[情報] 大老闆們將推出英超的財政公平政策

看板Chelsea作者JamesCaesar (首席百人隊長)時間13年前 (2012/11/05 00:37)推噓1(1推 0噓 1→)

留言2則, 2人參與討論串1/1

http://sports.qq.com/a/20121105/000498.htm 騰訊體育 2012-11-05 12:20 英超無疑是全球影響力最大、財力最強的足球聯賽。一個佐證：目前英超電視轉播費是西甲意甲的3倍甚至5倍，而從下賽季開始，英超的全球電視轉播費將提升到三年50億英鎊。然而英超也不是沒有隱患，日益提升的薪資成本讓英超列強苦不堪言。好在《每日郵報》披露，英超20強的老闆正通過一系列的會談，準備出台“限制薪金增長公約”，從而捅破英超的薪金毒瘤。英超自1992年創建以來，取得了長足進步，全球影響力和財政收入水漲船高，近年來由於大批國際資本的注入，英超擁有任何其他聯賽所無法比擬的超強財力。但是近年來，英超列強卻陷入了“通貨膨脹”的經營難題，僅僅是2010-11賽季，英超20 強就合計赤字達到3.61億英鎊，其中曼城（1.97億英鎊）、切爾西（6800萬英鎊）、利物浦（4900萬英鎊）等豪門球會的赤字令人怵目驚心。英超的赤字根源在何處？除了日益提升的轉會費成本外，球員薪資的大幅提升，成為英超列強最頭疼的問題。2010-11賽季，英超20強的總計薪資達到了15億英鎊，計算稅收的話，各隊的薪資支出佔了他們69%的運營收入。而事實上，英超20強無力承擔如此巨大的人力成本，因為他們合計負債達到了24億英鎊。另一組數據更加令人怵目驚心：英超始建期的20年前，球員平均週薪為1755英鎊，而到了2010年，這一數字變為3.5萬英鎊，20倍！如今，魯尼、范佩西等眾多球員的週薪都超過20萬英鎊 — 年薪超過千萬英鎊，再不加以限制，英超只會陷入“收入越多、負債越多”的難題。《每日郵報》認為，鑑於英超新的3年50億英鎊的巨額轉播費協議將於下賽季執行，因此很多頂級球星 — 特別是他們的經紀人，已經準備叩響各大俱樂部老闆的大門，在現有薪資的基礎上再度索要加薪。因此，包括切爾西老闆阿布拉莫維奇、曼聯老闆格雷澤家族在內的英超20強的老闆們，最近不斷的舉行峰會，目標是希望在新的轉播協議出台之前，出台限制薪金增長的公約，確保增加的電視轉播收益不會全部落入日漸貪婪的球員和經紀人的口袋。值得一提的是，英國媒體指出，原本歐洲各大俱樂部對於歐足聯所謂的“財政公平法案”有所期待。但是歐足聯的這一法案目前很難落實：這一法案規定3年累計虧損超過4500萬歐元的球隊無法參加歐戰，但無數不符合這一條件的球隊並未真正被排除在外。有鑑於此，英超只能靠自己了。《每日郵報》披露，過去很長一段時間裡，英超的老闆們一直在就這些問題進行會談，而預計11月15日在倫敦，20強的巨頭將匯聚一堂爭取出台正式的框架式協議。據悉，英超各隊並不打算出台類似NBA的“工資帽”制度，而是計劃，每一年俱樂部的薪資總支出的增長，不能超過前一賽季的5%。目前，英超豪門的一些老闆，比如阿布拉莫維奇、曼城的酋長、曼聯的格雷澤家族、阿森納、利物浦的美國老闆，都原則上支持這一倡議，因為切爾西曼城的老闆認為此舉能讓他們減少虧損，而曼聯利物浦的老闆們認為此舉有助於他們還債。一位內部人士透露：“幾乎所有的俱樂部都贊同，認為需要在下賽季新轉播協議啟用前做點什麼。看起來很快就會達成正式的協議。” 不過根據英國媒體的說法，也有強烈反對這一倡議的球會，比如富勒姆老闆默罕默德˙法伊德。為此，西漢姆聯隊老闆甚至公開聲明：“我們必須控制支出、縮減負債、確保收益，而且必須盡快！” 有識之士指出，如果英超各巨頭能夠把這個驚人的計劃投入實施，那對於英超各隊開源節流、更好的整合資源而言自然是有利無害。不過，真做到這一點並不容易。足壇的勞資矛盾由來已久，很難徹底解決，此外，富勒姆老闆為何反對？因為他認為此舉會讓球隊難以轉賣出去。需知，一旦英超有富豪進入，欲炮製“新曼城”或“新切爾西”的神話，那麼每年5%的薪資增長公約，就很難真正落實施行 — 需知阿布投資切爾西、酋長投資曼城的第一年，兩隊的薪資增長速度是這個數字的數倍甚至數十倍。（冷雪） --------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2227488/ Roman-Abramovich-Glazers-aiming-stop-footballers-earning-mega-money.html By Joe Bernstein - PUBLISHED:22:30 GMT, 3 November 2012 Premier League owners, including Roman Abramovich and the Glazer family, are close to agreeing a crackdown on players' wages. Talks have already taken place between all 20 top-flight clubs about introducing their own version of financial fairplay and a formal outline could be agreed later this month when Premier League chairmen meet in London on November 15. There is a growing desire among the Premier League's international owners to keep a big slice of what could be ￡5billion from the new television deals that start next year, rather than see it all go to players and their agents. They are about to agree new rules on 'wage restraint', prohibiting clubs from increasing their wage bill by more than five per cent annually. Clubs spent ￡1.5bn on wages in 2010-11, 69 per cent of their income, and they had debts of ￡2.4bn, more than the amount they brought in. Among the more radical proposals is that member clubs should be made to break even, something that even UEFA's fairplay rules do not insist on. And West Ham chairman David Gold wants a points deduction for those whose debt exceeds a certain level of turnover. Significantly, there is a will among even the richest owners — Abramovich at Chelsea and Sheik Mansour at Manchester City — to stop making huge losses. And the new breed of American