[外電] 拼的是他們，錯的是我（上）

看板Sixers (費城76人隊)作者hanway (紗之器)時間16年前 (2009/12/02 00:30)推噓16(16推 0噓 10→)

留言26則, 15人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)

http://0rz.tw/bJOip A For Effort, F For Me 拼的是他們，輸的是我 By Brian on December 1, 2009 1:51 AM I came to a startling realization tonight as I was laughing this loss off over dinner with my wife. She asked me why I was laughing when in the past I've basically been catatonic after a game like this. I thought about it for a second and then the reason hit me, it's because I never, ever, not for one single second got caught up in their fourth quarter run. I never believed they'd win the game, not even when they scratched and clawed their way back to tie it at 102. It was a sad moment, definitely the low point for me since I started this blog and I'll explain how I got here after the jump. 今天的晚餐桌上，一記當頭棒喝。我跟老婆大人笑著說又輸球了，她問我怎麼這麼開心？畢竟以前碰到這種輸球方式，我總是黯然失魂搥心肝。想了一陣，理由突然在腦中浮現--因為整個第四節的追分大反攻過程裡，我完全置身事外，一秒鐘都沒有跟著嗨起來。即使是球員們浴血奮戰、102-102追平比數的那一刻，我也不相信他們會贏。真是悲哀的覺悟啊，絕對是這個部落格開張以來，我球迷生涯的最低點。怎麼會落魄至此，容我在跳轉後說明。 The answer is simple, Eddie Jordan is a pitiful coach. Horrible, in fact. He makes asinine decisions and baffling comments. If you asked him what color the sky is, he'd say green (Willie Green). Time and time again he's put horrible lineups on the floor, depended on borderline NBADL players for big minutes and benched the only players on his roster capable of turning things around. I hold him accountable for all of this and more. He's taken a Sixers roster that was competitive in the league and turned them into the New York Knicks in less than 20 games. This is a list of his failures. My failure is that I let what Jordan has done to the team as a whole affect my belief in the guys who actually wear the jerseys. 答案非常簡單，Eddie Jordan 是個爛教練。應該說，爛到可怕。球場上沒帶腦筋，球場下更是亂放炮。如果你問他天空是什麼顏色？他會說綠色（他愛小綠）。他一而再再而三，派出奇怪的陣容組合，讓連NBDL都打不好的球員大量上場，而最有能力扭轉局面的人，卻只能坐冷板凳。在我心中，他的罪狀還不只如此。上季曾經在聯盟中打出競爭力的這支七六人，只給他不到20場比賽的時間，就成了紐約尼克的分身。這些全都是他的錯。而我的錯呢？就是讓達叔對這支球隊做的一切，動搖了我對真正在打球的人的信心。 If you've followed this blog for more than a week or two, you realize that I've always been more glass half full than half empty, and that's a tremendous understatement. I let Eddie Jordan break my will and that's unforgivable. To be honest, Ed Stefanski had a big hand in this as well, with the whole Allen Iverson fiasco and his decision to hire Jordan in the first place. I shouldn't have spent the fourth quarter expecting the other shoe to drop because the fourth quarter wasn't about Jordan. When it got to that point (down 9 with 2:30 remaining), Jordan couldn't do anything about what was happening on the floor. He put his small lineup in, but Iguodala, Dalembert and Thad were out there and they had something to say about how this game was going to end. The Princeton offense was abandoned, the passive, over-helping defense was gone as well. It was simply athletes on the floor, dare I say, getting after it in a way that Eddie Jordan neither understands nor condones. They pressured the ball mercilessly, they trapped, they did everything they could to suffocate Dallas, get stops and get turnovers. 