Re: [外電] Yep, Wang is definitely NOT an ace

看板CMWang (王建民 - 大樹哥)作者polishing (polishing)時間18年前 (2008/04/08 14:54)推噓11(11推 0噓 2→)

留言13則, 13人參與討論串3/3 (看更多)

※ 引述《wesun (統一獅王重返榮耀^^)》之銘言：這篇比較簡單，我想很多人都可以看得懂了，不過閒著沒事還是試翻一下... : 其實這位作者還有一篇 : 不過感覺他很喜歡我們的 : 小王就是了^^ : 大家可以幫我縮嗎 = =" : http://www.bugsandcranks.com/new-york-yankees/yep-wang-is-definitely-not-an-ace/ : Yeah, that Chien-Ming Wang is DEFINITELY not an ace. Nope. Definitely not a No. 1 guy who can match up with the game’s best starters and come out on top more often than not. 黑啦黑啦... 王確實不是一個王牌~ 絕對不是一個可以稱得上棒球比賽中的王牌，或是表現好比表現不好的時候多的高手 : Nope. No way. Hell, even catcher Jorge Posada said during the off-season that the Yankees should have made the Johan Santana trade because “we need a No. 1.” 不，絕對不是. 該死，甚至連隊上的捕手波沙達上個球季的季後後賽時都說，球隊應該把山塔那給弄過來，因為我們真的需要一個王牌. : Nope. Despite a major-league leading 38 wins in 2006 and 2007 and only 13 losses, he can’t get any respect. Not even from his own teammates. 甚至在2006跟2007共有著聯盟領先的38勝以及只有13敗的紀錄，都無法獲得尊敬，包括他的隊友. : I beg to differ. He isn’t a flashy strikeout pitcher or a talkative, attention-grabbing personality. He is just a groundball machine who gets deep in games and consistently and wins more often than just about every other starter in the game. 我希望能夠換個角度想想。王不是一個有著華麗三振能力的投手，也不是一個多話會容易引起注意的人。他不過就是個滾地球機器，比其他投手持續穩定的贏得比賽。 : An ace? I think so. Go ahead and name 10 starters in the major leagues who are CLEARLY better than Wang right now. And if you really want to go to the trouble, back up your argument with the numbers to prove it. 一個王牌? 我覺得是。不然馬上去試著列出十個你覺得確實比王好的投手，如果你真的要這麼做，麻煩順道列出數據來支持你的論點。 : I doubt you’ll be able to do that, conclusively. So, how do you make the argument that a guy who is undoubtedly one of the game’s 10 best starters is NOT an ace? I don’t think you can. 我很懷疑你可以辦得到。如果不行，那麼，你是又怎麼可以說出這位無疑是現在棒球比賽前十個最好的投手之一的王，不是一個所謂的王牌勒? : Wang (2-0) won again Sunday, throwing 6.1 shutout innings in a 2-0 victory over Tampa Bay. By the way, his opponent Sunday was James Shields — the best starter the Rays have. 王(2勝0負)再次的在星期日贏得比賽，投出了6.1局精采的好球擊敗坦帕灣，而他的對手是光芒隊陣中最好的投手James Shields耶。 : Oh, and his other victory this season? A 3-2 win over Toronto ace Roy Halladay, one of the game’s best pitchers, in which he pitched 7 excellent innings. 喔，對了，他的另外一勝是上次擊敗多倫多的王牌Roy Halladay，他也是現今最好的投手之一。在那場比賽，王投了七局的好球! : He can’t win big playoff games, the Wang bashers say. And yes, Wang was awful in the playoffs last season posting a 19.06 ERA in two brutal starts. Yes, he is 0-3 with a 7.58 ERA in three playoff starts. 有些就是看不慣王的人總是說"他無法贏得大比賽(季後賽)"。對啦，他季後賽整理表現的確很差。(有一些數據，不翻了...) : Wang was awful in last season’s playoffs. But, look a little closer at his 2005 and 2006 performances. As a rookie in 2005, he pitched 6.2 innngs in a loss to Anaheim, allowing just one run. In 2006, against Detroit, he again pitched 6.2 innings, this time allowing three runs. So, one of those outings was dominant, the other pretty good. 王上個季後賽表現糟透了，但是仔細看看，他2005以及2006作為一個菜鳥投手，卻在季後賽贏得兩場比賽喔~~ : He was bad last season, but don’t tell me he can’t pitch in the playoffs. He has shown that he can. 別跟我說他不能投季後賽，他早就已經證明過他可以了! : So, go right ahead and keep thinking Wang isn’t an ace. Some Yankee fans — and even players like Posada — might agree. I don’t care, and I don’t think Wang does either. 所以，繼續認為王不是洋基的王牌吧~~ 某些洋基的球迷，甚至球員如波沙達也會這樣認為，但我不在乎。我想王自己也不會在乎的。 : He is just going to keep pounding hitters with that sinker and, most importantly, winning games. Isn’t that what an ace does? 他只是持續不斷的用他的伸卡球攻擊打者，最重要的是，持續的贏得比賽，這不正是一個王牌在做的事情嗎? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.113.156.59