Wickmayer被禁賽一年

看板Tennis (網球)作者 (阿更)時間16年前 (2009/11/06 11:43), 編輯推噓19(19019)
留言38則, 10人參與, 最新討論串1/4 (看更多)
比利時禁藥法庭指Wickmayer在過去一年半內, 在三次被要求藥檢情況下未有向有關官員報告她的行蹤, 因此被禁賽一年。 不過Wickmayer已表明她一定會上訴,也說自己從沒缺席藥檢, 每次結果也是陰性; ITF和WTA暫時對此事件都沒有作出評論。 BRUSSELS (AP)—U.S. Open semifinalist Yanina Wickmayer was suspended for one year by a Belgian anti-doping tribunal Thursday, accused of failing to report her whereabouts to drug-testing officials three times. The Flemish regional tribunal called the punishment “reasonable.” Tribunal spokesman Koen Uman said the suspension takes immediate effect, but Wickmayer can appeal the decision. The 18th-ranked Belgian has denied any wrongdoing and said on her Web site she planned to appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. She is playing in a tournament in Bali this week. Another Belgian tennis player, 2002 Wimbledon semifinalist Xavier Malisse, also was suspended by the tribunal for breaking the whereabouts rule. Wickmayer’s suspension came as a surprise, because a prosecutor recommended she receive only a warning for missing three tests over 18 months. The tribunal said Wickmayer’s failure to live up to anti-doping rules required a suspension. Wickmayer said last month she has had trouble with her password in the computerized system overseen by the World Anti-Doping Agency. She also said registered mail at her home could not be signed off on because she was traveling to WTA tournaments. She has insisted she never missed an anti-doping test and her samples were always negative. Wickmayer has enjoyed a breakthrough year, including her run to the semifinals at the U.S. Open after never before moving past the second round at a Grand Slam tournament. She won her first two tour titles at Estoril in May and at Linz last month. The International Tennis Federation, which oversees the sport’s doping program, said Thursday it would not comment until receiving official notification of the suspension. The U.S. Tennis Association—which oversees the U.S. Open—declined comment, as did the WTA and ATP. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 125.31.26.23

11/06 12:08, , 1F
所以他Bali應該會被迫退出了? 今天好像不能上場
11/06 12:08, 1F

11/06 12:12, , 2F
如果是真的那也太過份了吧 又沒有驗出陽性 罰得卻比Gas重
11/06 12:12, 2F

11/06 12:14, , 3F
有上訴就代表還不是"終局判決",也就代表還不能立既執行
11/06 12:14, 3F

11/06 12:15, , 4F
按理應該還是可以出席Bali的比賽
11/06 12:15, 4F

11/06 12:18, , 5F
比利時報紙好像說他不會上場@@
11/06 12:18, 5F

11/06 12:34, , 6F
除非她自願放棄,不然她可以連禁藥法庭順便一起告。除了禁賽
11/06 12:34, 6F

11/06 12:37, , 7F
一年處份是否合理外,禁藥法庭做成因缺席三次而做成的"行政
11/06 12:37, 7F

11/06 12:40, , 8F
處份"及立刻執行是否有違背行政程序。按理,禁藥法庭是可以
11/06 12:40, 8F

11/06 12:42, , 9F
做出三次不到而"裁量"出的"行政處份",但沒理由立即強制執行
11/06 12:42, 9F

11/06 12:44, , 10F
新的藥檢規定好像的確是不能三次沒有報告行程沒錯
11/06 12:44, 10F

11/06 12:44, , 11F
不過立即執行倒是不太合情理
11/06 12:44, 11F

11/06 12:44, , 12F
在一般法庭,也是要經過三級三審給人民機會訴訟才能定驗讞
11/06 12:44, 12F

11/06 12:46, , 13F
在行政法庭也是要經過人民先訴願再經過行政法院訴訟才能形成
11/06 12:46, 13F

11/06 12:47, , 14F
最終判決,她說她會上訴,表示這審絕對不是最高審(最終審)
11/06 12:47, 14F

11/06 12:47, , 15F
當初Gas也是在上訴前就先停賽了吧? @@
11/06 12:47, 15F

11/06 12:51, , 16F
所以這些全都違法了阿。球員是可以依此提出訴訟的,這侵犯到
11/06 12:51, 16F

11/06 12:53, , 17F
他們的工作權,而且我記得Gas從被抓到到一審判到執行都有隔
11/06 12:53, 17F

11/06 12:54, , 18F
一段時間的
11/06 12:54, 18F

11/06 13:00, , 19F
所以依達晉級了??
11/06 13:00, 19F

11/06 13:00, , 20F
錯過3次藥檢的處罰本來就蠻重的,最高禁賽2年~
11/06 13:00, 20F

11/06 13:01, , 21F
Dushevina會遞補Wickmayer~
11/06 13:01, 21F

11/06 13:02, , 22F
但是我記得Gas當初是先禁賽,後來才進行審判的~
11/06 13:02, 22F

11/06 13:04, , 23F
然後判決出來的禁賽期限,剛好跟當時Gas已經禁賽的時間一樣
11/06 13:04, 23F

11/06 13:05, , 24F
因此比利時還是維持雙姝 要三姝要等至少一年........
11/06 13:05, 24F

11/06 13:10, , 25F
不過官網上面的賽程還是Wickmayer~
11/06 13:10, 25F

11/06 13:47, , 26F
這已經違反了"法律無罪推定"的原則,在最終審判決確定前,任
11/06 13:47, 26F

11/06 13:50, , 27F
何人應該視為無罪
11/06 13:50, 27F

11/06 13:55, , 28F
起源來自於德國法學法典
11/06 13:55, 28F

11/06 14:03, , 29F
這些細節我都不懂,我只覺得GAS脫罪的理由很扯就是
11/06 14:03, 29F

11/06 14:07, , 30F
而且萬一高審判出來的期限比一審短怎麼辦? 譬如 一審判一年
11/06 14:07, 30F

11/06 14:08, , 31F
半,二審判一年,結果當事人已經執行一年半之後突然二審宣布
11/06 14:08, 31F

11/06 14:09, , 32F
只有一年,那多出來執行的半年對當事人不就哭死,也就是對當
11/06 14:09, 32F

11/06 14:09, , 33F
事人不利益
11/06 14:09, 33F

11/06 15:59, , 34F
若是行政強制執行,那麼上訴並不影響執行...
11/06 15:59, 34F

11/06 16:09, , 35F
問題出在"禁藥法庭"已經不是單純的行政機關,它具有審判功能
11/06 16:09, 35F

11/06 16:43, , 36F
WTA官網賽程 * Dushevina replaces Wickmayer
11/06 16:43, 36F

11/06 16:43, , 37F
(voluntary withdrawal)
11/06 16:43, 37F

11/06 17:15, , 38F
C組無論最後一場結果如何,還是由伊達公子晉級
11/06 17:15, 38F
文章代碼(AID): #1AyvjEEY (Tennis)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1AyvjEEY (Tennis)