Re: [外電] Rockets’ shooter, Aaron Brooks, has …

看板Rockets (休士頓火箭)作者Websphere (Just cruising)時間15年前 (2010/09/20 10:24)推噓12(12推 0噓 1→)

留言13則, 13人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)

就這樣沒頭沒腦的貼一篇文什麼都不說衝文章數嗎? @_@ 快速的大致幫你翻譯一下. ※ 引述《bank1000 (【人魔席迅】)》之銘言： : Rockets’ shooter, Aaron Brooks, has his defenders (he’s just not one of them : …a defender, I mean) : by connor winn : Nothing’s happening…nothing’s happening…something about a map. Nothing’s : happening…it’s over. A lot of people in the audience look pissed. – Brian : Griffin, Family Guy : Not a whole lot going on regarding the Rockets other than Luis Scola : dominating all but one game in the FIBA tournament. In nine games, Scola : scored below 20 once and above 30 five times. He lead the tournament in : scoring (ahead of the NBA’s new alpha dog) while shooting at the 5th highest : percentage from the field. Who is going to be the more impactful Rocket – : Luis Scola or Kevin Martin? Does this liberate Yao from a heavy burden on : the offensive end so he can concentrate primarily on defense? This is not : what I wanted to discuss. Scola在國際賽精采的表現引起大家的關注. 回頭想想, 揪竟是Scola還是Martin會成為火箭隊的要角呢? 姚明是否能夠藉由他們來減輕自己得分的壓力? 不過這些不是本文要探討的. : I did, rather, receive an email defending Aaron Brooks from a high school : buddy whom I had not seen since freshman year of college. You should know a : thing or two about this guy. First, we can call him Ben. Second, in high : school Ben was much smarter than me in terms of sheer I.Q. Subsequently, I : placed a good amount of value on his side of things during lunch-time : arguments. Because I know of no variable that has changed since then, I am : going to continue to give merit to Ben’s opinions. I am also going to hope : to high heaven Ben has not had any traumatic head injuries the past seven : years that would influence his recent email. : So Aaron Brooks has Ben in his corner? Perhaps, my stance on Brooks requires : a certain amount of reevaluation. I suppose it might be relevant to mention : that my brother really likes Aaron Brooks. Relevant, I conclude, because this : means that people who actually watch Rockets’ games enjoy having Brooks on : the team. 我從一個多年不見的同學那收到了一封email, 他是來挺我們家小AB的. 有關於這個傢伙, 我們就叫他Ben吧. 在學校的時期這傢伙的IQ比我高上許多. 希望他不是因為發生過什麼事故把頭腦撞壞了才發這封信給我. Ben看起來似乎是小AB的粉絲. 小AB在我看來還有很多需要好好評估的, : Let me say first, I did not have the opportunity to watch many Rockets’ : games last season. I lived well outside the range of Fox Sports SW, and the : club was never shown on national television. I was relegated to the “box : score,” and I use that term to encapsulate any modern statistic of my : choosing. 其實我上個球季並沒有太多機會看到火箭隊的比賽. 我只能用一些統計的數字來做一些觀察與判斷. : I now know I have been prejudiced in my view of Brooks. Living by the box : score, I have fit Brooks into a mold and have not allowed him to show me : otherwise. For this I look forward to the season upcoming. It will provide an : opportunity to evaluate my blind evaluation of a player. 我知道我自己對小AB有些成見. 不過我期待新球季的來臨, 這讓我有機會重新評估這個小後衛. : Last season this is what I saw: Brooks was only 43.2% from the field, 36th : amongst guards (qualified). Of the entire league, which averaged 46.1%, : Brooks was 101st. His True Shooting Percentage (which I value) was 54.9%, : according to hoopsdata.com. The 20th ranked TSP was Al Horford’s 59.4%. : For more perspective, let us compare a notoriously horrid shooter with : Brooks. Step on down, Rajon Rondo!!! 上個球季我看到的是, 只有43.2%命中率, 後衛排名36(還算及格). 整個聯盟排名101. 真正有意義命中率(我個人認為)是54.9% (從hoopsdata.com得到的數據) 讓我們拿一個外線爛到出名的後衛來跟小AB較量一下~ Rondo該你上場啦! : If you do not follow the NBA (insert joke here…i.e. “you’re leading a more : fulfilling life because you follow politics”), Rondo’s aim is bad. Last : season he made 31.7% of his shots outside 10 feet. He was able to compile an : overall FG% of 50.8% (excellent for a guard) because over half of his 11.4 : field goal attempts per game came within 10 feet (with 5.4 at the rim). Rondo的外線是眾所皆知的爛. 上個球季在十呎之外的命中率是31.7%, 不過他全體的命中率竟然有到50.8% (很棒) 因為他超過一半的投籃都是在近距離(平均在5.4呎之內) : Stir in Rondo’s 62.1 free throw percentage, and you get a TSP of 54.0. We : can see that Aaron Brooks has scoring efficiency percentages that are : comparable to someone who is known as a bad shooter. Am I comparing cat poop : to dog poop? Maybe, but either way, something stinks. Rondo的罰球只有六成二, 不過他的"有意義的命中率"卻有五成四. 