[外電] Would you bid for Brandon Roy?

看板Timberwolves (明尼蘇達灰狼)作者sato111 (Zenko)時間14年前 (2011/11/29 20:31)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串1/1

http://www.startribune.com/sports/wolves/blogs/On_the_Wolves.html New CBA's Amnesty Clause: Would you bid for Brandon Roy? How much would you pay to finally make Brandon Roy a Timberwolf? Or would you at all? 無論變得如何，如果再有一次機會，那麼你還願意為他付出多少? Would you still be willing to take a chance on those bone-on-bone knees that have made him just a portion of the player he once was but still allowed him to wow for one quarter in last spring's playoffs? The new labor agreement that the owners and players continue to work out, but there's a clause in there -- see the deal's summary provided by SI.com's Sam Amick here -- that will prevent the Heat and the Lakers and the Bulls, etc., from scooping up handfuls of veterans let go by other teams for the mere veteran's minimum. Instead, there will be a modified waiver process that will allow teams under the salary cap to place competing bids for part but not all of any player released through that amnesty provision. That list of players could include Gilbert Arenas, Rashard Lewis, Baron Davis, Brendan Haywood, Richard Jefferson, Ron Artest and yes Roy, who, as Wolves fans will never forget, was drafted by the Wolves but traded for Randy Foye on draft night in 2006. 很可能因為特赦條款而揮別母球隊的球員Gilbert Arenas、Rashard Lewis、 Baron Davis、Brendan Haywood、Richard Jefferson、Ron Artest與Brandon Roy。 The Wolves' doctors at the time were alarmed by Roy's knees. They were right: Those kness now leave Roy unworthy of that 5-year, $82 million contract extension he signed in 2009. But is the three-time All Star worth a roll of the dice at, say, $3-4 million a year for the next three years? He fits one of the team's great needs: A ball-handling 2 guard, which they now sorely lack 灰狼的醫療團隊對他的膝蓋狀況感到驚訝，或許他們的認為是對的，也許他並不值得那 5年82million的合約，但至少他帶領拓荒者打出了好成績也3次入選了明星賽，即使他真的到了被迫要離開球隊，就憑這些成績加上在雙衛都能處理球的能耐，以一年$3-4million 去簽下3年合約可能是個不錯的抉擇。 spring -- the kind of game-changing player with the ball in his hands late in games. His knees might be 57, but the rest of him is only 27 and the kind of guy you'd want in your locker room (unless he fails to come to the realization that he's not the player he once was). 去年季後賽雖然拖著膝蓋上陣對抗，卻用手中的球撬出了幾場好比賽，就以這樣的狀況，許多球隊的大門還是願意為他敞開的。 If the Blazers indeed do release Roy -- owner Paul Allen certainly doesn't need the money, but it'd help him re-sign restricted free agent Greg Oden -- the Wolves at least will have an inside, informed opinion: New assistant coach Bill Bayno has seen both the old and the current Brandon Roy. Bayno, just hired away from the Blazers, has seen Roy play every night since Roy came into the league. 對拓荒者隊老闆來說確實不會在薪資空間上多所琢磨，不過與Roy道別對重新簽下Oden只有好處不會有太多壞處，再著，從拓荒者隊過來的助理教練Bill Bayno 可是一路看著他的球員生涯過程，所以他很清楚他現在的狀況。 On the other side of the amnesty coin... Will the Wolves use their one-time-only option to pay off a player's contract and have that number come off their salary cap. Fans on Twitter have thrown out questions to me about whether the Wolves will do so with everybody from Michael Beasley and Martell Webster to Darko! and Brad Miller. Beasley? Certainly not. Darko!: I can't see Glen Taylor writing a check for $12 million-plus after just one season when they could create the same cap room by paying Miller -- who knows Adelman's system and is a needed veteran presence, but doesn't have much left in him on that surgically repaired knee -- less than $6 million for the next two years. 灰狼支持者問到特赦其中之一的可能性...... Beasley?機率非常之低。 Darko?你忍心看到灰狼隊老闆開出一張$12 million左右的免費支票嗎? Adelman的系統很喜歡有經驗的球員，因此Roy存在是有好處的，用兩年$6 million 或更低的合約去獲得可能是個好投資。 All 30 NBA teams can use the amnesty clause, but each can only use it once during this new labor deal and they can only use it for a player now currently on their roster. 特赦──只有一次機會 My hunch: Perhaps only if they can use that money for sure to sign an impact player. Might Roy qualify? What do you think? Would you roll the proverbial dice? And would you use the amnesty provision now to waive Miller or Darko! or Beasley (or whoever)? Feel free to chime in... 誰是決定性的關鍵? 誰是該爭取的球員? 誰是該赦釋的球員? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 182.235.46.247 ※ 編輯: sato111 來自: 182.235.46.247 (11/29 20:35)