[農場] Draft Summary Post (Part 2)

看板Rays作者 (胖胖)時間14年前 (2011/06/14 17:18), 編輯推噓1(103)
留言4則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/1
The selections: (Baseball America Top 200, MLB.com Top 50, DiamondScape Scouting Top 300, MLB Bonus Baby Top 200, ProjectProspect Top 75.) 1-24: Taylor Guerrieri - (BA:10, MLB:13, DSS:24, MLBBB:26, PP:6) - RHP Guerrieri seems to be a very good value pick and I like it very much from a talent standpoint. Is his makeup going to cause any problems, though? He is not returning Rays calls! 1. 資質不錯但其個性會產生問題。 2. 不想鳥球團。 1-31: Mikie Mahtook - (BA:21, MLB:22, DSS45, MLBBB:16, PP:16) - OF A good value pick again. He will end up in RF and he has some adjustments to make with his swing. Nevertheless, he can do it all and can become an above average major leaguer. 1. 預估會轉成RF且需要調整其打擊機制。 2. 可成為MLB平均以上水準球員。 1-32: Jake Hager - (BA:122, MLB: -, DSS:46, MLBBB: -, PP:67) - SS Some evaluaters like him (DSS, PP) and others don't (BA, MLB Bonus Baby). But, apparently, not one ranking has him as high as the Rays. Lets hope R.J. and company are right. 1. 極少數評價系統喜歡他,其在光芒球探系統評價很高。 2. 相信R.J.(R.J. Harrison 球探)和球團的眼光是正確的。 1-38: Brandon Martin - (BA:65, MLB: -, DSS:100, MLBBB:107, PP:75) - SS Martin is an athletic SS who rose up draft boards late before the draft. Nevertheless, nobody had him rising into the 1st. supp. round like the Rays did. The Rays like defensive versatility, though, and Martin should be able to play both MIF positions. 1. 沒有任何球團會在三明治選秀裡選他但光芒作到了。 2. 球隊喜歡其守備多功能性,應可勝任MI。 1-41: Tyler Goeddel - (BA:89, MLB: -, DSS:81, MLBBB:111, PP:48) - 3B Finally a projectable guy in the supplemental round. I like this pick and I easily see why the Rays like him despite being an overdraft according to the ranking boards. 1. 作者喜歡這個PICK且能理解為啥球團願意花前面順位選下他。 2. http://tinyurl.com/3mhfhos 球探報告 1-42: Jeff Ames - (BA:119, MLB: -, DSS:176, MLBBB:116, PP: -) - RHP Remembers me a bit of Ian Kendall's profile last year. Kendall, though, seemed to have better breaking stuff with a bit a lesser FB. Ames is an overdraft. That is a fact. The Rays know what to do with raw prep arms with heat, though. I trust them to develop Ames more than I do with a guy like Hager. 1. 事實上 Ames 不值這個PICK。 2. 作者相信農場可將其優秀的潛力發展出來如同 Hager。 1-52: Blake Snell - (BA:184, MLB: -, DSS:157, MLBBB: -, PP:69) - LHP I've to tone right in with Kevin on this one. I wanted the Rays to select Blake Snell but I wanted them to do that in the 4th-6th round. Not as projectable (while having room to fill out the frame) as lots of other pitchers available at this point (e.g.: Hudson Boyd and Kevin Comer were selected within the next couple of picks). 作者認為 Snell 為4~6輪貨,此PICK可優先選擇其他比Snell優秀的投手。 1-56: Kes Carter - (BA:51, MLB: -, DSS:61, MLBBB: -, PP: -) - OF He could become an average major league center fielder with good range and maybe even slightly above average power. He might be limited to a platoon role (not hitting lefties (yet)). While I'm in no way exstatic about this pick, I am okay with it. 1. 可成為MLB平均水準的CF,擁有好的守備範圍且有平均以上的長打能力。 2. 會被限制只能面對右投時上場(對左投打不好)。 1-59: Grayson Garvin - (BA:56, MLB: -, DSS:92, MLBBB:58, PP:66) - LHP Garvin will end up as a #4/#5 starter or a FB/CH bullpen guy. And while his upside is limited he is a fairly safe pick. Do I see why they took him? Yes. Do I like the pick? No, not enough upside. 1. 可能會成為4號或5號先發及RP,速球和變速球為主要武器。 2. 其潛力使得這個PICK選他是相當安全的。 1-60: James Harris Jr. - (BA: -, MLB: -, DSS:228, MLBBB: -, PP: -) - OF Every expert said that he likes this pick and I get it why (speed, potential. But, why didn't the same experts rank this player in their rankings, then? Nevertheless, I like such a pick more than the pick before. The Rays have to shoot for upside in order to compete in this devision. 作者說每個專家都表示喜歡其速度和潛力但為啥沒在他們的排行榜上? 儘管如此,他還是喜歡這個PICK多過前面。 2-75: Granden Goetzman - (BA:52, MLB: -, DSS:90, MLBBB:69, PP: -) - OF I take a potential five-tooler with above average power potential, especially when selected in the 2nd round. The 2nd day started off on the right foot with this pick. 擁有5工具和平均以上的長打潛力,尤其能在第2輪選上。 2-89: Lenny Linsky - (BA:81, MLB: -, DSS:120, MLBBB: -, PP: -) - RHP Next to no surefire power bats the Rays lack surefire back-end-of-the- bullpen guys in their farm system. Linsky could become just that with his FB/SL combination. Normally I don't agree with a RP that early but with the abundance of early picks I am okay with it. Linsky 補強了農場最缺乏的牛棚新秀,正常來說他不同意用這麼前面的PICK選1個 RP,但因其潛力認為這樣做是OK的(Linsky 擁有好的速球及滑球)。 3-119: Johnny Eierman - (BA:84, MLB: -, DSS:51, MLBBB:77, PP:73) - OF Long swing, above average power potential and bat speed, athletic. While not a finished product I like his ceiling. He is one of my favorite Rays picks this year. Good value for the 3rd round. No ranking board had him lower than 84. 1. 漂亮的揮棒姿勢和速度、擁有平均以上的長打實力、健壯的身體。 2. 作者相當喜歡其潛力且今年最喜歡 Eierman 這個PICK。 今天先翻到這邊,有錯請指正原文連結上篇已有此篇就不再貼出。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.231.53.227 ※ 編輯: knoxvillt 來自: 61.231.53.227 (06/14 17:59)

06/14 20:00, , 1F
推 選誰都可以討論 在來就要看養成來證明眼光就是
06/14 20:00, 1F

06/14 20:07, , 2F
看到板大嘗試有置底 那建議有想負責的板友
06/14 20:07, 2F

06/14 20:08, , 3F
可以選擇自己想要翻的順位 我會努力翻完2輪-10輪
06/14 20:08, 3F

06/14 20:10, , 4F
如果有想幫忙翻 跟我提我在分出 希望單純一點^^"
06/14 20:10, 4F
※ 編輯: knoxvillt 來自: 61.231.53.227 (06/14 20:35)
文章代碼(AID): #1DzoTVQh (Rays)
文章代碼(AID): #1DzoTVQh (Rays)