Re: Doc on Ray...

看板Celtics (波士頓 塞爾提克)作者 (馬不理不思議)時間13年前 (2012/08/03 00:25), 編輯推噓12(12044)
留言56則, 13人參與, 最新討論串4/4 (看更多)
http://tinyurl.com/cf3okfo 稍微完整一些的翻譯 Doc Rivers: Blame me, not Rondo Updated: August 1, 2012, 4:06 PM ET ESPNBoston.com Celtics coach Doc Rivers said he thought his decision-making was the primary reason why guard Ray Allen chose to sign with the Miami Heat over staying in Boston, not the veteran's deteriorating relationship with Rajon Rondo. 賽爾提克總教練 Doc Rivers 說他認為他的決定才是雷槍決定離去加入熱火的主因, 而不是因為這位老將跟 Rondo 關係惡化。 "People can use all the Rondo stuff -- and it was there, no doubt about that -- but it was me more than Rondo," Rivers told Yahoo! Sports in an interview conducted at the London Olympics, where the coach is working as an NBC analyst. "I'm the guy who gave Rondo the ball. I'm the guy who decided that Rondo needed to be more of the leader of the team. That doesn't mean guys liked that -- and Ray did not love that -- because Rondo now had the ball all the time. 「人們可以拿 Rondo 來說嘴,惡化的關係也確實存在,毫無疑問── 不過跟 Rondo 比起來我才是主因。 」 Rivers 在倫敦奧運擔任 NBC 分析員的訪問說到。 「我是那個授予 Rondo 持球的人,我是那個決定讓 Rondo 領導球隊的人。 這不代表所有人都接受──雷槍就不認同──因為現在球總是在 Rondo 手上。」 "Think about everything (Allen) said when he left, 'I want to be more of a part of the offense.' Everything was back at Rondo. And I look at that, and say, 'That's not Rondo's fault.' That's what I wanted Rondo to do, and that's what Rondo should've done." 「想想當雷槍離開的時候說了什麼『我想要成為進攻的一部份。』問題又繞回了 Rondo 身上。我看了看,我說『這不是 Rondo 的錯。』這就是我希望 Rondo 去做的,並且就也 是他應該完成的。」 Rivers also told Yahoo! that Allen was bothered by losing his starting job to Avery Bradley, but the coach said he didn't regret the decision to start Bradley because it was what was best for the team. Rivers 也跟 Y! 透露雷槍也為丟了先發而困擾, 不過教頭說她不後悔當初把先發位子給了 Avery Bradley ,因為這是當時對球隊最好的 決定。 Allen turned down Boston's two-year, $12 million offer to accept half that from the Heat, who could offer only a $3 million annual salary utilizing the taxpayer's mini-midlevel exception. Rivers questioned the notion that Allen will find a bigger role with the Heat. 雷槍拒絕的波士頓 12M/2y 的合約,而接受了每年只出的起3M中產特例的熱火。 (注:簽了兩年約6M/2y,所以等於是半價) Rivers 很懷疑雷槍能在熱火扮演更重要的角色。 "Ray's got to do what's best for Ray," Rivers told Yahoo! Sports. "But having said that, he's not going to start in Miami. And I doubt he gets the ball more. But I do think, for a guy like Ray and Paul (Pierce) and Kevin (Garnett) and Kobe (Bryant), it's easier to go somewhere and do that, than have it taken from you where you're at." 「雷槍得去做對他自己最好的事。」Rivers 跟 Y! Sports 說, 「不過還是得說,他不會在邁阿密先發的,而且我也懷疑他能拿到更多球。 不過我想,對超賽三巨頭和 Kobe 這類的人來說,拍拍屁股自己走會比待在原地看著自己 失去好過一些。」 Focusing on doing what's best for the team instead of worrying about how individual players feel allows him to "coach free," Rivers told Yahoo! Sports. "I always tell my guys: If I'm wrong, hopefully I'm smart enough, or my staff, or one of you guys -- because I do listen to you -- will tell me that I'm wrong," Rivers told Yahoo! Sports. "But not one player ever told me, 'Hey, I don't think you should start Avery.'" 專注在對球隊最好而非擔心個別球員的感覺讓 Rivers 得以更自在的教球。 「我總是跟我的球員說:如果我錯了,希望我夠聰明, 或是我的教練團或是你們其中之一會告訴我我錯了──因為我總是會傾聽。」 Rivers 告訴 Y! Sports 「不過沒有任何的球員告訴我『嘿!我覺得你不該讓 Avery Bradley 先發。』」 Rivers admitted to being initially "pissed" at Allen, not necessarily for choosing the Heat but for his reasons for not wanting to return to Boston. He added that he rationalized it soon after and since has moved on. Rivers 承認之前有酸雷槍根本不是非加入加入熱火不可,只是他不想回到波士頓罷了。 他補充說他之後很快的冷靜下來,日子總是要過。 source: http://tinyurl.com/cggv78n -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 36.225.140.45