拿我們家小AB來與Rondo相比或許就像____比雞腿, 不過這某些東西是可以觀察出一些端倪. : Brooks shot 45.4% on 2-point field goals last season. That is good for 108th : out of 119 qualified players. He did shoot 39.8% from beyond the arc, ranking : 19th last season. Combined with his 82.2% clip at the stripe (40th in the : league), we can account for the buoyant force in his true shooting : percentage, which is hardly seaworthy. 上季小AB的兩分球是45.4%,三分線外有39.8%. 罰球線有82.2%. (最後一句看不懂orz) : I am not disparaging Aaron Brooks. He appears to be a great guy, and perhaps, : the Rockets value him as such. What he does on the court, he does well. : Knowingly operating as an outside threat, Brooks took 6.5 three pointers last : year and made 2.4 of them. Brooks’ scoring efficiency is, thusly, predicated : on the 3-ball. With the arrival and emergence of shooters Kevin Martin and : Chase Buddinger, respectively, do the Rockets need place such high premium on : outside shooting from the point guard spot? If that skill is found elsewhere : in the rotation, is there a skill the Rockets lack that can be filled at the : 1-spot? Does this make Brooks expendable? : Maybe not. 我不是在幹焦小AB. 他看起來會是一個偉大的球員, 而火箭隊或許也是這樣期待他的. 小AB在外線是個威脅, 平均每場會丟6.5個三分球, 能夠投進2.4個. 不過陣容中有著Martin與布丁狗, 是否我們一號位需要如此旺盛的外線進攻慾望呢? : Ben was eager to point out: “by the second half of the season, his assists : were climbing and his scoring was fantastic, especially the 3. If he hadn’t : been passing to Trevor (Ariza) and Chuck (Hayes) all season, his assists may : have been around 7.5 or so, no?” Ben急著要說明的是, "在下半場的時候, 小AB的助攻數會上升而得分更是出色. 尤其是三分球. 如果他減少傳球給Ariza跟Hayes 他的助攻數會更好看." (碼的我笑了) : It is true that for the 31 games after the All-Star break, Brooks did average : one assist more than he had in the 51 games prior (4.9 v 5.9). And Ariza : (39.4% shooter) and Hayes (its bad, just trust me, the dude can’t shoot) are : not good at putting the ball through the hoop. Maybe Brooks could have : averaged more assists. 在全明星賽後的31場比賽小AB的確在助攻平均上有更佳的表現( 4.9與5.9) Ariza(39.4%)與Hayes(相信我,這老兄不懂投籃)也的確不擅長把球搞進籃框. 或許小AB真的應該不只有那些助攻數據. : But are assists really an important measure of an individual player’s value? : Much like RBIs (not “errors”) in baseball, assists are completely dependent : on another player’s performance in a given play. I would rather see a : statistic that quantifies the amount of “Demonstrably Easy and Not Nasty : Instances for Shooting ” (or D.E.N.N.I.S. System) Brooks was able to create. : How often was he able to pass the ball into the shooter’s pocket? By pocket : I refer to the area where a shooter can catch the ball and shoot in : stride/rhythm. If Brooks drives and kicks out to Shane Battier for a corner : three, but the pass is at Battier’s feet: that cannot be considered a : D.E.N.N.I.S. 不過助攻數真的是衡量一個球員的最佳數據? 就像棒球的RBI, 助攻數在不同的球員之中是獨立的關係. 我倒寧願看到的是他能不能把球舒服的交到隊友手上, 我指的是能夠讓隊友順暢的投籃. 就算小AB把球傳到外線給大空檔的Battier, 但傳球的位置卻在腳的地方, 這就不能算是一個好傳球. : In that scenario, Battier has had to do most of the work by gathering himself : for a shot. Besides allowing time for a defensive rotation, the act of having : to catch an errant pass and initiate a shot is antithetical to the meaning of : assist. In fact, such passes should be viewed as passing the conch, or burden : of responsibility. But if the pass hits Battier just above his hip on his : shooting-hand side and a good shot results from the pass itself, I credit : such a pass as a D.E.N.N.I.S. and as more valuable than an “assist”. 在這種情況, Battier需要費力去把球撿起來並做好投籃動作, 才能投射. 除了會讓防守者有充裕的時間之外, 花費的精神與體力在所謂的"助攻數"上面是無視的. 如果傳球能夠剛好到位, 傳到了Battier習慣的持球位置, 那麼結果會更佳. 我認為這種表現跟實際上賺到的助攻數來相比是更重要的. : Alas, I do not have such detailed information for Aaron Brooks, nor any other : player for that matter, and so you might consider the prior couple paragraphs : tangential. My point is that a simple assist is too broad a concept to be : weighed comparatively. I do not enjoy using it as means for differentiating : value, at least not on its own merit. 實際上我對於AB沒有太多深入的了解. 我想說的只是不要單單從助攻數來完全評斷一個球員. : Brooks’ value is as a scorer. He would be ideally suited coming off the : bench as a more versatile Eddie House-type. When he catches on fire, he can : score off iso’s, hand-offs, screens, etc. like he did on March 17th, 2009. : His 19.6 ppg last year will probably command more than his type of role : player is worth…I will get into that next time. AB最大的功用還是作為一個得分者. 他理想的腳色還是作為一個板凳暴徒, 就像是Eddie House那般, 他去年的19.6平均得分或許也說明了他的球員類型. : http://www.red94.net/rockets-shooter-aaron-brooks-defenders-thema-defender/3807/ -- 不太知道你轉這篇的用意, 其實也沒什麼內容, 只是想描述小AB不太適合打PG而已. 就算不翻譯也說明一下你的感想之類的會比較好吧. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.115.131.20 ※ 編輯: Websphere 來自: 59.115.131.20 (09/20 10:26)