owners — John W Henry (Liverpool), Ellis Short (Sunderland), Stan Kroenke (Arsenal), the Glazers (Manchester United) and Randy Lerner (Aston Villa) — are desperate to see a return on their investment. Premier League clubs made cumulative losses of ￡361million, according to figures for 2010-11, with City (￡197m), Chelsea (￡68m), and Liverpool (￡49m), most in the red. An historic agreement by clubs would mark the end of escalating salaries enjoyed by elite players since the Premier League began in 1992. And that would be welcomed by ordinary fans who feel the gravy train has created a generation of stars who are out of touch. By using 'wage restraint' rather than 'wage cap', club bosses hope changes will be palatable to the Professional Footballers' Association. The average wage for a Premier League player was ￡1,755 a week 20 years ago but had risen to nearly ￡35,000 per week in 2010. Since then, it has gone up again, with United agreeing packages of more than ￡200,000 a week — more than ￡10m a year — for Wayne Rooney and Robin van Persie. And there are fears that players will want even more after the three-year deals secured by BT Vision and Sky. An insider said: 'There is a consensus from nearly every club that something needs to happen before the new TV deal takes effect next season. It doesn't make sense for clubs to carry on losing money when so much revenue is being generated. It's looking likely some form of agreement will be found.' Executives from all top-flight clubs met in September in three regional meetings. But the get-together in 11 days is the first real chance for formal progress. Fourteen of the 20 clubs have to agree to a new rule and it is believed only Fulham are explicitly against any form of financial fairplay, with chairman Mohamed Fayed worried the restrictions would deter a potential buyer in the future. UEFA FFP rules allow clubs to make losses of €45m over three years. Many would like it to be compulsory for clubs to break even but a compromise might have to be reached. Clubs like City, who have invested hugely since a takeover in 2008, would be given time to meet requirements and newly-promoted clubs would also be given dispensation on the five-per-cent wage rule. With negotiations at a delicate stage, most chairmen are reluctant to go into too much detail, but West Ham's Gold was candid for the website, Huffington Post. 'We need to regulate spending, reduce debt and ensure profit — and quickly,' he said. 'We have to stop clubs running up debt or we'll have an even more desperate situation. We can't have clubs running with large percentage of debt against their turnover. 'The lower leagues have implemented new regulation, and the Premier League must do the same. I would propose that there is a robust and clear debt cap — enforced by a transfer ban on incoming players or a points deduction. 'Of the bottom 12 clubs in the PL most will lose money and three will be relegated. But with proper governance, those 12 clubs, including the three to be relegated, could make ￡100m. It's infinitely more desirable to get relegated having made ￡10m than having lost ￡10m.' -- http://jamescaesar.pixnet.net/album/photo/110781933 永遠以摸過它為榮 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.248.157.170