08/03 00:31, , 1F
推翻譯! Doc非常會講話~
08/03 00:31, 1F

08/03 02:25, , 2F
Y!想成YI.. 害我納悶好久看原文才了XD
08/03 02:25, 2F

08/03 11:11, , 3F
其實真的讓小AB先發才打起來的啊..
08/03 11:11, 3F

08/03 11:46, , 4F
這次挫折會讓Doc有更多反省吧!!未來會更好(莫名正向
08/03 11:46, 4F

08/03 12:09, , 5F
雷槍加入熱火是讓賽迷最無法接受的一點啊
08/03 12:09, 5F

08/03 16:20, , 6F
推翻譯,也推河流~~
08/03 16:20, 6F

08/03 17:59, , 7F
其實滿中肯的 火火本身球就不夠分了 去那邊很難發威
08/03 17:59, 7F

08/03 20:14, , 8F
我看成yi
08/03 20:14, 8F

08/04 00:58, , 9F
雖然Ray的離開很可惜,也希望他有好的發展,但說實在
08/04 00:58, 9F

08/04 00:58, , 10F
Ray在火的功能恐怕只是出手更快更準的James Jones
08/04 00:58, 10F

08/04 00:59, , 11F
Spo會為了Ray去改變去年的奪冠體系嗎?我覺得很難
08/04 00:59, 11F

08/04 01:02, , 12F
不過,如果是做高樹的替補(偶而控球+冷箭)也許...
08/04 01:02, 12F

08/04 01:03, , 13F
但也要他的腳踝能夠應付敵對的PG or SG才成
08/04 01:03, 13F

08/04 01:32, , 14F
岔題一下 有外電說公鹿對皮丘有意思
08/04 01:32, 14F

08/04 02:05, , 15F
Spo最成功的戰術就是讓Big3自由發揮...
08/04 02:05, 15F

08/04 02:06, , 16F
非常合理,當你有Super Star在手上...每一個教練都
08/04 02:06, 16F

08/04 02:08, , 17F
是這樣做~Jackson(MJ/O'Neal/Kobe)、Doc(T-Mac/PP)
08/04 02:08, 17F

08/04 02:09, , 18F
最終比賽還是要靠球員..當球員能力愈強就愈不需要過
08/04 02:09, 18F

08/04 02:10, , 19F
多的戰術...像對上熱火就很明顯
08/04 02:10, 19F

08/04 02:11, , 20F
Spo在開頭感覺上總想打一些整体配合、變化...但是最
08/04 02:11, 20F

08/04 02:12, , 21F
後把C's打慘的還是把球給LBJ這招...
08/04 02:12, 21F

08/04 02:13, , 22F
而C's的GAP事實上已過了獨自頂起進攻的能力...
08/04 02:13, 22F

08/04 02:14, , 23F
Doc要求的戰術配合打法,反而是救了這些老兵們
08/04 02:14, 23F

08/04 02:16, , 24F
也讓C's在進攻火力不足的情況下還能維持高命中率...
08/04 02:16, 24F

08/04 02:17, , 25F
Ray其實也是受益人...而且績效和Rondo有正相關
08/04 02:17, 25F

08/04 02:18, , 26F
不確定Ray是否真的很想要長時間的持球...但過去Ray持
08/04 02:18, 26F

08/04 02:21, , 27F
球過長效果實在不怎樣...代打PG也是不行
08/04 02:21, 27F

08/04 02:21, , 28F
至於進攻的參與度是否過低?...我怎麼覺得只要Ray在場
08/04 02:21, 28F

08/04 02:23, , 29F
上,C's的半場攻勢幾乎都是先看Ray的空手跑位秀
08/04 02:23, 29F

