Charley Rosen on Jazz

看板UTAH-JAZZ (猶他 爵士)作者 (AmmOn)時間19年前 (2006/12/06 23:14), 編輯推噓20(20012)
留言32則, 15人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/6185106 Posted: 17 days ago As you usually do with the teams you cover, I think you had the technicalities of Utah's offense and defense down to a 'T'. But I happened to watch the Jazz play the Bucks on the following night and it seems to me that Utah's success depends on how much rough play they can get away with. In the pursuit of rebounds and loose balls, they seem to push and shove and generally maim their opponents more than any other team in the league. If the refs continue to let them operate in this fashion, then the Jazz will continue to win. But I don't see this happening all year. ─ James, Milwaukee First off, it's no surprise that a team coached by Jerry Sloan would resort to physical tactics. As a player, Sloan was even rougher than Bruce Bowen. Secondly, Utah's starting power players are Carlos Boozer and Mehmet Okur, both of whom lack the quickness and fluid skills of most of their peers. Put Matt Harpring, Derek Fisher and Jarron Collins in the same bang-or-find-other -work category. If all things were indeed equal, these guys would be in foul trouble starting from the opening tip. Thirdly, knowing Sloan as well as they do (his 21 years in the command seat is second only to Pat Riley's 23 seasons), and knowing that his players must be physically aggressive in order to compete, the refs tend to let the Jazz do what they have to do. Lastly, players who initiate physical contact on a nightly basis are usually vulnerable to suffering injuries themselves, as has been the case with Boozer and Harpring. So, you might well be correct in assuming that the Jazz will eventually be bludgeoned by their own necessary brutalities. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.41.169.105 ※ 編輯: ammon 來自: 59.41.169.105 (12/06 23:18)

12/06 23:20, , 1F
兩三個禮拜前的東西, 看看他說的會不會成真吧 .
12/06 23:20, 1F

12/06 23:31, , 2F
12/06 23:31, 2F

12/06 23:45, , 3F
這篇大半篇幅的重點 就是在說爵士髒 = =
12/06 23:45, 3F

12/06 23:51, , 4F
爵士張?
12/06 23:51, 4F

12/06 23:56, , 5F
12/06 23:56, 5F

12/06 23:58, , 6F
叫他吃屎吧
12/06 23:58, 6F

12/07 00:04, , 7F
密爾瓦基的沾姆士先生信中說:爵士打得很粗暴,如果裁判尺度
12/07 00:04, 7F

12/07 00:05, , 8F
允許的話,那爵士將一直贏下去,但他不認為裁判會放任他們
12/07 00:05, 8F

12/07 00:07, , 9F
羅森先生的回應:
12/07 00:07, 9F

12/07 00:06, , 10F
裁判有放任過? 現在的尺度娘透了
12/07 00:06, 10F

12/07 00:07, , 11F
1. 史隆當球員的時候比包溫還粗暴
12/07 00:07, 11F

12/07 00:08, , 12F
2. 爵士大多球員速度不快,如果裁判公平,應該個個有犯規麻煩
12/07 00:08, 12F

12/07 00:10, , 13F
( 反正公鹿兩場都被我們做掉了 .. )
12/07 00:10, 13F

12/07 00:11, , 14F
套句JazzFanz上說的,如果籃球沒有一定的肢體碰撞,那不如去
12/07 00:11, 14F

12/07 00:11, , 15F
看網球或高爾夫
12/07 00:11, 15F

12/07 00:11, , 16F
記得很多場犯規的確是遙遙領先
12/07 00:11, 16F

12/07 00:13, , 17F
我們的確是近年來的犯規大隊啊..除了上季輸給尼克
12/07 00:13, 17F

12/07 01:05, , 18F
裁判對所謂的明星球員倒是有不少禮遇(ex. 酒蛋)
12/07 01:05, 18F

12/07 02:24, , 19F
大家好 我是戰績球迷 永遠支持聯盟最髒最爛的那支球隊
12/07 02:24, 19F

12/07 02:41, , 20F
12/07 02:41, 20F

12/07 04:16, , 21F
史龍比包叔髒 好文一篇
12/07 04:16, 21F

12/07 07:47, , 22F
As a player, Sloan was even rougher than Bruce Bowen.
12/07 07:47, 22F

12/07 08:40, , 23F
推:大家好 我是戰績球迷 永遠支持聯盟最髒最爛的那支球隊
12/07 08:40, 23F

12/07 08:44, , 24F
12/07 08:44, 24F

12/07 09:06, , 25F
果然戰績好這種言論又會陸續出現
12/07 09:06, 25F

12/07 10:26, , 26F
12/07 10:26, 26F

12/07 12:32, , 27F
骯髒度:rodman>stockton>malone>bowen>sloan...@@?
12/07 12:32, 27F

12/07 15:40, , 28F
Mutombo:你們把我放在哪裡?!
12/07 15:40, 28F

12/07 15:48, , 29F
Molone拍拍Boozer說:你被稱為拐子布的日子不遠了
12/07 15:48, 29F

12/07 15:53, , 30F
Boooooolone??
12/07 15:53, 30F

12/07 19:06, , 31F
骯髒度:rodman>stockton>malone>bowen>sloan>mutombo.@@?
12/07 19:06, 31F

12/07 23:50, , 32F
12/07 23:50, 32F
文章代碼(AID): #15TjuuIJ (UTAH-JAZZ)
文章代碼(AID): #15TjuuIJ (UTAH-JAZZ)