如果這一兩個禮拜以來，你有在看我的部落格，你應該知道我是個寧願樂觀以對，也不願悲觀放棄的人（這還是非常保守的說法）。但我竟然讓達叔摧毀了我的意志，真是不可原諒。老實說，今天這個局面，Ed Stefanski也有很大的責任，包括提起重簽AI的可能性，和最初的原罪--雇用達叔執掌七六人。看第四節比賽的時候，我不該覺得一定會輸，因為第四節跟達叔毫無關係。當比賽來到勝負關頭（剩2分30秒，落後9分），達叔也無力左右球場上的一切了。他把他最愛的小球部隊放在場上，但小AI、大懶伯和小羊，他們以行動在球場上宣示--比賽沒這麼容易結束！進攻時看不到普林斯頓，防守時也不再被動又過度補防。情況變得很簡單，這群運動員用生命打好每一球，而這是達叔不能理解也不容發生的。他們發狠壓迫、陷阱包夾、用盡一切方式掐緊達拉斯的牛鼻子，一遍遍地守住陣地、製造失誤。 On offense, they used dribble penetration instead of pointless dribble hand-offs thirty feet from the hoop to get good looks for each other and instead of contested 20-foot jumpers they got layups and wide-open threes. It was more playground than chalk board and it was good for a 12-3 run to tie the game. I should've been up on my feet for it, but instead I was stuck in the Eddie Jordan vortex, expecting every made shot to be met by a made shot by Dallas because, let's face it folks, that's just exciting basketball. The players deserved more from me tonight as a fan, not that it matters to them, but it matters to me. 進攻端，他們大膽切入，互相製造空間，而不是在距離籃框30呎的地方，搞"運球面交"（dribble handoff，運球到傳球對象旁，直接伸手給球），結果是一次次的上籃和空檔三分球，而不是在20呎外，從防守球員的指縫間射飛鏢。丟下戰術本，拿起街頭教條的結果，就是一波12-3的攻勢，追平比賽。這時候，我應該站起來興奮大叫，但達叔效應卻把我鎖在椅子上，每次七六人進球，我就覺得小牛也會投進。也難怪啦，畢竟這才是好看的籃球賽，是吧？身為球迷，今天的球隊表現值得我喝采，當然對電視上的他們沒差，但我得向自己交代。 Anyway, the point is I'm going to try harder to separate my loathing of the brace-licker from my feelings about the team. They didn't choose their coach, they didn't choose this idiotic system on both ends of the floor and I think they've finally said enough is enough among themselves. All they can do is go out there and bust their asses every night to win basketball games, and that's exactly what they've been doing. 總之重點是，對達叔的恨意和對球隊的觀感，我必須更努力分清楚。這爛教練不是他們選的，這鳥戰術更不是他們挑的。我想，他們在私底下恐怕也已經受夠了。而唯一能做的，就是每晚上場燃燒自己求勝，而這場比賽就是最好的例子。 Here's a look at your rotations and a fun split to follow: 下面是本場比賽的陣容調度表，還有一項有趣的數據: （見:http://0rz.tw/byZqm，有比賽每一節開始(12:00)到結束的場上五人） In case his boneheaded play that may or may not have cost the Sixers the game (I think the shot was long, and I'll never admit otherwise), Sam Dalembert is the main reason the Sixers were even within striking distance in the fourth quarter. Over the past two games, Sam has played 67 minutes, grabbed 33 rebounds, blocked 6 shots, swiped 4 steals, and dished 4 dimes. That's domination. He was especially effective in the fourth quarter of both games. This made me think back to the effect Dalembert had on the two Nets games in the fourth, which led me to wonder exactly how good the team had been with Dalembert on the floor for the final 12 minutes. Check out these splits: 不論他不經大腦的補籃是否讓七六人輸掉比賽（我覺得小AI那球太長了，這是我的解讀），七六人之所以能夠在第四節追上馬刺，主要功臣就是大懶伯先生。過去兩場比賽，他上場67分鐘、抓了33個籃板、搧了6客火鍋、搶下6記抄截、還送了4次助攻。這叫做制霸！尤其是在這兩場的第四節，他的成績單特別漂亮。這讓我想到之前兩次對上籃網，出現在第四節的"大懶伯效應"，左右比賽結果，更讓我進一步思索，每場比賽最後12分鐘，大懶伯在場上與否，到底有多大的影響呢？請看下面的對比式數據。 - The Sixers have played 216 minutes in the fourth quarter of games - They have scored 437 points in those 336 minutes. - They have allowed 458 points - Sam has played 69 fourth quarter minutes - With Sam on the floor they have scored 153 points (2.22 points/minute) - With Sam on the floor they have allowed 125 points (1.81 points/minute) - Sam has sat for 147 minutes in the fourth quarter - With Sam on the bench they have scored 284 points (1.70 points/minute) - With Sam on the bench they have allowed 333 points (2.00 points/minute) - Sam has only played in the fourth quarter in 10 of 16 games - Sam has only played more than 5 minutes in the fourth quarter in 6 of 16 games - 七六人本季至今所有比賽的第四節時間總和是216分鐘（18場比賽） - 這216分鐘（應該是216分鐘，336疑似誤植）裡，他們得了437分 - 這段時間裡，他們被得了458分 - 大懶伯本季至今的第四節上場時間總和是69分鐘 - 當大懶伯上場時，七六人得了153分（2.22分/分鐘） - 當大懶伯上場時，七六人被得了125分（1.81分/分鐘） - 大懶伯本季至今的第四節休息時間總和是147分鐘 - 當大懶伯下場時，七六人得了284分（1.70分/分鐘） - 當大懶伯下場時，七六人被得了333分（2.00分/分鐘） - 至今18場比賽中，大懶伯只有在其中10場的第四節上場過 - 至今18場比賽中，大懶伯只有在其中6場的第四節，上場超過5分鐘 Now, what conclusions can we draw from this? Well, the first one is obvious. Jordan has chosen to go without his best rebounder and shotblocker for the majority of the fourth quarter in 67% of the team's 18 games. Sam has played 32% of the team's fourth quarter minutes to this point of the season. Those are simply facts, I'll let you decide if they speak to Jordan choosing offense over defense. Of course, the offense has been much better in the fourth when Sam has been on the floor as well. If I had to guess, which I really don't because I've seen it with my own eyes, the reason is Sam's defense and offensive rebounding. He blocks shots to start breaks. He makes people miss shots to start breaks. He cleans the glass to start breaks. When he's on the bench, there is much less of this going on. Are these stats available to Coach Jordan? How could they not be? Does he use them? How could he and still choose "offense" over defense every single time? 好，我們能從中得到什麼結論？首先，很明顯的，達叔在七六人本季至今的18場比賽中，大部分時候（其實高達三分之二），不願在第四節派出全隊最好的籃板和火鍋手。大懶伯本季至今的第四節上場時間，只佔了全隊的32%。這是很簡單的數據，至於這是否代表在達叔心中，進攻>>>>>>>>>>防守，要由看官您來判斷。當然啦，當大懶伯在第四節上場時，進攻效率其實有提升喔。如果非得要我猜個原因--其實我真的不用猜，因為眼睛看到的比賽內容已經昭然若揭--那就是大懶伯的防守強度還有進攻籃板。他搧個火鍋，快攻就來了；他讓對手投不進，快攻就來了；他抓個防守籃板，快攻就來了。當他在場下納涼的時候，這些好事發生的機率就會下降許多。達叔大大，他手上有這些數據嗎？怎麼可能沒有？那，他會加以應用嗎？怎麼可能用了，還是每次都犧牲防守來成就「進攻」呢？（上） == 我想，這一季看到現在，很多人都對七六人很失望，卻又不知道問題在哪。我到現在只看了今天這場比賽的第四節最後五分鐘。但這位認真的美國鄉民，是每場比賽都會看（現場/轉播/電視盒），而且會同時紀錄調度情形和特殊狀況的認真寫手。不可否認，他的文章也只代表他的觀點，但還是可以當成一個參考。我幾乎每場比賽完都會去看他的部落格，因為他每天寫七六人的文章數平均超過一篇，比費城報紙還多，而且不是廢話。我把本季至今的問題統整一下： 1. 防守：還記得上一季三分線老是被射到爆嗎？現在不但沒改，還多了容易被後衛切入，還有太過積極補防，容易露空檔給對方的情形。而根本原因是：達叔顯然不重視防守。他不會因為某人一直被吃而換更好的防守球員上來。另外，就團隊防守來說，去年平均每面對一百波進攻，失分是108分，每發動一百波進攻，得分也是108分（平均至個位數）。但今年不一樣囉！平均每面對一百波，失分是111分，每發動一百波進攻，得分是106分。換句話說，進攻效率跟防守效率都比去年差。（那相對全聯盟來說，每面對一百波進攻掉111分，到底好還是不好？提供個數據：勇士隊的這項數據，平均掉110分。） 2. 小球：達叔顯然很愛小球陣容。這場比賽是個例子，賽前Brand已經表示可以健康上場，而最後也繳出20-10的成績。但一開始Brand就被打入板凳，最後也只上場2X分鐘。取而代之的，是小綠-小祖-小AI-小羊-大懶伯的小球陣容。小球的問題在哪？打過球的都知道，內線防守空虛，籃板拿不下來。你說那金州勇士還不是一大四小。請問我們有他們的火力嗎？再者，他們的戰績...。 -- 歡迎強者繼續補充，本版需要更多的討論。另，這篇外電的下半明天再翻，實在太長了啊。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.109.224.28

推

boy790719

12/02 00:37, , 1^F

12/02 00:37, 1^F

推

II33

12/02 00:44, , 2^F

12/02 00:44, 2^F

推

arkod

12/02 00:51, , 3^F

12/02 00:51, 3^F