08/04 02:24, , 30F
這樣還算參與度低嗎?...除非Ray自已厭煩當接球射手
08/04 02:24, 30F

08/04 02:26, , 31F
到了熱火可能連空手跑位這一段都可以省略了.待底線等
08/04 02:26, 31F

08/04 02:26, , 32F
LBJ/Wade單兵吸引包夾再傳出來還比較有效果...
08/04 02:26, 32F

08/04 02:32, , 33F
其實RAY對比賽的解讀方式是和RONDO和其他人不一樣的
08/04 02:32, 33F

08/04 02:33, , 34F
照DOC的說法 RONDO和PIERCE都是依直覺的人
08/04 02:33, 34F

08/04 02:34, , 35F
但RAY是完完全全思考型的人 非常理智
08/04 02:34, 35F

08/04 02:35, , 36F
RONDO在某方面確實是提升了RAY的進球效益
08/04 02:35, 36F

08/04 02:37, , 37F
不過RONDO的方式在RAY看來 不一定是合理的
08/04 02:37, 37F

08/04 02:41, , 38F
後期有時候會出現 他們兩個想給/要球的點不太一樣
08/04 02:41, 38F

08/04 02:44, , 39F
如果要說RAY在C's打球有什麼痛苦 除了打替補
08/04 02:44, 39F

08/04 02:46, , 40F
他和RONDO想法上的歧異 我還比較能理解
08/04 02:46, 40F

08/04 02:48, , 41F
什麼想更多自己持球或計較轉型接球射手
08/04 02:48, 41F

08/04 02:49, , 42F
我覺得RAY都不像那種格局的球員
08/04 02:49, 42F

08/04 02:52, , 43F
他在意的球權 也許比較接近 他認為的合理打球方式
08/04 02:52, 43F

08/04 02:56, , 44F
RONDO是「覺得可以」 RAY往往是「為什麼不是」
08/04 02:56, 44F

08/04 02:57, , 45F
不是所有人都能像PIERCE那樣 被RONDO臭臉
08/04 02:57, 45F

08/04 02:58, , 46F
結果愣一下之後 還是跑到RONDO覺得可以的位子
08/04 02:58, 46F

08/04 03:01, , 47F
真的是個性想法上的差別就算了 除非RAY是覺得
08/04 03:01, 47F

08/04 03:02, , 48F
他去熱火可以更有機會或更輕鬆再拿到戒指......XD
08/04 03:02, 48F

08/04 03:23, , 49F
卡大說的還滿有道理的
08/04 03:23, 49F

08/04 03:24, , 50F
依稀記得當年RAY剛加入的時候
08/04 03:24, 50F

08/04 03:25, , 51F
RONDO有學習RAY賽前早點到球場的練習習慣
08/04 03:25, 51F

08/04 03:25, , 52F
不過近兩年好像已經沒有了 或許就是因為想法上的不同
08/04 03:25, 52F

08/04 03:26, , 53F
導致兩人漸行漸遠...
08/04 03:26, 53F

08/04 09:51, , 54F
嗯...也許Ray是想當指揮者勝過執行者
08/04 09:51, 54F

08/04 09:52, , 55F
Ray到熱火的話,以年紀上來說就是球隊的老大哥
08/04 09:52, 55F

08/04 09:53, , 56F
我想Riley應該是給抓住Ray想要的排場和地位
08/04 09:53, 56F
文章代碼(AID): #1G6ge6FC (Celtics)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 4 篇):
12
56
4
11
8
16
1
3
13年前, 08/02
文章代碼(AID): #1G6ge6FC (Celtics)