[外電] A year later, trade with Celtics loo …
※ 引述《jerod (KG4MVP)》之銘言:
: http://www.startribune.com/511/story/961068.html
: Today is more than the midpoint of the Wolves' 82-game schedule. It also is
: the one-year anniversary of the trade with Boston that transformed both teams
: in appearance and style, if not necessarily in results. Since the deal, the
: Wolves are 34-49. The Celtics, 28-53.
灰狼的今年球季已經走完一半了。
今天剛好是去年與波士頓交易的週年紀念日(XD)
在那個交易之後,灰狼的戰績為34勝49負,而特爾提克是28勝53負。
: Kevin McHale, Wolves vice president of basketball operations, has taken a
: fair amount of grief from media and fans for his personnel moves, including
: this one. But how does it look one year later? Let's break it down:
去年許多媒體與球迷對Kevin McHale(灰狼籃球執行副總裁)
所做的人事異動感到難過,這當然包括了那次交易。
但一年之後那次的交易看起來又如何呢??
我們來看看:
: Wally Szczerbiak's injury history is a factor; he has played 24 games and
: half as many minutes this season as Davis. Chemistry between Szczerbiak and
: Kevin Garnett also was an issue. Granted, Wally never would have pulled a
: stunt like Davis did last Friday, walking off the floor in the third quarter.
: But Szczerbiak's contract runs two full seasons after this one, worth another
: $25 million. Davis' deal ends after he makes $6.8 million in 2007-08. Factor
: in his ability to create, pass and, when focused, defend, and the Wolves look
: OK here.
: Edge: Wolves.
Ricky Davis vs. Wally Szczerbiak
Wally Szczerbiak的傷痛史是個不確定因素,
他本季打了24場球賽,上場時間是Davis的一半。
Szczerbiak與KG間的化學效應也是個問題。
可是Wally從不會做出Davis在上禮拜五的驚人舉動,在第三節逕自提早離場。
在那交易之後,Wally的合約還有整整兩年,2500萬美金。
Davis的合約則於2007-08到期,680萬美金。
無論在創造力,傳球,專注力,防守上來說,
這兩人交易的結果對灰狼來說是OK的。
得利:灰狼
: On the court, this is a blowout. Olowokandi was a bust, his only remaining
: value based on a contract that would have come off Minnesota's books. But
: then, the Wolves still would have needed a center and likely would have used
: the salary freed up (and more) to find one. Would McHale have found one who
: would be playing better right now than Blount? Unlikely.
: Edge: Wolves.
Mark Blount vs. Michael Olowokandi
禁區的大缺口。
Olowokandi是個廢,他的剩餘價值只在他的合約上。
但灰狼需要利用薪資空間來補一個中鋒。
McHale那時候找的到比現在的Blount打的更好的中鋒嗎? 應該沒這號人物。
得利:灰狼
: With Marcus Banks found wanting after a half-season as a solution at point
: guard -- and signed away by Phoenix anyway -- we've lumped most of what's
: left of the deal into this matchup. (Dwayne Jones for two second-round picks?
: Yawn.) Obviously, head-to-head, the potential of the first-round pick wins.
: But could the Wolves have gotten the deal done by only giving up Szczerbiak
: and Olowokandi for Davis, Blount and Reed? Long shot.
: Edge: Celtics.
Justin Reed vs. future first-round pick(未來第一輪選秀權)
明顯的,第一輪選秀權的潛力看起來是贏了。
但灰狼僅靠Szczerbiak,Olowokandi就能換到Davis,Blount跟Reed?
那第一輪選秀權將選到誰? 這需要更多時間證明
得利:塞爾提克
(這段翻的很鳥....主要是因為我沒注意那時的交易...對不起誰能幫我補充 0.0 )
: The disparity in salaries swapped that day generated a $4.2 million trade
: exception that, by NBA rules, expires today. The Wolves have had it available
: for a year. But remember, a deal would turn pretend salary into real money.
: And with Minnesota estimated to be at or over the luxury-tax threshold, any
: player coming in would cost the club double -- his salary, plus an equal
: amount in tax. It could be swapped for a draft pick.
: Edge: Neither.
$4.2 million trade exception 420萬現金轉移
當時薪資不對等的這項交易,造成了這420萬現金轉移的存在必須性。
但請記住,交易使你付錢,但也很可能為球隊生財。
明尼蘇達預測會超出薪資上限,所以任何加入的球員,對於灰狼來說,
其薪資都將因豪華稅成為兩倍。
得利: 差不多
: VERDICT
: One might wonder about the "opportunity cost" of this deal -- could Wally and
: Kandi have been swapped for something better? -- but it seems doubtful. Even
: if you weigh Blount against the pick, would Minnesota draft a center ready to
: average 13.1 points and 6.6 rebounds? A final way to judge it would be to
: say, would the Wolves willingly reverse the deal today? Don't think so.
: Edge: Wolves.
結論
有人可能對這個交易的"機會成本"有興趣,(註:機會成本是我亂翻的XD)
-- Wally跟糖果人有可能變更好嗎? -- 但這令人懷疑。
即便你拿Blount來做比較,
你有可能馬上用第一輪選進一個平均13.1分6.6籃板的即戰力中鋒嗎?
最後一項利於論斷此交易的方式是,
今天灰狼願不願意把這個交易倒轉回來再交易一次呢?
大概不會吧!!
得利者: 灰狼
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 124.8.38.215
推
01/27 07:54, , 1F
01/27 07:54, 1F
推
01/27 10:15, , 2F
01/27 10:15, 2F
→
01/27 10:17, , 3F
01/27 10:17, 3F
推
01/27 10:47, , 4F
01/27 10:47, 4F
推
01/27 11:01, , 5F
01/27 11:01, 5F
推
01/27 12:37, , 6F
01/27 12:37, 6F
Timberwolves 近期熱門文章
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章