋大衛西
08/17 00:21, 15F

08/17 00:25, , 16F
花3M買個打尼克少了點劣勢的保險這樣
08/17 00:25, 16F

08/17 00:36, , 17F
反正就是看教練會不會用 他動作不協調有速度但不俐落
08/17 00:36, 17F

08/17 00:42, , 18F
敏捷度真的就是他比較糟的地方 容易被看破手腳
08/17 00:42, 18F

08/17 01:15, , 19F
如果教練團不敢在playoff把埔里派上場(非垃圾時間),
08/17 01:15, 19F

08/17 01:16, , 20F
那送走並沒差,而他在季賽能提供的也很有限。
08/17 01:16, 20F

08/17 01:21, , 21F
Copeland並不像溜馬教練團愛用的34號長人(苦力爛仗手)
08/17 01:21, 21F

08/17 01:23, , 22F
不認為對尼克我們有辛苦到需要花3M挖對手牆角買保險
08/17 01:23, 22F

08/17 01:23, , 23F
Copeland絕對有他的用處
08/17 01:23, 23F

08/17 01:24, , 24F
我覺得取得Cope,算是制服組思維的轉變,而非常規選擇。
08/17 01:24, 24F

08/17 01:29, , 25F
總之同意原PO,這交易算是相當值得期待的補強。
08/17 01:29, 25F

08/17 01:32, , 26F
唯一押錯寶的情況是: 他表現和Green一樣,融不進隊伍。
08/17 01:32, 26F
我覺得這邊還有個思維,先發妙麗+West的進攻模式,現在到了板凳變成Cope+Scola, 是不是也是很類似的得分體系(當然等級有差)?溜馬現在的2-unit幾乎球風跟功用, 就都是先發的中產階級/略窮人版: C.J.Watson→會自己找尋投籃機會、攻擊欲望強的後衛─G.Hill Lance→提供活力能量、利用體能身材切入─P.George Cope→同位置中較為高大的身材、外線進攻─妙麗 Scola→公園阿伯─West Mahinmi→身高跟籃下防守嚇阻─Hibbert

08/17 10:04, , 27F
他的用處就是補強替補火力 而且他在歐洲打滾多年 也不算是
08/17 10:04, 27F

08/17 10:05, , 28F
菜鳥了 我想他會找到適合自己融入球隊的方式
08/17 10:05, 28F

08/17 10:07, , 29F
至少可以期待的是 換替補上場後不會連投都不敢投的貧攻狀態
08/17 10:07, 29F

08/17 10:08, , 30F
Copeland出手算果敢 命中率也不差 該傳的時候傳 這樣就好了
08/17 10:08, 30F

08/17 10:09, , 31F
我們的錢就只有這些 挖到四克拉已經算了不起了 很難在去要
08/17 10:09, 31F

08/17 10:10, , 32F
求其他補強的替補球員都要攻守具備 球團只能針對弱點補強
08/17 10:10, 32F

08/17 10:11, , 33F
既然上季攻擊力太差 那就犧牲一點防禦力 去換攻擊力大提升
08/17 10:11, 33F

08/17 10:12, , 34F
如果教練團還是老樣子只愛用苦力爛帳 那球隊高度也提升不了
08/17 10:12, 34F

08/17 10:13, , 35F
教練團不跟著突破進步的話 永遠走不到Finals
08/17 10:13, 35F
※ 編輯: AhUtopian 來自: 124.109.115.225 (08/17 12:30)

08/17 12:57, , 36F
同意512的想法,我也認為這種思維轉變是必須的
08/17 12:57, 36F

08/17 13:00, , 37F
融入隊伍與否,還是得等待實戰方見分曉
08/17 13:00, 37F

08/19 22:19, , 38F
我覺的最好的交易就是四克拉了啦 好期待
08/19 22:19, 38F

08/19 22:20, , 39F
他如果跟大衛西聯手,根本聯盟最強的PF組合連線
08/19 22:20, 39F

08/19 23:38, , 40F
這篇在尼克版看過 推
08/19 23:38, 40F
文章代碼(AID): #1I3TnRR3 (PACERS)
文章代碼(AID): #1I3TnRR3 (PACERS)